Comparison of the patient’s satisfaction underwent penile prosthesis; Malleable versus Ambicor: Single center experience
Objective: To compare the surgical results, complications, and satisfaction levels of patients who underwent malleable penile prosthesis implantation (M-PPI) and Ambicor penile prosthesis implantation (A-PPI). Material and methods: One hundred forty two patients who underwent penile prosthesis impl...
Main Authors: | Omer Bayrak, Sakip Erturhan, Ilker Seckiner, Mehmet Ozturk, Haluk Sen, Ahmet Erbagci |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PAGEPress Publications
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/aiua/article/view/8623 |
Similar Items
-
Can Ambicor® Penile Prosthesis be Used in One Piece in Patients with Inadequate Cavernous Structure? Our Experience of Two Cases
by: Fatih Akdemir, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Infrapubic approach for malleable penile implant
by: Oswaldo L. D. Berg
Published: (2011-02-01) -
Malleable Penile Implant Is an Effective Therapeutic Option in Men With Peyronie’s Disease and Erectile Dysfunction
by: Mohamad Habous, MD, FEBU, FECSM, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Patient satisfaction and penile morphology changes with postoperative penile rehabilitation 2 years after Coloplast Titan prosthesis
by: Michael B Pryor, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Electrophysiological evaluation of alterations in penile sensation due to penile prosthesis implantation in patients with erectile dysfunction
by: İbrahim Erol, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)