Effect of cover crops on greenhouse gas emissions in an irrigated field under integrated soil fertility management

Agronomical and environmental benefits are associated with replacing winter fallow by cover crops (CCs). Yet, the effect of this practice on nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions remains poorly understood. In this context, a field experiment was carried out under Mediterranean conditi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Guardia, D. Abalos, S. García-Marco, M. Quemada, M. Alonso-Ayuso, L. M. Cárdenas, E. R. Dixon, A. Vallejo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-09-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:http://www.biogeosciences.net/13/5245/2016/bg-13-5245-2016.pdf
_version_ 1811323873145126912
author G. Guardia
D. Abalos
S. García-Marco
M. Quemada
M. Alonso-Ayuso
L. M. Cárdenas
E. R. Dixon
A. Vallejo
author_facet G. Guardia
D. Abalos
S. García-Marco
M. Quemada
M. Alonso-Ayuso
L. M. Cárdenas
E. R. Dixon
A. Vallejo
author_sort G. Guardia
collection DOAJ
description Agronomical and environmental benefits are associated with replacing winter fallow by cover crops (CCs). Yet, the effect of this practice on nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions remains poorly understood. In this context, a field experiment was carried out under Mediterranean conditions to evaluate the effect of replacing the traditional winter fallow (F) by vetch (<i>Vicia sativa</i> L.; V) or barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.; B) on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during the intercrop and the maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) cropping period. The maize was fertilized following integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) criteria. Maize nitrogen (N) uptake, soil mineral N concentrations, soil temperature and moisture, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and GHG fluxes were measured during the experiment. Our management (adjusted N synthetic rates due to ISFM) and pedo-climatic conditions resulted in low cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (0.57 to 0.75 kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), yield-scaled N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (3–6 g N<sub>2</sub>O-N kg aboveground N uptake<sup>−1</sup>) and N surplus (31 to 56 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) for all treatments. Although CCs increased N<sub>2</sub>O emissions during the intercrop period compared to F (1.6 and 2.6 times in B and V, respectively), the ISFM resulted in similar cumulative emissions for the CCs and F at the end of the maize cropping period. The higher C : N ratio of the B residue led to a greater proportion of N<sub>2</sub>O losses from the synthetic fertilizer in these plots when compared to V. No significant differences were observed in CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes at the end of the experiment. This study shows that the use of both legume and nonlegume CCs combined with ISFM could provide, in addition to the advantages reported in previous studies, an opportunity to maximize agronomic efficiency (lowering synthetic N requirements for the subsequent cash crop) without increasing cumulative or yield-scaled N<sub>2</sub>O losses.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T14:03:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-74ee7e96a1574251bc0445f72adc61aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T14:03:53Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Biogeosciences
spelling doaj.art-74ee7e96a1574251bc0445f72adc61aa2022-12-22T02:43:58ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892016-09-0113185245525710.5194/bg-13-5245-2016Effect of cover crops on greenhouse gas emissions in an irrigated field under integrated soil fertility managementG. Guardia0D. Abalos1S. García-Marco2M. Quemada3M. Alonso-Ayuso4L. M. Cárdenas5E. R. Dixon6A. Vallejo7ETSI Agronomos, Technical University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, SpainSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, CanadaETSI Agronomos, Technical University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, SpainETSI Agronomos, Technical University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, SpainETSI Agronomos, Technical University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, SpainRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Devon, EX20 2SB, UKRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Devon, EX20 2SB, UKETSI Agronomos, Technical University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, SpainAgronomical and environmental benefits are associated with replacing winter fallow by cover crops (CCs). Yet, the effect of this practice on nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions remains poorly understood. In this context, a field experiment was carried out under Mediterranean conditions to evaluate the effect of replacing the traditional winter fallow (F) by vetch (<i>Vicia sativa</i> L.; V) or barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.; B) on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during the intercrop and the maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) cropping period. The maize was fertilized following integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) criteria. Maize nitrogen (N) uptake, soil mineral N concentrations, soil temperature and moisture, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and GHG fluxes were measured during the experiment. Our management (adjusted N synthetic rates due to ISFM) and pedo-climatic conditions resulted in low cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (0.57 to 0.75 kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), yield-scaled N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (3–6 g N<sub>2</sub>O-N kg aboveground N uptake<sup>−1</sup>) and N surplus (31 to 56 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) for all treatments. Although CCs increased N<sub>2</sub>O emissions during the intercrop period compared to F (1.6 and 2.6 times in B and V, respectively), the ISFM resulted in similar cumulative emissions for the CCs and F at the end of the maize cropping period. The higher C : N ratio of the B residue led to a greater proportion of N<sub>2</sub>O losses from the synthetic fertilizer in these plots when compared to V. No significant differences were observed in CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes at the end of the experiment. This study shows that the use of both legume and nonlegume CCs combined with ISFM could provide, in addition to the advantages reported in previous studies, an opportunity to maximize agronomic efficiency (lowering synthetic N requirements for the subsequent cash crop) without increasing cumulative or yield-scaled N<sub>2</sub>O losses.http://www.biogeosciences.net/13/5245/2016/bg-13-5245-2016.pdf
spellingShingle G. Guardia
D. Abalos
S. García-Marco
M. Quemada
M. Alonso-Ayuso
L. M. Cárdenas
E. R. Dixon
A. Vallejo
Effect of cover crops on greenhouse gas emissions in an irrigated field under integrated soil fertility management
Biogeosciences
title Effect of cover crops on greenhouse gas emissions in an irrigated field under integrated soil fertility management
title_full Effect of cover crops on greenhouse gas emissions in an irrigated field under integrated soil fertility management
title_fullStr Effect of cover crops on greenhouse gas emissions in an irrigated field under integrated soil fertility management
title_full_unstemmed Effect of cover crops on greenhouse gas emissions in an irrigated field under integrated soil fertility management
title_short Effect of cover crops on greenhouse gas emissions in an irrigated field under integrated soil fertility management
title_sort effect of cover crops on greenhouse gas emissions in an irrigated field under integrated soil fertility management
url http://www.biogeosciences.net/13/5245/2016/bg-13-5245-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gguardia effectofcovercropsongreenhousegasemissionsinanirrigatedfieldunderintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement
AT dabalos effectofcovercropsongreenhousegasemissionsinanirrigatedfieldunderintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement
AT sgarciamarco effectofcovercropsongreenhousegasemissionsinanirrigatedfieldunderintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement
AT mquemada effectofcovercropsongreenhousegasemissionsinanirrigatedfieldunderintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement
AT malonsoayuso effectofcovercropsongreenhousegasemissionsinanirrigatedfieldunderintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement
AT lmcardenas effectofcovercropsongreenhousegasemissionsinanirrigatedfieldunderintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement
AT erdixon effectofcovercropsongreenhousegasemissionsinanirrigatedfieldunderintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement
AT avallejo effectofcovercropsongreenhousegasemissionsinanirrigatedfieldunderintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement