Factors predictive of an academic otolaryngologist’s scholarly impact
Objectives: Describe the h index as a bibliometric that can be utilized to objectively evaluate scholarly impact. Identify which otolaryngology subspecialties are the most scholarly. Describe if NIH funding to one’s choice of medical school, residency, or fellowship has any impact on one’s scholarly...
Main Authors: | Courtney B. Shires, Theodore D. Klug, Ryan K. Meacham, Merry E. Sebelik |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-10-01
|
Series: | World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095881120301700 |
Similar Items
-
Scholarly productivity and citation impact of academic psychologists in Group of Eight universities
by: Nick Haslam, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Scholarly productivity and citation impact of Australian academic psychologists
by: Trevor G. Mazzucchelli, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Book Review: Scholarly Metrics Under the Microscope: From Citation Analysis to Academic Auditing
by: Marinus Swanepoel
Published: (2015-06-01) -
Bibliometric indicators: spread reflections for a focusing and conscious use
by: Tessa Piazzini
Published: (2010-04-01) -
Bibliometric indicators: spread reflections for a focusing and conscious use
by: Tessa Piazzini
Published: (2010-04-01)