LesionQuant for Assessment of MRI in Multiple Sclerosis—A Promising Supplement to the Visual Scan Inspection

Background and Goals: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a central nervous system inflammatory disease where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important tool for diagnosis and disease monitoring. Quantitative measurements of lesion volume, lesion count, distribution of lesions, and brain atrophy have a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Synne Brune, Einar A. Høgestøl, Vanja Cengija, Pål Berg-Hansen, Piotr Sowa, Gro O. Nygaard, Hanne F. Harbo, Mona K. Beyer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.546744/full
_version_ 1818857597870014464
author Synne Brune
Synne Brune
Einar A. Høgestøl
Einar A. Høgestøl
Vanja Cengija
Pål Berg-Hansen
Pål Berg-Hansen
Piotr Sowa
Gro O. Nygaard
Hanne F. Harbo
Hanne F. Harbo
Mona K. Beyer
Mona K. Beyer
author_facet Synne Brune
Synne Brune
Einar A. Høgestøl
Einar A. Høgestøl
Vanja Cengija
Pål Berg-Hansen
Pål Berg-Hansen
Piotr Sowa
Gro O. Nygaard
Hanne F. Harbo
Hanne F. Harbo
Mona K. Beyer
Mona K. Beyer
author_sort Synne Brune
collection DOAJ
description Background and Goals: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a central nervous system inflammatory disease where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important tool for diagnosis and disease monitoring. Quantitative measurements of lesion volume, lesion count, distribution of lesions, and brain atrophy have a potentially significant value for evaluating disease progression. We hypothesize that utilizing software designed for evaluating MRI data in MS will provide more accurate and detailed analyses compared to the visual neuro-radiological evaluation.Methods: A group of 56 MS patients (mean age 35 years, 70% females and 96% relapsing-remitting MS) was examined with brain MRI one and 5 years after diagnosis. The T1 and FLAIR brain MRI sequences for all patients were analyzed using the LesionQuant (LQ) software. These data were compared with data from structured visual evaluations of the MRI scans performed by neuro-radiologists, including assessments of atrophy, and lesion count. The data from LQ were also compared with data from other validated research methods for brain segmentation, including assessments of whole brain volume and lesion volume. Correlations with clinical tests like the timed 25-foot walk test (T25FT) were performed to explore additional value of LQ analyses.Results: Lesion count assessments by LQ and by the neuro-radiologist were significantly correlated one year (cor = 0.92, p = 2.2 × 10−16) and 5 years (cor = 0.84, p = 2.7 × 10−16) after diagnosis. Analyzes of the intra- and interrater variability also correlated significantly (cor = 0.96, p < 0.001, cor = 0.97, p < 0.001). Significant positive correlation was found between lesion volume measured by LQ and by the software Cascade (cor = 0.7, p < 0.001. LQ detected a reduction in whole brain percentile >10 in 10 patients across the time-points, whereas the neuro-radiologist assessment identified six of these. The neuro-radiologist additionally identified five patients with increased atrophy in the follow-up period, all of them displayed decreasing low whole brain percentiles (median 11, range 8–28) in the LQ analysis. Significant positive correlation was identified between lesion volume measured by LQ and test performance on the T25FT both at 1 and 5 years after diagnosis.Conclusion: For the number of MS lesions at both time-points, we demonstrated strong correlations between the assessments done by LQ and the neuro-radiologist. Lesion volume evaluated with LQ correlated with T25FT performance. LQ-analyses classified more patients to have brain atrophy than the visual neuro-radiological evaluation. In conclusion, LQ seems like a promising supplement to the evaluation performed by neuro-radiologists, providing an automated tool for evaluating lesions in MS patients and also detecting early signs of atrophy in both a longitudinal and cross-sectional setting.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T08:42:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-752fc697d451445981cf73311bc30b7e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T08:42:56Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-752fc697d451445981cf73311bc30b7e2022-12-21T20:28:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952020-12-011110.3389/fneur.2020.546744546744LesionQuant for Assessment of MRI in Multiple Sclerosis—A Promising Supplement to the Visual Scan InspectionSynne Brune0Synne Brune1Einar A. Høgestøl2Einar A. Høgestøl3Vanja Cengija4Pål Berg-Hansen5Pål Berg-Hansen6Piotr Sowa7Gro O. Nygaard8Hanne F. Harbo9Hanne F. Harbo10Mona K. Beyer11Mona K. Beyer12Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayBackground and Goals: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a central nervous system inflammatory disease where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important tool for diagnosis and disease monitoring. Quantitative measurements of lesion volume, lesion count, distribution of lesions, and brain atrophy have a potentially significant value for evaluating disease progression. We hypothesize that utilizing software designed for evaluating MRI data in MS will provide more accurate and detailed analyses compared to the visual neuro-radiological evaluation.Methods: A group of 56 MS patients (mean age 35 years, 70% females and 96% relapsing-remitting MS) was examined with brain MRI one and 5 years after diagnosis. The T1 and FLAIR brain MRI sequences for all patients were analyzed using the LesionQuant (LQ) software. These data were compared with data from structured visual evaluations of the MRI scans performed by neuro-radiologists, including assessments of atrophy, and lesion count. The data from LQ were also compared with data from other validated research methods for brain segmentation, including assessments of whole brain volume and lesion volume. Correlations with clinical tests like the timed 25-foot walk test (T25FT) were performed to explore additional value of LQ analyses.Results: Lesion count assessments by LQ and by the neuro-radiologist were significantly correlated one year (cor = 0.92, p = 2.2 × 10−16) and 5 years (cor = 0.84, p = 2.7 × 10−16) after diagnosis. Analyzes of the intra- and interrater variability also correlated significantly (cor = 0.96, p < 0.001, cor = 0.97, p < 0.001). Significant positive correlation was found between lesion volume measured by LQ and by the software Cascade (cor = 0.7, p < 0.001. LQ detected a reduction in whole brain percentile >10 in 10 patients across the time-points, whereas the neuro-radiologist assessment identified six of these. The neuro-radiologist additionally identified five patients with increased atrophy in the follow-up period, all of them displayed decreasing low whole brain percentiles (median 11, range 8–28) in the LQ analysis. Significant positive correlation was identified between lesion volume measured by LQ and test performance on the T25FT both at 1 and 5 years after diagnosis.Conclusion: For the number of MS lesions at both time-points, we demonstrated strong correlations between the assessments done by LQ and the neuro-radiologist. Lesion volume evaluated with LQ correlated with T25FT performance. LQ-analyses classified more patients to have brain atrophy than the visual neuro-radiological evaluation. In conclusion, LQ seems like a promising supplement to the evaluation performed by neuro-radiologists, providing an automated tool for evaluating lesions in MS patients and also detecting early signs of atrophy in both a longitudinal and cross-sectional setting.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.546744/fullMRIlongitudinal lesionsbrain atrophyautomatic lesion detectionmultiple sclerosis
spellingShingle Synne Brune
Synne Brune
Einar A. Høgestøl
Einar A. Høgestøl
Vanja Cengija
Pål Berg-Hansen
Pål Berg-Hansen
Piotr Sowa
Gro O. Nygaard
Hanne F. Harbo
Hanne F. Harbo
Mona K. Beyer
Mona K. Beyer
LesionQuant for Assessment of MRI in Multiple Sclerosis—A Promising Supplement to the Visual Scan Inspection
Frontiers in Neurology
MRI
longitudinal lesions
brain atrophy
automatic lesion detection
multiple sclerosis
title LesionQuant for Assessment of MRI in Multiple Sclerosis—A Promising Supplement to the Visual Scan Inspection
title_full LesionQuant for Assessment of MRI in Multiple Sclerosis—A Promising Supplement to the Visual Scan Inspection
title_fullStr LesionQuant for Assessment of MRI in Multiple Sclerosis—A Promising Supplement to the Visual Scan Inspection
title_full_unstemmed LesionQuant for Assessment of MRI in Multiple Sclerosis—A Promising Supplement to the Visual Scan Inspection
title_short LesionQuant for Assessment of MRI in Multiple Sclerosis—A Promising Supplement to the Visual Scan Inspection
title_sort lesionquant for assessment of mri in multiple sclerosis a promising supplement to the visual scan inspection
topic MRI
longitudinal lesions
brain atrophy
automatic lesion detection
multiple sclerosis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.546744/full
work_keys_str_mv AT synnebrune lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection
AT synnebrune lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection
AT einarahøgestøl lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection
AT einarahøgestøl lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection
AT vanjacengija lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection
AT palberghansen lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection
AT palberghansen lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection
AT piotrsowa lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection
AT groonygaard lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection
AT hannefharbo lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection
AT hannefharbo lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection
AT monakbeyer lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection
AT monakbeyer lesionquantforassessmentofmriinmultiplesclerosisapromisingsupplementtothevisualscaninspection