Caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective study

Abstract Background Caesarean section rates are rising worldwide. One adverse effect of caesarean section reported in some studies is an increased risk of subfertility. Only a few studies have assessed the relationship between the previous mode of delivery and in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junrong Diao, Ge Gao, Yunshan Zhang, Xinyan Wang, Yinfeng Zhang, Ying Han, Aijun Du, Haining Luo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-07-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03955-7
_version_ 1818577429055143936
author Junrong Diao
Ge Gao
Yunshan Zhang
Xinyan Wang
Yinfeng Zhang
Ying Han
Aijun Du
Haining Luo
author_facet Junrong Diao
Ge Gao
Yunshan Zhang
Xinyan Wang
Yinfeng Zhang
Ying Han
Aijun Du
Haining Luo
author_sort Junrong Diao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Caesarean section rates are rising worldwide. One adverse effect of caesarean section reported in some studies is an increased risk of subfertility. Only a few studies have assessed the relationship between the previous mode of delivery and in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) reproductive outcomes. In this study, we primarily investigated the impact of a history of caesarean section with or without defects on IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes compared to a vaginal delivery history. Methods This retrospective study included 834 women who had a IVF or ICSI treatment at our centre between 2015 and 2019 with a delivery history. In total, 401 women with a previous vaginal delivery (VD) were assigned to the VD group, and 433 women with a history of delivery by caesarean section were included, among whom 359 had a caesarean scar (CS) without a defect and were assigned to the CS group and 74 had a caesarean section defect (CSD) and were assigned to the CSD group. Baseline characteristics of the three groups were compared and analysed. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between clinical outcomes and different delivery modes. Results There were no significant differences in the live birth rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, mean implantation rate or abnormal pregnancy rate between the CS and VD groups However, the live birth rate and mean implantation rate in the CSD group were significantly lower than those in the VD group (21.6 vs 36.4%, adjusted OR 0.50 [0.27–0.9]; 0.25 ± 0.39 vs 0.35 ± 0.41, adjusted OR 0.90 [0.81–0.99]). Among women aged ≤ 35 years, the subgroup analyses showed that the live birth rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and mean implantation rate in the CSD group were all significantly lower than those in the VD group (21.4 vs 45.8%, adjusted OR 0.35[0.15 ~ 0.85]; 38.1 vs 59.8%, adjusted OR 0.52[0.24–0.82]; 31.0 vs 55.6%, adjusted OR 0.43[0.19–0.92]; 0.27 ± 0.43 vs 0.43 ± 0.43, adjusted OR 0.85[0.43 ± 0.43]). For women older than 35 years, there was no statistically significant difference in any pregnancy outcome among the three groups. Conclusions This study suggested that the existence of a CS without a defect does not decrease the live birth rate after IVF or ICSI compared with a previous VD. However, the presence of a CSD in women, especially young women (age ≤ 35 years), significantly impaired the chances of subsequent pregnancy.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T06:29:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7530fdb5b8e941a2926ec1fd53143541
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T06:29:46Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-7530fdb5b8e941a2926ec1fd531435412022-12-21T22:40:55ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932021-07-0121111110.1186/s12884-021-03955-7Caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective studyJunrong Diao0Ge Gao1Yunshan Zhang2Xinyan Wang3Yinfeng Zhang4Ying Han5Aijun Du6Haining Luo7Center for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and GynecologyCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and GynecologyCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and GynecologyCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and GynecologyCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and GynecologyCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and GynecologyCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and GynecologyCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and GynecologyAbstract Background Caesarean section rates are rising worldwide. One adverse effect of caesarean section reported in some studies is an increased risk of subfertility. Only a few studies have assessed the relationship between the previous mode of delivery and in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) reproductive outcomes. In this study, we primarily investigated the impact of a history of caesarean section with or without defects on IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes compared to a vaginal delivery history. Methods This retrospective study included 834 women who had a IVF or ICSI treatment at our centre between 2015 and 2019 with a delivery history. In total, 401 women with a previous vaginal delivery (VD) were assigned to the VD group, and 433 women with a history of delivery by caesarean section were included, among whom 359 had a caesarean scar (CS) without a defect and were assigned to the CS group and 74 had a caesarean section defect (CSD) and were assigned to the CSD group. Baseline characteristics of the three groups were compared and analysed. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between clinical outcomes and different delivery modes. Results There were no significant differences in the live birth rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, mean implantation rate or abnormal pregnancy rate between the CS and VD groups However, the live birth rate and mean implantation rate in the CSD group were significantly lower than those in the VD group (21.6 vs 36.4%, adjusted OR 0.50 [0.27–0.9]; 0.25 ± 0.39 vs 0.35 ± 0.41, adjusted OR 0.90 [0.81–0.99]). Among women aged ≤ 35 years, the subgroup analyses showed that the live birth rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and mean implantation rate in the CSD group were all significantly lower than those in the VD group (21.4 vs 45.8%, adjusted OR 0.35[0.15 ~ 0.85]; 38.1 vs 59.8%, adjusted OR 0.52[0.24–0.82]; 31.0 vs 55.6%, adjusted OR 0.43[0.19–0.92]; 0.27 ± 0.43 vs 0.43 ± 0.43, adjusted OR 0.85[0.43 ± 0.43]). For women older than 35 years, there was no statistically significant difference in any pregnancy outcome among the three groups. Conclusions This study suggested that the existence of a CS without a defect does not decrease the live birth rate after IVF or ICSI compared with a previous VD. However, the presence of a CSD in women, especially young women (age ≤ 35 years), significantly impaired the chances of subsequent pregnancy.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03955-7Caesarean section defectIn vitro fertilization-embryo transferPregnancy
spellingShingle Junrong Diao
Ge Gao
Yunshan Zhang
Xinyan Wang
Yinfeng Zhang
Ying Han
Aijun Du
Haining Luo
Caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective study
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Caesarean section defect
In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
Pregnancy
title Caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective study
title_full Caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective study
title_short Caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective study
title_sort caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization embryo transfer a retrospective study
topic Caesarean section defect
In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
Pregnancy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03955-7
work_keys_str_mv AT junrongdiao caesareansectiondefectsmayaffectpregnancyoutcomesafterinvitrofertilizationembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT gegao caesareansectiondefectsmayaffectpregnancyoutcomesafterinvitrofertilizationembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT yunshanzhang caesareansectiondefectsmayaffectpregnancyoutcomesafterinvitrofertilizationembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT xinyanwang caesareansectiondefectsmayaffectpregnancyoutcomesafterinvitrofertilizationembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT yinfengzhang caesareansectiondefectsmayaffectpregnancyoutcomesafterinvitrofertilizationembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT yinghan caesareansectiondefectsmayaffectpregnancyoutcomesafterinvitrofertilizationembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT aijundu caesareansectiondefectsmayaffectpregnancyoutcomesafterinvitrofertilizationembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT hainingluo caesareansectiondefectsmayaffectpregnancyoutcomesafterinvitrofertilizationembryotransferaretrospectivestudy