Three-Dimensional Heads-Up vs. Standard Operating Microscope for Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The surgical time duration, the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the incidence rate of intraoperative complications, alongside the vision and posturing parameters, were estimated by systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the three-dimensional (3D) heads-up v...
Main Authors: | Matteo Ripa, Nikolaos Kopsacheilis, Kanellina Kanellopoulou, Mikes Nomikarios, Lorenzo Motta |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-08-01
|
Series: | Diagnostics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/9/2100 |
Similar Items
-
The Scope Of Three-Dimensional Digital Visualization Systems In Vitreoretinal Surgery
by: Agranat JS, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
3D Heads-Up Display vs. Standard Operating Microscope Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
by: Ben Asani, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Cataract surgery training: Report of a trainee's experience
by: Matteo Ripa, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
A Comparative Study of Traditional Scleral Buckling to a New Technique: Guarded Light Pipe with Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Visualization
by: Baldwin G, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
The Impact of Steep Trendelenburg Position on Intraocular Pressure
by: Matteo Ripa, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01)