DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): The role of imaging in uterus transplantation
Objective: Uterus transplantation is rapidly becoming a viable clinical option for women with uterine-factor infertility and a desire for parenthood. Radiological imaging plays a central role in selecting the optimal living donors for uterus transplantation and serves to exclude any pathology and ev...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-09-01
|
| Series: | SAGE Open Medicine |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119875607 |
| _version_ | 1818239715644538880 |
|---|---|
| author | Soran Mahmood Liza Johannesson Giuliano Testa Gregory de Prisco |
| author_facet | Soran Mahmood Liza Johannesson Giuliano Testa Gregory de Prisco |
| author_sort | Soran Mahmood |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective: Uterus transplantation is rapidly becoming a viable clinical option for women with uterine-factor infertility and a desire for parenthood. Radiological imaging plays a central role in selecting the optimal living donors for uterus transplantation and serves to exclude any pathology and evaluate the uterine vasculature. The latter is the most important variable in the ultimate technical success of the uterus transplant. In this first report of imaging in the setting of uterus transplantation, we report our experience with living-donor selection, and the evolution of the imaging techniques that ultimately allowed a significant improvement in donor selection and transplant outcome. We also suggest a framework for preoperative imaging in uterus transplantation. Methods: Between 2016 and 2018, 27 potential living donors were evaluated by imaging prior to uterine donation for uterus transplantation. Predonation imaging included a screening chest radiograph, dual-phase computed tomography (CT) angiograms of the abdomen and pelvis in the arterial and venous phases and pelvic sonography with Doppler. Seventeen potential donors additionally underwent multiphasic pelvic MR angiograms. The imaging performed was meant to display features of the vascular anatomy relevant for uterus transplantation. Results: Out of the 27 potential live donors who were evaluated by imaging, 9 eventually donated their uterus for transplantation. The most frequent reason for exclusion was suboptimal quality of the vessels (33%), including small uterine arteries, the presence of atherosclerosis or small size/poor quality of the uterine or utero-ovarian veins, or both. The next most common reason was voluntary patient withdrawal or failure to complete the evaluation process (28%). Three potential donors (16.6%) were rejected for uterine factors, fibroids, and/or adenomyosis. Other reasons for donor rejection included ABO incompatibility and unfavorable psychological evaluation. Conclusion: Diagnostic imaging plays a crucial role in selecting appropriate potential donors, screening prospective recipients, planning the graft procedure, and following up on any graft or nongraft-related complications in both the donor and recipient after the transplantation procedure is performed. Contrast-enhanced CT and MR angiographies have complementary roles, especially when evaluating the donor for adequacy of the arterial and venous supply to the uterine graft and the experience gained from our series indicates that the inclusion of both modalities contributed directly to successful uterus transplant graft survival by selecting patients with favorable arterial and venous vasculature. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T13:01:57Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-75169bc3aacd4eb49f597cc68a6220ef |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2050-3121 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T13:01:57Z |
| publishDate | 2019-09-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | SAGE Open Medicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-75169bc3aacd4eb49f597cc68a6220ef2022-12-22T00:23:46ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medicine2050-31212019-09-01710.1177/2050312119875607DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): The role of imaging in uterus transplantationSoran Mahmood0Liza Johannesson1Giuliano Testa2Gregory de Prisco3Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USAAnnette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USAAnnette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USADepartment of Radiology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USAObjective: Uterus transplantation is rapidly becoming a viable clinical option for women with uterine-factor infertility and a desire for parenthood. Radiological imaging plays a central role in selecting the optimal living donors for uterus transplantation and serves to exclude any pathology and evaluate the uterine vasculature. The latter is the most important variable in the ultimate technical success of the uterus transplant. In this first report of imaging in the setting of uterus transplantation, we report our experience with living-donor selection, and the evolution of the imaging techniques that ultimately allowed a significant improvement in donor selection and transplant outcome. We also suggest a framework for preoperative imaging in uterus transplantation. Methods: Between 2016 and 2018, 27 potential living donors were evaluated by imaging prior to uterine donation for uterus transplantation. Predonation imaging included a screening chest radiograph, dual-phase computed tomography (CT) angiograms of the abdomen and pelvis in the arterial and venous phases and pelvic sonography with Doppler. Seventeen potential donors additionally underwent multiphasic pelvic MR angiograms. The imaging performed was meant to display features of the vascular anatomy relevant for uterus transplantation. Results: Out of the 27 potential live donors who were evaluated by imaging, 9 eventually donated their uterus for transplantation. The most frequent reason for exclusion was suboptimal quality of the vessels (33%), including small uterine arteries, the presence of atherosclerosis or small size/poor quality of the uterine or utero-ovarian veins, or both. The next most common reason was voluntary patient withdrawal or failure to complete the evaluation process (28%). Three potential donors (16.6%) were rejected for uterine factors, fibroids, and/or adenomyosis. Other reasons for donor rejection included ABO incompatibility and unfavorable psychological evaluation. Conclusion: Diagnostic imaging plays a crucial role in selecting appropriate potential donors, screening prospective recipients, planning the graft procedure, and following up on any graft or nongraft-related complications in both the donor and recipient after the transplantation procedure is performed. Contrast-enhanced CT and MR angiographies have complementary roles, especially when evaluating the donor for adequacy of the arterial and venous supply to the uterine graft and the experience gained from our series indicates that the inclusion of both modalities contributed directly to successful uterus transplant graft survival by selecting patients with favorable arterial and venous vasculature.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119875607 |
| spellingShingle | Soran Mahmood Liza Johannesson Giuliano Testa Gregory de Prisco DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): The role of imaging in uterus transplantation SAGE Open Medicine |
| title | DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): The role of imaging in uterus transplantation |
| title_full | DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): The role of imaging in uterus transplantation |
| title_fullStr | DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): The role of imaging in uterus transplantation |
| title_full_unstemmed | DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): The role of imaging in uterus transplantation |
| title_short | DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): The role of imaging in uterus transplantation |
| title_sort | duets dallas uterus transplant study the role of imaging in uterus transplantation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119875607 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT soranmahmood duetsdallasuterustransplantstudytheroleofimaginginuterustransplantation AT lizajohannesson duetsdallasuterustransplantstudytheroleofimaginginuterustransplantation AT giulianotesta duetsdallasuterustransplantstudytheroleofimaginginuterustransplantation AT gregorydeprisco duetsdallasuterustransplantstudytheroleofimaginginuterustransplantation |