An Electronic Health Record–Based Automated Self-Rescheduling Tool to Improve Patient Access: Retrospective Cohort Study
BackgroundIn many large health centers, patients face long appointment wait times and difficulties accessing care. Last-minute cancellations and patient no-shows leave unfilled slots in a clinician’s schedule, exacerbating delays in care from poor access. The mismatch between...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e52071 |
| _version_ | 1797257129562734592 |
|---|---|
| author | Smitha Ganeshan Andrew W Liu Anne Kroeger Prerna Anand Richard Seefeldt Alexis Regner Diana Vaughn Anobel Y Odisho Michelle Mourad |
| author_facet | Smitha Ganeshan Andrew W Liu Anne Kroeger Prerna Anand Richard Seefeldt Alexis Regner Diana Vaughn Anobel Y Odisho Michelle Mourad |
| author_sort | Smitha Ganeshan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundIn many large health centers, patients face long appointment wait times and difficulties accessing care. Last-minute cancellations and patient no-shows leave unfilled slots in a clinician’s schedule, exacerbating delays in care from poor access. The mismatch between the supply of outpatient appointments and patient demand has led health systems to adopt many tools and strategies to minimize appointment no-show rates and fill open slots left by patient cancellations.
ObjectiveWe evaluated an electronic health record (EHR)–based self-scheduling tool, Fast Pass, at a large academic medical center to understand the impacts of the tool on the ability to fill cancelled appointment slots, patient access to earlier appointments, and clinical revenue from visits that may otherwise have gone unscheduled.
MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we extracted Fast Pass appointment offers and scheduling data, including patient demographics, from the EHR between June 18, 2022, and March 9, 2023. We analyzed the outcomes of Fast Pass offers (accepted, declined, expired, and unavailable) and the outcomes of scheduled appointments resulting from accepted Fast Pass offers (completed, canceled, and no-show). We stratified outcomes based on appointment specialty. For each specialty, the patient service revenue from appointments filled by Fast Pass was calculated using the visit slots filled, the payer mix of the appointments, and the contribution margin by payer.
ResultsFrom June 18 to March 9, 2023, there were a total of 60,660 Fast Pass offers sent to patients for 21,978 available appointments. Of these offers, 6603 (11%) were accepted across all departments, and 5399 (8.9%) visits were completed. Patients were seen a median (IQR) of 14 (4-33) days sooner for their appointments. In a multivariate logistic regression model with primary outcome Fast Pass offer acceptance, patients who were aged 65 years or older (vs 20-40 years; P=.005 odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.96), other ethnicity (vs White; P<.001, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91), primarily Chinese speakers (P<.001; OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.79), and other language speakers (vs English speakers; P=.001; OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.87) were less likely to accept an offer. Fast Pass added 2576 patient service hours to the clinical schedule, with a median (IQR) of 251 (216-322) hours per month. The estimated value of physician fees from these visits scheduled through 9 months of Fast Pass scheduling in professional fees at our institution was US $3 million.
ConclusionsSelf-scheduling tools that provide patients with an opportunity to schedule into cancelled or unfilled appointment slots have the potential to improve patient access and efficiently capture additional revenue from filling unfilled slots. The demographics of the patients accepting these offers suggest that such digital tools may exacerbate inequities in access. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T22:32:44Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-75542d4a5c0a4c53abcf78369dda9064 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1438-8871 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T22:32:44Z |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-75542d4a5c0a4c53abcf78369dda90642024-03-19T14:45:32ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712024-03-0126e5207110.2196/52071An Electronic Health Record–Based Automated Self-Rescheduling Tool to Improve Patient Access: Retrospective Cohort StudySmitha Ganeshanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3868-6813Andrew W Liuhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8033-2598Anne Kroegerhttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-2695-2285Prerna Anandhttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-3919-5785Richard Seefeldthttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-9570-5404Alexis Regnerhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-1541-1425Diana Vaughnhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-6490-5792Anobel Y Odishohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0975-0812Michelle Mouradhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4299-0802 BackgroundIn many large health centers, patients face long appointment wait times and difficulties accessing care. Last-minute cancellations and patient no-shows leave unfilled slots in a clinician’s schedule, exacerbating delays in care from poor access. The mismatch between the supply of outpatient appointments and patient demand has led health systems to adopt many tools and strategies to minimize appointment no-show rates and fill open slots left by patient cancellations. ObjectiveWe evaluated an electronic health record (EHR)–based self-scheduling tool, Fast Pass, at a large academic medical center to understand the impacts of the tool on the ability to fill cancelled appointment slots, patient access to earlier appointments, and clinical revenue from visits that may otherwise have gone unscheduled. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we extracted Fast Pass appointment offers and scheduling data, including patient demographics, from the EHR between June 18, 2022, and March 9, 2023. We analyzed the outcomes of Fast Pass offers (accepted, declined, expired, and unavailable) and the outcomes of scheduled appointments resulting from accepted Fast Pass offers (completed, canceled, and no-show). We stratified outcomes based on appointment specialty. For each specialty, the patient service revenue from appointments filled by Fast Pass was calculated using the visit slots filled, the payer mix of the appointments, and the contribution margin by payer. ResultsFrom June 18 to March 9, 2023, there were a total of 60,660 Fast Pass offers sent to patients for 21,978 available appointments. Of these offers, 6603 (11%) were accepted across all departments, and 5399 (8.9%) visits were completed. Patients were seen a median (IQR) of 14 (4-33) days sooner for their appointments. In a multivariate logistic regression model with primary outcome Fast Pass offer acceptance, patients who were aged 65 years or older (vs 20-40 years; P=.005 odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.96), other ethnicity (vs White; P<.001, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91), primarily Chinese speakers (P<.001; OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.79), and other language speakers (vs English speakers; P=.001; OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.87) were less likely to accept an offer. Fast Pass added 2576 patient service hours to the clinical schedule, with a median (IQR) of 251 (216-322) hours per month. The estimated value of physician fees from these visits scheduled through 9 months of Fast Pass scheduling in professional fees at our institution was US $3 million. ConclusionsSelf-scheduling tools that provide patients with an opportunity to schedule into cancelled or unfilled appointment slots have the potential to improve patient access and efficiently capture additional revenue from filling unfilled slots. The demographics of the patients accepting these offers suggest that such digital tools may exacerbate inequities in access.https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e52071 |
| spellingShingle | Smitha Ganeshan Andrew W Liu Anne Kroeger Prerna Anand Richard Seefeldt Alexis Regner Diana Vaughn Anobel Y Odisho Michelle Mourad An Electronic Health Record–Based Automated Self-Rescheduling Tool to Improve Patient Access: Retrospective Cohort Study Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| title | An Electronic Health Record–Based Automated Self-Rescheduling Tool to Improve Patient Access: Retrospective Cohort Study |
| title_full | An Electronic Health Record–Based Automated Self-Rescheduling Tool to Improve Patient Access: Retrospective Cohort Study |
| title_fullStr | An Electronic Health Record–Based Automated Self-Rescheduling Tool to Improve Patient Access: Retrospective Cohort Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | An Electronic Health Record–Based Automated Self-Rescheduling Tool to Improve Patient Access: Retrospective Cohort Study |
| title_short | An Electronic Health Record–Based Automated Self-Rescheduling Tool to Improve Patient Access: Retrospective Cohort Study |
| title_sort | electronic health record based automated self rescheduling tool to improve patient access retrospective cohort study |
| url | https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e52071 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT smithaganeshan anelectronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT andrewwliu anelectronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT annekroeger anelectronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT prernaanand anelectronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT richardseefeldt anelectronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT alexisregner anelectronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT dianavaughn anelectronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT anobelyodisho anelectronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT michellemourad anelectronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT smithaganeshan electronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT andrewwliu electronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT annekroeger electronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT prernaanand electronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT richardseefeldt electronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT alexisregner electronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT dianavaughn electronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT anobelyodisho electronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy AT michellemourad electronichealthrecordbasedautomatedselfreschedulingtooltoimprovepatientaccessretrospectivecohortstudy |