Zur regionalen Differenzierung von Wassernutzungsabgaben

Regulatory water use charges aim at restructuring water uses according to scarcity of regional water services. Hence, a spatial differentiation of the charge design appears to be an appropriate means of water pricing policy. Similarly, the European Water Framework Directive with its requirement of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erik Gawel, Stefan Möckel
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: oekom verlag GmbH 2011-10-01
Series:Raumforschung und Raumordnung
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/808
_version_ 1818025819889467392
author Erik Gawel
Stefan Möckel
author_facet Erik Gawel
Stefan Möckel
author_sort Erik Gawel
collection DOAJ
description Regulatory water use charges aim at restructuring water uses according to scarcity of regional water services. Hence, a spatial differentiation of the charge design appears to be an appropriate means of water pricing policy. Similarly, the European Water Framework Directive with its requirement of regional water resources management and its focus on river basins and water bodies could demand or indicate regional differentiations. However, in Germany two water use charges exist mainly unrelated to regional scarcity patterns: a nationwide effluent charge and different water extraction charges in 11 German States. Moreover, in 2006 the federal government has obtained the competence to implement a nationwide charge on water withdrawal without any regional differentiations. Against this background, the paper analyses the scope and limitations of regionally differentiated water use charges in Germany. First, the Water Framework Directive is examined as to whether the so-called combined approach of both emissions and immissions requirements makes a regional approach for charges mandatory. Second, the paper investigates the main conceptual elements and options of a regionalisation and their ecological, economic, legal and political aspects. The authors conclude that regionally differentiated water use charges are feasible as well as justifiable. However, with particular respect to the environmental objectives of protection of coastal water and marine ecosystems an effluent charge should still provide nationwide incentives according to the emissions principle. For water extraction charges the authors recommend a nationwide regulation framework yet completed by legal options for regional differentiations on e.g. water body level.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T04:22:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7540ef64120847929d211ab6746e2b78
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0034-0111
1869-4179
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-10T04:22:10Z
publishDate 2011-10-01
publisher oekom verlag GmbH
record_format Article
series Raumforschung und Raumordnung
spelling doaj.art-7540ef64120847929d211ab6746e2b782022-12-22T02:02:23Zdeuoekom verlag GmbHRaumforschung und Raumordnung0034-01111869-41792011-10-0169510.1007/s13147-011-0115-1Zur regionalen Differenzierung von WassernutzungsabgabenErik Gawel0Stefan Möckel1Department Ökonomie, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, DeutschlandDepartment Umwelt- und Planungsrecht, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Deutschland Regulatory water use charges aim at restructuring water uses according to scarcity of regional water services. Hence, a spatial differentiation of the charge design appears to be an appropriate means of water pricing policy. Similarly, the European Water Framework Directive with its requirement of regional water resources management and its focus on river basins and water bodies could demand or indicate regional differentiations. However, in Germany two water use charges exist mainly unrelated to regional scarcity patterns: a nationwide effluent charge and different water extraction charges in 11 German States. Moreover, in 2006 the federal government has obtained the competence to implement a nationwide charge on water withdrawal without any regional differentiations. Against this background, the paper analyses the scope and limitations of regionally differentiated water use charges in Germany. First, the Water Framework Directive is examined as to whether the so-called combined approach of both emissions and immissions requirements makes a regional approach for charges mandatory. Second, the paper investigates the main conceptual elements and options of a regionalisation and their ecological, economic, legal and political aspects. The authors conclude that regionally differentiated water use charges are feasible as well as justifiable. However, with particular respect to the environmental objectives of protection of coastal water and marine ecosystems an effluent charge should still provide nationwide incentives according to the emissions principle. For water extraction charges the authors recommend a nationwide regulation framework yet completed by legal options for regional differentiations on e.g. water body level. https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/808Effluent chargeWater extraction chargeWater Framework DirectiveRegional differentiationCombined approachWater body
spellingShingle Erik Gawel
Stefan Möckel
Zur regionalen Differenzierung von Wassernutzungsabgaben
Raumforschung und Raumordnung
Effluent charge
Water extraction charge
Water Framework Directive
Regional differentiation
Combined approach
Water body
title Zur regionalen Differenzierung von Wassernutzungsabgaben
title_full Zur regionalen Differenzierung von Wassernutzungsabgaben
title_fullStr Zur regionalen Differenzierung von Wassernutzungsabgaben
title_full_unstemmed Zur regionalen Differenzierung von Wassernutzungsabgaben
title_short Zur regionalen Differenzierung von Wassernutzungsabgaben
title_sort zur regionalen differenzierung von wassernutzungsabgaben
topic Effluent charge
Water extraction charge
Water Framework Directive
Regional differentiation
Combined approach
Water body
url https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/808
work_keys_str_mv AT erikgawel zurregionalendifferenzierungvonwassernutzungsabgaben
AT stefanmockel zurregionalendifferenzierungvonwassernutzungsabgaben