Mobile Phone-Based Measures of Activity, Step Count, and Gait Speed: Results From a Study of Older Ambulatory Adults in a Naturalistic Setting
BackgroundCellular mobile telephone technology shows much promise for delivering and evaluating healthcare interventions in cost-effective manners with minimal barriers to access. There is little data demonstrating that these devices can accurately measure clinically important aspects of individual...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2017-10-01
|
| Series: | JMIR mHealth and uHealth |
| Online Access: | http://mhealth.jmir.org/2017/10/e104/ |
| _version_ | 1818382409259810816 |
|---|---|
| author | Rye Hanton, Cassia Kwon, Yong-Jun Aung, Thawda Whittington, Jackie High, Robin R Goulding, Evan H Schenk, A Katrin Bonasera, Stephen J |
| author_facet | Rye Hanton, Cassia Kwon, Yong-Jun Aung, Thawda Whittington, Jackie High, Robin R Goulding, Evan H Schenk, A Katrin Bonasera, Stephen J |
| author_sort | Rye Hanton, Cassia |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | BackgroundCellular mobile telephone technology shows much promise for delivering and evaluating healthcare interventions in cost-effective manners with minimal barriers to access. There is little data demonstrating that these devices can accurately measure clinically important aspects of individual functional status in naturalistic environments outside of the laboratory.
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to demonstrate that data derived from ubiquitous mobile phone technology, using algorithms developed and previously validated by our lab in a controlled setting, can be employed to continuously and noninvasively measure aspects of participant (subject) health status including step counts, gait speed, and activity level, in a naturalistic community setting. A second objective was to compare our mobile phone-based data against current standard survey-based gait instruments and clinical physical performance measures in order to determine whether they measured similar or independent constructs.
MethodsA total of 43 ambulatory, independently dwelling older adults were recruited from Nebraska Medicine, including 25 (58%, 25/43) healthy control individuals from our Engage Wellness Center and 18 (42%, 18/43) functionally impaired, cognitively intact individuals (who met at least 3 of 5 criteria for frailty) from our ambulatory Geriatrics Clinic. The following previously-validated surveys were obtained on study day 1: (1) Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI); (2) Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (SAFFE); (3) Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), short form version 1.0 Physical Function 10a (PROMIS-PF); and (4) PROMIS Global Health, short form version 1.1 (PROMIS-GH). In addition, clinical physical performance measurements of frailty (10 foot Get up and Go, 4 Meter walk, and Figure-of-8 Walk [F8W]) were also obtained. These metrics were compared to our mobile phone-based metrics collected from the participants in the community over a 24-hour period occurring within 1 week of the initial assessment.
ResultsWe identified statistically significant differences between functionally intact and frail participants in mobile phone-derived measures of percent activity (P=.002, t test), active versus inactive status (P=.02, t test), average step counts (P<.001, repeated measures analysis of variance [ANOVA]) and gait speed (P<.001, t test). In functionally intact individuals, the above mobile phone metrics assessed aspects of functional status independent (Bland-Altman and correlation analysis) of both survey- and/or performance battery-based functional measures. In contrast, in frail individuals, the above mobile phone metrics correlated with submeasures of both SAFFE and PROMIS-GH.
ConclusionsContinuous mobile phone-based measures of participant community activity and mobility strongly differentiate between persons with intact functional status and persons with a frailty phenotype. These measures assess dimensions of functional status independent of those measured using current validated questionnaires and physical performance assessments to identify functional compromise. Mobile phone-based gait measures may provide a more readily accessible and less-time consuming measure of gait, while further providing clinicians with longitudinal gait measures that are currently difficult to obtain. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T02:50:01Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-750626eb5c0740d9bad80a540c831b9a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2291-5222 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T02:50:01Z |
| publishDate | 2017-10-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR mHealth and uHealth |
| spelling | doaj.art-750626eb5c0740d9bad80a540c831b9a2022-12-21T23:19:48ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR mHealth and uHealth2291-52222017-10-01510e10410.2196/mhealth.5090Mobile Phone-Based Measures of Activity, Step Count, and Gait Speed: Results From a Study of Older Ambulatory Adults in a Naturalistic SettingRye Hanton, CassiaKwon, Yong-JunAung, ThawdaWhittington, JackieHigh, Robin RGoulding, Evan HSchenk, A KatrinBonasera, Stephen JBackgroundCellular mobile telephone technology shows much promise for delivering and evaluating healthcare interventions in cost-effective manners with minimal barriers to access. There is little data demonstrating that these devices can accurately measure clinically important aspects of individual functional status in naturalistic environments outside of the laboratory. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to demonstrate that data derived from ubiquitous mobile phone technology, using algorithms developed and previously validated by our lab in a controlled setting, can be employed to continuously and noninvasively measure aspects of participant (subject) health status including step counts, gait speed, and activity level, in a naturalistic community setting. A second objective was to compare our mobile phone-based data against current standard survey-based gait instruments and clinical physical performance measures in order to determine whether they measured similar or independent constructs. MethodsA total of 43 ambulatory, independently dwelling older adults were recruited from Nebraska Medicine, including 25 (58%, 25/43) healthy control individuals from our Engage Wellness Center and 18 (42%, 18/43) functionally impaired, cognitively intact individuals (who met at least 3 of 5 criteria for frailty) from our ambulatory Geriatrics Clinic. The following previously-validated surveys were obtained on study day 1: (1) Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI); (2) Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (SAFFE); (3) Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), short form version 1.0 Physical Function 10a (PROMIS-PF); and (4) PROMIS Global Health, short form version 1.1 (PROMIS-GH). In addition, clinical physical performance measurements of frailty (10 foot Get up and Go, 4 Meter walk, and Figure-of-8 Walk [F8W]) were also obtained. These metrics were compared to our mobile phone-based metrics collected from the participants in the community over a 24-hour period occurring within 1 week of the initial assessment. ResultsWe identified statistically significant differences between functionally intact and frail participants in mobile phone-derived measures of percent activity (P=.002, t test), active versus inactive status (P=.02, t test), average step counts (P<.001, repeated measures analysis of variance [ANOVA]) and gait speed (P<.001, t test). In functionally intact individuals, the above mobile phone metrics assessed aspects of functional status independent (Bland-Altman and correlation analysis) of both survey- and/or performance battery-based functional measures. In contrast, in frail individuals, the above mobile phone metrics correlated with submeasures of both SAFFE and PROMIS-GH. ConclusionsContinuous mobile phone-based measures of participant community activity and mobility strongly differentiate between persons with intact functional status and persons with a frailty phenotype. These measures assess dimensions of functional status independent of those measured using current validated questionnaires and physical performance assessments to identify functional compromise. Mobile phone-based gait measures may provide a more readily accessible and less-time consuming measure of gait, while further providing clinicians with longitudinal gait measures that are currently difficult to obtain.http://mhealth.jmir.org/2017/10/e104/ |
| spellingShingle | Rye Hanton, Cassia Kwon, Yong-Jun Aung, Thawda Whittington, Jackie High, Robin R Goulding, Evan H Schenk, A Katrin Bonasera, Stephen J Mobile Phone-Based Measures of Activity, Step Count, and Gait Speed: Results From a Study of Older Ambulatory Adults in a Naturalistic Setting JMIR mHealth and uHealth |
| title | Mobile Phone-Based Measures of Activity, Step Count, and Gait Speed: Results From a Study of Older Ambulatory Adults in a Naturalistic Setting |
| title_full | Mobile Phone-Based Measures of Activity, Step Count, and Gait Speed: Results From a Study of Older Ambulatory Adults in a Naturalistic Setting |
| title_fullStr | Mobile Phone-Based Measures of Activity, Step Count, and Gait Speed: Results From a Study of Older Ambulatory Adults in a Naturalistic Setting |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mobile Phone-Based Measures of Activity, Step Count, and Gait Speed: Results From a Study of Older Ambulatory Adults in a Naturalistic Setting |
| title_short | Mobile Phone-Based Measures of Activity, Step Count, and Gait Speed: Results From a Study of Older Ambulatory Adults in a Naturalistic Setting |
| title_sort | mobile phone based measures of activity step count and gait speed results from a study of older ambulatory adults in a naturalistic setting |
| url | http://mhealth.jmir.org/2017/10/e104/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ryehantoncassia mobilephonebasedmeasuresofactivitystepcountandgaitspeedresultsfromastudyofolderambulatoryadultsinanaturalisticsetting AT kwonyongjun mobilephonebasedmeasuresofactivitystepcountandgaitspeedresultsfromastudyofolderambulatoryadultsinanaturalisticsetting AT aungthawda mobilephonebasedmeasuresofactivitystepcountandgaitspeedresultsfromastudyofolderambulatoryadultsinanaturalisticsetting AT whittingtonjackie mobilephonebasedmeasuresofactivitystepcountandgaitspeedresultsfromastudyofolderambulatoryadultsinanaturalisticsetting AT highrobinr mobilephonebasedmeasuresofactivitystepcountandgaitspeedresultsfromastudyofolderambulatoryadultsinanaturalisticsetting AT gouldingevanh mobilephonebasedmeasuresofactivitystepcountandgaitspeedresultsfromastudyofolderambulatoryadultsinanaturalisticsetting AT schenkakatrin mobilephonebasedmeasuresofactivitystepcountandgaitspeedresultsfromastudyofolderambulatoryadultsinanaturalisticsetting AT bonaserastephenj mobilephonebasedmeasuresofactivitystepcountandgaitspeedresultsfromastudyofolderambulatoryadultsinanaturalisticsetting |