Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising therapy to promote recovery of the upper limb after stroke. According to the regulation of cortical excitability, rTMS can be divided into excitatory rTMS and inhibitory rTMS, and excitatory rTMS includes high-frequency rTM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhiqing Tang, Kaiyue Han, Rongrong Wang, Yue Zhang, Hao Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.918597/full
_version_ 1818204934396444672
author Zhiqing Tang
Zhiqing Tang
Kaiyue Han
Kaiyue Han
Rongrong Wang
Rongrong Wang
Yue Zhang
Yue Zhang
Hao Zhang
Hao Zhang
Hao Zhang
Hao Zhang
author_facet Zhiqing Tang
Zhiqing Tang
Kaiyue Han
Kaiyue Han
Rongrong Wang
Rongrong Wang
Yue Zhang
Yue Zhang
Hao Zhang
Hao Zhang
Hao Zhang
Hao Zhang
author_sort Zhiqing Tang
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising therapy to promote recovery of the upper limb after stroke. According to the regulation of cortical excitability, rTMS can be divided into excitatory rTMS and inhibitory rTMS, and excitatory rTMS includes high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) or intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS). We aimed to evaluate the effects of excitatory rTMS over the ipsilesional hemisphere on upper limb motor recovery after stroke.MethodsDatabases of PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials published before 31 December 2021. RCTs on the effects of HF-rTMS or iTBS on upper limb function in patients diagnosed with stroke were included. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and assessed quality. The meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager Version 5.4 software.ResultsFifteen studies with 449 participants were included in this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis found that excitatory rTMS had significant efficacy on upper limb motor function (MD = 5.88, 95% CI, 3.32–8.43, P < 0.001), hand strength (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.04–1.01, P = 0.03), and hand dexterity (SMD = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.39–1.14, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses based on different types of rTMS showed that both iTBS and HF-rTMS significantly promoted upper limb motor function (iTBS, P < 0.001; HF-rTMS, P < 0.001) and hand dexterity (iTBS, P = 0.01; HF-rTMS, P < 0.001) but not hand strength (iTBS, P = 0.07; HF-rTMS, P = 0.12). Further subgroup analysis based on the duration of illness demonstrated that applying excitatory rTMS during the first 3 months (<1 month, P = 0.01; 1–3 months, P = 0.001) after stroke brought significant improvement in upper limb motor function but not in the patients with a duration longer than 3 months (P = 0.06). We found that HF-rTMS significantly enhanced the motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude of affected hemisphere (SMD = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.32–1.33, P = 0.001).ConclusionOur study demonstrated that excitatory rTMS over the ipsilesional hemisphere could significantly improve upper limb motor function, hand strength, and hand dexterity in patients diagnosed with stroke. Both iTBS and HF-rTMS which could significantly promote upper limb motor function and hand dexterity, and excitatory rTMS were beneficial to upper limb motor function recovery only when applied in the first 3 months after stroke. HF-rTMS could significantly enhance the MEP amplitude of the affected hemisphere. High-quality and large-scale randomized controlled trials in the future are required to confirm our conclusions.Clinical Trial Registrationwww.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022312288.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T03:49:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-75082180eb224bcabe0f84c49dc79c9e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T03:49:07Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-75082180eb224bcabe0f84c49dc79c9e2022-12-22T00:39:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952022-06-011310.3389/fneur.2022.918597918597Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisZhiqing Tang0Zhiqing Tang1Kaiyue Han2Kaiyue Han3Rongrong Wang4Rongrong Wang5Yue Zhang6Yue Zhang7Hao Zhang8Hao Zhang9Hao Zhang10Hao Zhang11School of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, ChinaCheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, ChinaUniversity of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, ChinaBackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising therapy to promote recovery of the upper limb after stroke. According to the regulation of cortical excitability, rTMS can be divided into excitatory rTMS and inhibitory rTMS, and excitatory rTMS includes high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) or intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS). We aimed to evaluate the effects of excitatory rTMS over the ipsilesional hemisphere on upper limb motor recovery after stroke.MethodsDatabases of PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials published before 31 December 2021. RCTs on the effects of HF-rTMS or iTBS on upper limb function in patients diagnosed with stroke were included. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and assessed quality. The meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager Version 5.4 software.ResultsFifteen studies with 449 participants were included in this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis found that excitatory rTMS had significant efficacy on upper limb motor function (MD = 5.88, 95% CI, 3.32–8.43, P < 0.001), hand strength (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.04–1.01, P = 0.03), and hand dexterity (SMD = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.39–1.14, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses based on different types of rTMS showed that both iTBS and HF-rTMS significantly promoted upper limb motor function (iTBS, P < 0.001; HF-rTMS, P < 0.001) and hand dexterity (iTBS, P = 0.01; HF-rTMS, P < 0.001) but not hand strength (iTBS, P = 0.07; HF-rTMS, P = 0.12). Further subgroup analysis based on the duration of illness demonstrated that applying excitatory rTMS during the first 3 months (<1 month, P = 0.01; 1–3 months, P = 0.001) after stroke brought significant improvement in upper limb motor function but not in the patients with a duration longer than 3 months (P = 0.06). We found that HF-rTMS significantly enhanced the motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude of affected hemisphere (SMD = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.32–1.33, P = 0.001).ConclusionOur study demonstrated that excitatory rTMS over the ipsilesional hemisphere could significantly improve upper limb motor function, hand strength, and hand dexterity in patients diagnosed with stroke. Both iTBS and HF-rTMS which could significantly promote upper limb motor function and hand dexterity, and excitatory rTMS were beneficial to upper limb motor function recovery only when applied in the first 3 months after stroke. HF-rTMS could significantly enhance the MEP amplitude of the affected hemisphere. High-quality and large-scale randomized controlled trials in the future are required to confirm our conclusions.Clinical Trial Registrationwww.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022312288.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.918597/fullstrokerepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationupper limbmotor functionmeta-analysis
spellingShingle Zhiqing Tang
Zhiqing Tang
Kaiyue Han
Kaiyue Han
Rongrong Wang
Rongrong Wang
Yue Zhang
Yue Zhang
Hao Zhang
Hao Zhang
Hao Zhang
Hao Zhang
Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Frontiers in Neurology
stroke
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
upper limb
motor function
meta-analysis
title Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the ipsilesional hemisphere for upper limb motor function after stroke a systematic review and meta analysis
topic stroke
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
upper limb
motor function
meta-analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.918597/full
work_keys_str_mv AT zhiqingtang excitatoryrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationovertheipsilesionalhemisphereforupperlimbmotorfunctionafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhiqingtang excitatoryrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationovertheipsilesionalhemisphereforupperlimbmotorfunctionafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kaiyuehan excitatoryrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationovertheipsilesionalhemisphereforupperlimbmotorfunctionafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kaiyuehan excitatoryrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationovertheipsilesionalhemisphereforupperlimbmotorfunctionafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rongrongwang excitatoryrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationovertheipsilesionalhemisphereforupperlimbmotorfunctionafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rongrongwang excitatoryrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationovertheipsilesionalhemisphereforupperlimbmotorfunctionafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuezhang excitatoryrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationovertheipsilesionalhemisphereforupperlimbmotorfunctionafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuezhang excitatoryrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationovertheipsilesionalhemisphereforupperlimbmotorfunctionafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haozhang excitatoryrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationovertheipsilesionalhemisphereforupperlimbmotorfunctionafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haozhang excitatoryrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationovertheipsilesionalhemisphereforupperlimbmotorfunctionafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haozhang excitatoryrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationovertheipsilesionalhemisphereforupperlimbmotorfunctionafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haozhang excitatoryrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationovertheipsilesionalhemisphereforupperlimbmotorfunctionafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis