One-Year Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Natural and Drinking Water

Although the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been detected in wastewater from several countries, monitoring its presence in other water matrices is still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of this virus in natural and drinking water over one year of monitoring (2021). A survey of viral RNA was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Salvador, Maria Filomena Caeiro, Célia Neto, Rui Neves Carneiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Pathogens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/11/10/1133
_version_ 1827648389948375040
author Daniel Salvador
Maria Filomena Caeiro
Célia Neto
Rui Neves Carneiro
author_facet Daniel Salvador
Maria Filomena Caeiro
Célia Neto
Rui Neves Carneiro
author_sort Daniel Salvador
collection DOAJ
description Although the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been detected in wastewater from several countries, monitoring its presence in other water matrices is still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of this virus in natural and drinking water over one year of monitoring (2021). A survey of viral RNA was carried out by RT-qPCR in concentrated samples of surface water, groundwater, and drinking water from different regions of Portugal. SARS-CoV-2 RNA—quantified in genomic copies per liter (gc/L) of sampled water—was not detected in groundwater, but was detected and quantified in samples of surface water (two out of 43; 8035 and 23,757 gc/L) and in drinking water (one out of 43 samples; 7463 gc/L). The study also detected and quantified <i>Norovirus</i> RNA, intending to confirm the use of this enteric virus to assess variations in fecal matter throughout the sampling campaign. The samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA also had the highest concentrations of <i>Norovirus</i> RNA—including the drinking water sample, which proved negative for fecal enteric bacteria (FIB). These results indicate that, to protect human health, it is advisable to continue monitoring these viruses, and noroviruses as fecal indicators (FI) as well—especially in low-flow water bodies that receive wastewater.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:37:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7545829f7b8a46719570ef596f042b47
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0817
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:37:36Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pathogens
spelling doaj.art-7545829f7b8a46719570ef596f042b472023-11-24T01:48:24ZengMDPI AGPathogens2076-08172022-09-011110113310.3390/pathogens11101133One-Year Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Natural and Drinking WaterDaniel Salvador0Maria Filomena Caeiro1Célia Neto2Rui Neves Carneiro3Direção de Laboratórios (LAB) da Empresa Portuguesa das Águas Livres (EPAL), Avenida de Berlim, 15, 1800-031 Lisboa, PortugalCentro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (CESAM), Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Edifício C2-Piso 4, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, PortugalDireção de Laboratórios (LAB) da Empresa Portuguesa das Águas Livres (EPAL), Avenida de Berlim, 15, 1800-031 Lisboa, PortugalDireção de Laboratórios (LAB) da Empresa Portuguesa das Águas Livres (EPAL), Avenida de Berlim, 15, 1800-031 Lisboa, PortugalAlthough the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been detected in wastewater from several countries, monitoring its presence in other water matrices is still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of this virus in natural and drinking water over one year of monitoring (2021). A survey of viral RNA was carried out by RT-qPCR in concentrated samples of surface water, groundwater, and drinking water from different regions of Portugal. SARS-CoV-2 RNA—quantified in genomic copies per liter (gc/L) of sampled water—was not detected in groundwater, but was detected and quantified in samples of surface water (two out of 43; 8035 and 23,757 gc/L) and in drinking water (one out of 43 samples; 7463 gc/L). The study also detected and quantified <i>Norovirus</i> RNA, intending to confirm the use of this enteric virus to assess variations in fecal matter throughout the sampling campaign. The samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA also had the highest concentrations of <i>Norovirus</i> RNA—including the drinking water sample, which proved negative for fecal enteric bacteria (FIB). These results indicate that, to protect human health, it is advisable to continue monitoring these viruses, and noroviruses as fecal indicators (FI) as well—especially in low-flow water bodies that receive wastewater.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/11/10/1133human health<i>Norovirus</i>risk assessmentRT-qPCRwater monitoringwater safety
spellingShingle Daniel Salvador
Maria Filomena Caeiro
Célia Neto
Rui Neves Carneiro
One-Year Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Natural and Drinking Water
Pathogens
human health
<i>Norovirus</i>
risk assessment
RT-qPCR
water monitoring
water safety
title One-Year Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Natural and Drinking Water
title_full One-Year Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Natural and Drinking Water
title_fullStr One-Year Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Natural and Drinking Water
title_full_unstemmed One-Year Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Natural and Drinking Water
title_short One-Year Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Natural and Drinking Water
title_sort one year surveillance of sars cov 2 virus in natural and drinking water
topic human health
<i>Norovirus</i>
risk assessment
RT-qPCR
water monitoring
water safety
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/11/10/1133
work_keys_str_mv AT danielsalvador oneyearsurveillanceofsarscov2virusinnaturalanddrinkingwater
AT mariafilomenacaeiro oneyearsurveillanceofsarscov2virusinnaturalanddrinkingwater
AT celianeto oneyearsurveillanceofsarscov2virusinnaturalanddrinkingwater
AT ruinevescarneiro oneyearsurveillanceofsarscov2virusinnaturalanddrinkingwater