Strengthening capacity for natural sciences research: A qualitative assessment to identify good practices, capacity gaps and investment priorities in African research institutions.

BACKGROUND:Strengthening research capacity in low-and-middle-income countries is essential to drive socioeconomic development and to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Understanding strengths and weaknesses in institutions' research capacity can guide effective targeting of investments...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taghreed El Hajj, Stefanie Gregorius, Justin Pulford, Imelda Bates
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228261
_version_ 1818833658584236032
author Taghreed El Hajj
Stefanie Gregorius
Justin Pulford
Imelda Bates
author_facet Taghreed El Hajj
Stefanie Gregorius
Justin Pulford
Imelda Bates
author_sort Taghreed El Hajj
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND:Strengthening research capacity in low-and-middle-income countries is essential to drive socioeconomic development and to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Understanding strengths and weaknesses in institutions' research capacity can guide effective targeting of investments and resources. This study assessed the capacity of institutions undertaking research in natural science topics in Africa to identify priority capacity gaps for future investment. METHODS:Assessments were conducted in eight African institutions that were partners in a UK-Africa programme to strengthen research capacity in renewable energy, soil-related science, and water and sanitation. Assessments involved eighty-six interviews and three focus group discussions to identify institutions' research capacity strengths and gaps against an evidence-informed benchmark. Use of the same interview guides and data collection processes across all institutions meant that findings could be compared. RESULTS:Common research capacity gaps were: lack of, or poorly maintained, equipment; unreliable, slow procurement systems; insufficient opportunities for developing the skills of research support staff such as administrators and technicians; dysfunctional institutional email communication systems; insufficient focus on the development of 'soft' researcher skills such as ethics, academic writing and, in non-Anglophone countries, English language. Programme strengths were the South-South and South-North partnerships for sharing and cascading expertise and resources, joint writing of proposals and publications, and improved individual and institutional visibility. CONCLUSION:There were many similarities in research capacity gaps irrespective of the institutions' natural sciences research focus, and these were similar to those reported in the health sector. Common capacity needs are improving the skills of technicians and administrators to support research activities, soft skills training for researchers, and more effective pan-institutional e-communication systems. These could be strategic investment targets for the joint efforts of national governments and international organisations that fund programmes for strengthening research capacity in low- and middle-income countries.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T02:22:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-74eac2f53b404d44b8041c04f1dead9a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T02:22:25Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-74eac2f53b404d44b8041c04f1dead9a2022-12-21T20:40:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01151e022826110.1371/journal.pone.0228261Strengthening capacity for natural sciences research: A qualitative assessment to identify good practices, capacity gaps and investment priorities in African research institutions.Taghreed El HajjStefanie GregoriusJustin PulfordImelda BatesBACKGROUND:Strengthening research capacity in low-and-middle-income countries is essential to drive socioeconomic development and to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Understanding strengths and weaknesses in institutions' research capacity can guide effective targeting of investments and resources. This study assessed the capacity of institutions undertaking research in natural science topics in Africa to identify priority capacity gaps for future investment. METHODS:Assessments were conducted in eight African institutions that were partners in a UK-Africa programme to strengthen research capacity in renewable energy, soil-related science, and water and sanitation. Assessments involved eighty-six interviews and three focus group discussions to identify institutions' research capacity strengths and gaps against an evidence-informed benchmark. Use of the same interview guides and data collection processes across all institutions meant that findings could be compared. RESULTS:Common research capacity gaps were: lack of, or poorly maintained, equipment; unreliable, slow procurement systems; insufficient opportunities for developing the skills of research support staff such as administrators and technicians; dysfunctional institutional email communication systems; insufficient focus on the development of 'soft' researcher skills such as ethics, academic writing and, in non-Anglophone countries, English language. Programme strengths were the South-South and South-North partnerships for sharing and cascading expertise and resources, joint writing of proposals and publications, and improved individual and institutional visibility. CONCLUSION:There were many similarities in research capacity gaps irrespective of the institutions' natural sciences research focus, and these were similar to those reported in the health sector. Common capacity needs are improving the skills of technicians and administrators to support research activities, soft skills training for researchers, and more effective pan-institutional e-communication systems. These could be strategic investment targets for the joint efforts of national governments and international organisations that fund programmes for strengthening research capacity in low- and middle-income countries.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228261
spellingShingle Taghreed El Hajj
Stefanie Gregorius
Justin Pulford
Imelda Bates
Strengthening capacity for natural sciences research: A qualitative assessment to identify good practices, capacity gaps and investment priorities in African research institutions.
PLoS ONE
title Strengthening capacity for natural sciences research: A qualitative assessment to identify good practices, capacity gaps and investment priorities in African research institutions.
title_full Strengthening capacity for natural sciences research: A qualitative assessment to identify good practices, capacity gaps and investment priorities in African research institutions.
title_fullStr Strengthening capacity for natural sciences research: A qualitative assessment to identify good practices, capacity gaps and investment priorities in African research institutions.
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening capacity for natural sciences research: A qualitative assessment to identify good practices, capacity gaps and investment priorities in African research institutions.
title_short Strengthening capacity for natural sciences research: A qualitative assessment to identify good practices, capacity gaps and investment priorities in African research institutions.
title_sort strengthening capacity for natural sciences research a qualitative assessment to identify good practices capacity gaps and investment priorities in african research institutions
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228261
work_keys_str_mv AT taghreedelhajj strengtheningcapacityfornaturalsciencesresearchaqualitativeassessmenttoidentifygoodpracticescapacitygapsandinvestmentprioritiesinafricanresearchinstitutions
AT stefaniegregorius strengtheningcapacityfornaturalsciencesresearchaqualitativeassessmenttoidentifygoodpracticescapacitygapsandinvestmentprioritiesinafricanresearchinstitutions
AT justinpulford strengtheningcapacityfornaturalsciencesresearchaqualitativeassessmenttoidentifygoodpracticescapacitygapsandinvestmentprioritiesinafricanresearchinstitutions
AT imeldabates strengtheningcapacityfornaturalsciencesresearchaqualitativeassessmenttoidentifygoodpracticescapacitygapsandinvestmentprioritiesinafricanresearchinstitutions