Mitigation of agricultural emissions in the tropics: comparing forest land-sparing options at the national level

Emissions from agriculture-driven deforestation are of global concern, but forest land-sparing interventions such as agricultural intensification and utilization of available non-forest land offer opportunities for mitigation. In many tropical countries, where agriculture is the major driver of defo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Carter, M. Herold, M. C. Rufino, K. Neumann, L. Kooistra, L. Verchot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-08-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:http://www.biogeosciences.net/12/4809/2015/bg-12-4809-2015.pdf
_version_ 1818930266220003328
author S. Carter
M. Herold
M. C. Rufino
K. Neumann
L. Kooistra
L. Verchot
author_facet S. Carter
M. Herold
M. C. Rufino
K. Neumann
L. Kooistra
L. Verchot
author_sort S. Carter
collection DOAJ
description Emissions from agriculture-driven deforestation are of global concern, but forest land-sparing interventions such as agricultural intensification and utilization of available non-forest land offer opportunities for mitigation. In many tropical countries, where agriculture is the major driver of deforestation, interventions in the agriculture sector could reduce deforestation emissions as well as reduce emissions in the agriculture sector. Our study uses a novel approach to quantify agriculture-driven deforestation and associated emissions in the tropics between 2000 and 2010. Emissions from agriculture-driven deforestation in the tropics (97 countries) are 4.3 GtCO<sub>2</sub>e yr<sup>−1</sup>. We investigate the national potential to mitigate these emissions through forest land-sparing interventions, which can potentially be implemented under REDD+. We consider intensification and utilization of available non-forested land as forest land-sparing opportunities since they avoid the expansion of agriculture into forested land. In addition, we assess the potential to reduce agricultural emissions on existing agriculture land. The use of a systematic framework demonstrates the selection of mitigation interventions by considering sequentially the level of emissions, mitigation potential of various interventions, enabling environment and associated risks to livelihoods at the national level. Our results show that considering only countries with high emissions from agriculture-driven deforestation, with potential for forest-sparing interventions and a good enabling environment (e.g. effective governance or engagement in REDD+), there is a potential to mitigate 1.3 GtCO<sub>2</sub>e yr<sup>−1</sup> (20 countries of 78 with sufficient data). For countries where we identify agricultural emissions as a priority for mitigation, up to 1 GtCO<sub>2</sub>e yr<sup>−1</sup> could be reduced from the agriculture sector including livestock. Risks to livelihoods from implementing interventions based on national level data call for detailed investigation at the local level to inform decisions on mitigation interventions. Three case studies demonstrate the use of the analytical framework. The inherent link between the agriculture and forestry sectors due to competition for land suggests that these sectors cannot be considered independently. Our findings highlight the need to include the forest and the agricultural sectors in the decision-making process to mitigate deforestation.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T03:57:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-751e9742a9fe4574b431d3f0afb756a1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T03:57:58Z
publishDate 2015-08-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Biogeosciences
spelling doaj.art-751e9742a9fe4574b431d3f0afb756a12022-12-21T19:54:16ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892015-08-0112154809482510.5194/bg-12-4809-2015Mitigation of agricultural emissions in the tropics: comparing forest land-sparing options at the national levelS. Carter0M. Herold1M. C. Rufino2K. Neumann3L. Kooistra4L. Verchot5Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, the NetherlandsLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, the NetherlandsCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), P.O. Box 30677, 00100 Nairobi, KenyaLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, the NetherlandsLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, the NetherlandsCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Jl CIFOR, Bogor 16115, IndonesiaEmissions from agriculture-driven deforestation are of global concern, but forest land-sparing interventions such as agricultural intensification and utilization of available non-forest land offer opportunities for mitigation. In many tropical countries, where agriculture is the major driver of deforestation, interventions in the agriculture sector could reduce deforestation emissions as well as reduce emissions in the agriculture sector. Our study uses a novel approach to quantify agriculture-driven deforestation and associated emissions in the tropics between 2000 and 2010. Emissions from agriculture-driven deforestation in the tropics (97 countries) are 4.3 GtCO<sub>2</sub>e yr<sup>−1</sup>. We investigate the national potential to mitigate these emissions through forest land-sparing interventions, which can potentially be implemented under REDD+. We consider intensification and utilization of available non-forested land as forest land-sparing opportunities since they avoid the expansion of agriculture into forested land. In addition, we assess the potential to reduce agricultural emissions on existing agriculture land. The use of a systematic framework demonstrates the selection of mitigation interventions by considering sequentially the level of emissions, mitigation potential of various interventions, enabling environment and associated risks to livelihoods at the national level. Our results show that considering only countries with high emissions from agriculture-driven deforestation, with potential for forest-sparing interventions and a good enabling environment (e.g. effective governance or engagement in REDD+), there is a potential to mitigate 1.3 GtCO<sub>2</sub>e yr<sup>−1</sup> (20 countries of 78 with sufficient data). For countries where we identify agricultural emissions as a priority for mitigation, up to 1 GtCO<sub>2</sub>e yr<sup>−1</sup> could be reduced from the agriculture sector including livestock. Risks to livelihoods from implementing interventions based on national level data call for detailed investigation at the local level to inform decisions on mitigation interventions. Three case studies demonstrate the use of the analytical framework. The inherent link between the agriculture and forestry sectors due to competition for land suggests that these sectors cannot be considered independently. Our findings highlight the need to include the forest and the agricultural sectors in the decision-making process to mitigate deforestation.http://www.biogeosciences.net/12/4809/2015/bg-12-4809-2015.pdf
spellingShingle S. Carter
M. Herold
M. C. Rufino
K. Neumann
L. Kooistra
L. Verchot
Mitigation of agricultural emissions in the tropics: comparing forest land-sparing options at the national level
Biogeosciences
title Mitigation of agricultural emissions in the tropics: comparing forest land-sparing options at the national level
title_full Mitigation of agricultural emissions in the tropics: comparing forest land-sparing options at the national level
title_fullStr Mitigation of agricultural emissions in the tropics: comparing forest land-sparing options at the national level
title_full_unstemmed Mitigation of agricultural emissions in the tropics: comparing forest land-sparing options at the national level
title_short Mitigation of agricultural emissions in the tropics: comparing forest land-sparing options at the national level
title_sort mitigation of agricultural emissions in the tropics comparing forest land sparing options at the national level
url http://www.biogeosciences.net/12/4809/2015/bg-12-4809-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT scarter mitigationofagriculturalemissionsinthetropicscomparingforestlandsparingoptionsatthenationallevel
AT mherold mitigationofagriculturalemissionsinthetropicscomparingforestlandsparingoptionsatthenationallevel
AT mcrufino mitigationofagriculturalemissionsinthetropicscomparingforestlandsparingoptionsatthenationallevel
AT kneumann mitigationofagriculturalemissionsinthetropicscomparingforestlandsparingoptionsatthenationallevel
AT lkooistra mitigationofagriculturalemissionsinthetropicscomparingforestlandsparingoptionsatthenationallevel
AT lverchot mitigationofagriculturalemissionsinthetropicscomparingforestlandsparingoptionsatthenationallevel