After-Death Communications (ADCs) from Non-Human Animals: Parallels with Human ADCs

In an earlier study, Rupert Sheldrake, Pam Smart, and Michael Nahm reviewed accounts of end-of-life experiences (ELEs) involving non-human animals. They showed animal ELEs to be similar to human ELEs, suggesting common underlying processes. Here, we consider apparent after-death communications (ADC...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James G. Matlock, Beth Hilton, Rupert Sheldrake, Pam Smart, Michael Nahm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SSE 2024-04-01
Series:Journal of Scientific Exploration
Online Access:https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/3087
_version_ 1797215162366689280
author James G. Matlock
Beth Hilton
Rupert Sheldrake
Pam Smart
Michael Nahm
author_facet James G. Matlock
Beth Hilton
Rupert Sheldrake
Pam Smart
Michael Nahm
author_sort James G. Matlock
collection DOAJ
description In an earlier study, Rupert Sheldrake, Pam Smart, and Michael Nahm reviewed accounts of end-of-life experiences (ELEs) involving non-human animals. They showed animal ELEs to be similar to human ELEs, suggesting common underlying processes. Here, we consider apparent after-death communications (ADCs) from non-human animals and compare them to accounts of ADCs from humans. We collected 442 accounts of animal ADCs from our own appeals and from reports in the literature. We found a close resemblance between ADCs from animals and from humans in the types of experience—dream visitations, a sense of presence, visual, auditory, tactile, and olfactory apparitions, and psychokinetic effects. As with human ADCs, the great majority of animal ADCs were reported to have occurred in the first hours or days after death, with a dramatic falling off over time. Moreover, our data show that people grieve their pets in much the same fashion as they grieve their human loved ones, suggesting that human bereavement studies would do well to take into account the animal data to which we draw attention. Doing so may help clarify issues regarding the fundamental nature of the experiences—determining whether they are best regarded as internal hallucinations, as living-agent-psi-mediated subjective or objective phenomena, or as actual contacts with the deceased—which in turn carries implications not only for academic studies of bereavement but for clinical practice with the bereaved.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T11:25:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-755806eba85c402e965178446fb05fc6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0892-3310
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T11:25:41Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher SSE
record_format Article
series Journal of Scientific Exploration
spelling doaj.art-755806eba85c402e965178446fb05fc62024-04-10T17:33:47ZengSSEJournal of Scientific Exploration0892-33102024-04-0138110.31275/20243087After-Death Communications (ADCs) from Non-Human Animals: Parallels with Human ADCsJames G. Matlock0Beth HiltonRupert SheldrakePam SmartMichael Nahm1Parapsychology FoundationInstitute for Frontier Areas of Psychology and Mental Health In an earlier study, Rupert Sheldrake, Pam Smart, and Michael Nahm reviewed accounts of end-of-life experiences (ELEs) involving non-human animals. They showed animal ELEs to be similar to human ELEs, suggesting common underlying processes. Here, we consider apparent after-death communications (ADCs) from non-human animals and compare them to accounts of ADCs from humans. We collected 442 accounts of animal ADCs from our own appeals and from reports in the literature. We found a close resemblance between ADCs from animals and from humans in the types of experience—dream visitations, a sense of presence, visual, auditory, tactile, and olfactory apparitions, and psychokinetic effects. As with human ADCs, the great majority of animal ADCs were reported to have occurred in the first hours or days after death, with a dramatic falling off over time. Moreover, our data show that people grieve their pets in much the same fashion as they grieve their human loved ones, suggesting that human bereavement studies would do well to take into account the animal data to which we draw attention. Doing so may help clarify issues regarding the fundamental nature of the experiences—determining whether they are best regarded as internal hallucinations, as living-agent-psi-mediated subjective or objective phenomena, or as actual contacts with the deceased—which in turn carries implications not only for academic studies of bereavement but for clinical practice with the bereaved. https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/3087
spellingShingle James G. Matlock
Beth Hilton
Rupert Sheldrake
Pam Smart
Michael Nahm
After-Death Communications (ADCs) from Non-Human Animals: Parallels with Human ADCs
Journal of Scientific Exploration
title After-Death Communications (ADCs) from Non-Human Animals: Parallels with Human ADCs
title_full After-Death Communications (ADCs) from Non-Human Animals: Parallels with Human ADCs
title_fullStr After-Death Communications (ADCs) from Non-Human Animals: Parallels with Human ADCs
title_full_unstemmed After-Death Communications (ADCs) from Non-Human Animals: Parallels with Human ADCs
title_short After-Death Communications (ADCs) from Non-Human Animals: Parallels with Human ADCs
title_sort after death communications adcs from non human animals parallels with human adcs
url https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/3087
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesgmatlock afterdeathcommunicationsadcsfromnonhumananimalsparallelswithhumanadcs
AT bethhilton afterdeathcommunicationsadcsfromnonhumananimalsparallelswithhumanadcs
AT rupertsheldrake afterdeathcommunicationsadcsfromnonhumananimalsparallelswithhumanadcs
AT pamsmart afterdeathcommunicationsadcsfromnonhumananimalsparallelswithhumanadcs
AT michaelnahm afterdeathcommunicationsadcsfromnonhumananimalsparallelswithhumanadcs