Personal rights over public Health: Anti-vaccine rhetoric in the Texas Legislature

During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an observed increase in anti-vaccine sentiment linked with requirements for the vaccines. But how did these ideas impact the politics of vaccines? In this paper, the authors analyze witness statements from the 2021 Texas Legislative Session during vaccine-rela...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Rekha Lakshmanan, Neha Kalakuntla, Neha Tallapragada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-06-01
Series:Vaccine: X
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259013622400041X
_version_ 1797277289210183680
author Kirstin R.W. Matthews
Rekha Lakshmanan
Neha Kalakuntla
Neha Tallapragada
author_facet Kirstin R.W. Matthews
Rekha Lakshmanan
Neha Kalakuntla
Neha Tallapragada
author_sort Kirstin R.W. Matthews
collection DOAJ
description During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an observed increase in anti-vaccine sentiment linked with requirements for the vaccines. But how did these ideas impact the politics of vaccines? In this paper, the authors analyze witness statements from the 2021 Texas Legislative Session during vaccine-related hearings. Specifically, the research focused on five hearings for bills that related to vaccine requirements or vaccine transparency laws filed during the 2021Texas Legislative Session and witnesses who opposed these measures. From the 128 witnesses cataloged and analyzed, we found 84 witnesses opposed to vaccines. Medical freedom and the right to opt-out of a medical procedure as well as concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness were most frequently used by witnesses to justify their stance against vaccine requirements or vaccines. While some witnesses were opposed to all vaccines, most focused their objections on the COVID-19 vaccine specifically.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:46:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-754df639ff07450aa5321037bb43de2f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2590-1362
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:46:31Z
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Vaccine: X
spelling doaj.art-754df639ff07450aa5321037bb43de2f2024-03-05T04:30:47ZengElsevierVaccine: X2590-13622024-06-0118100468Personal rights over public Health: Anti-vaccine rhetoric in the Texas LegislatureKirstin R.W. Matthews0Rekha Lakshmanan1Neha Kalakuntla2Neha Tallapragada3Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, MS-40, Houston, TX 77478, USA; Corresponding author at: 6100 Main Street, MS-40, Houston, TX 77005, USABaker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, MS-40, Houston, TX 77478, USA; The Immunization Partnership, PO Box 346, Houston, TX 77001, USABaker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, MS-40, Houston, TX 77478, USABaker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, MS-40, Houston, TX 77478, USADuring the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an observed increase in anti-vaccine sentiment linked with requirements for the vaccines. But how did these ideas impact the politics of vaccines? In this paper, the authors analyze witness statements from the 2021 Texas Legislative Session during vaccine-related hearings. Specifically, the research focused on five hearings for bills that related to vaccine requirements or vaccine transparency laws filed during the 2021Texas Legislative Session and witnesses who opposed these measures. From the 128 witnesses cataloged and analyzed, we found 84 witnesses opposed to vaccines. Medical freedom and the right to opt-out of a medical procedure as well as concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness were most frequently used by witnesses to justify their stance against vaccine requirements or vaccines. While some witnesses were opposed to all vaccines, most focused their objections on the COVID-19 vaccine specifically.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259013622400041XVaccine policyAnti-vaccineVaccine hesitantTexasMedical freedom
spellingShingle Kirstin R.W. Matthews
Rekha Lakshmanan
Neha Kalakuntla
Neha Tallapragada
Personal rights over public Health: Anti-vaccine rhetoric in the Texas Legislature
Vaccine: X
Vaccine policy
Anti-vaccine
Vaccine hesitant
Texas
Medical freedom
title Personal rights over public Health: Anti-vaccine rhetoric in the Texas Legislature
title_full Personal rights over public Health: Anti-vaccine rhetoric in the Texas Legislature
title_fullStr Personal rights over public Health: Anti-vaccine rhetoric in the Texas Legislature
title_full_unstemmed Personal rights over public Health: Anti-vaccine rhetoric in the Texas Legislature
title_short Personal rights over public Health: Anti-vaccine rhetoric in the Texas Legislature
title_sort personal rights over public health anti vaccine rhetoric in the texas legislature
topic Vaccine policy
Anti-vaccine
Vaccine hesitant
Texas
Medical freedom
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259013622400041X
work_keys_str_mv AT kirstinrwmatthews personalrightsoverpublichealthantivaccinerhetoricinthetexaslegislature
AT rekhalakshmanan personalrightsoverpublichealthantivaccinerhetoricinthetexaslegislature
AT nehakalakuntla personalrightsoverpublichealthantivaccinerhetoricinthetexaslegislature
AT nehatallapragada personalrightsoverpublichealthantivaccinerhetoricinthetexaslegislature