Hospital data may be more accurate than census data in estimating the ethnic composition of general practice populations

<strong>Background</strong> Equity of service provision by age, ethnicity and sex is a key aim of Government policy in the UK. The prevalence, natural history and management of common chronic conditions, such as diabetes and hypertension, vary between ethnic groups. Developing and monito...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sally Hull, Carol Rivas, Jacqui Bobby, Kambiz Boomla, John Robson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT 2009-06-01
Series:Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/718
_version_ 1828354825714139136
author Sally Hull
Carol Rivas
Jacqui Bobby
Kambiz Boomla
John Robson
author_facet Sally Hull
Carol Rivas
Jacqui Bobby
Kambiz Boomla
John Robson
author_sort Sally Hull
collection DOAJ
description <strong>Background</strong> Equity of service provision by age, ethnicity and sex is a key aim of Government policy in the UK. The prevalence, natural history and management of common chronic conditions, such as diabetes and hypertension, vary between ethnic groups. Developing and monitoring responsive local services requires accurate measures of ethnicity and language needs. Hence establishing the ethnic composition of GP populations is important. <strong>Objective</strong> To compare three methods of estimating the ethnic composition of GP registered populations in three east London primary care trusts (PCTs). <strong>Design</strong> Self-reported ethnicity, routinely collected at practice level (and considered the 'gold standard'), was compared with two indirect methods of attributing ethnicity. The indirect method currently used in the UK assigns ethnicity to GP populations based on geographical postcode attribution from the national census. A proposed alternative indirect method uses the ethnic breakdown of hospital admission data from practice lists to attribute ethnicity to the whole practice population. Comparisons were made between practice self-report recording and these two indirect methods. Bland_Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between methods of measurement. <strong>Results</strong> Data from 103 practices, covering 70% of the GP registered population, was used. The hospital admission method showed better agreement with practice self-report data than the census attributed method. For white populations Bland_Altman plots showed a mean difference of 1.4%(95% CI _14.9 to 17.7) between hospital admission and practice data, and a mean difference of 12.5% (95% CI _6.2 to 31.1) between census attributed and practice data. Differences were also found for south Asian and black populations. <strong>Conclusion</strong> Practice ethnicity measured using hospital attendance data is in closer agreement with practice recording of self-reported ethnicity than the census attribution method. Census attribution may provide misleading information on the ethnic composition of practice populations. We recommend that healthcare commissioners change to this method of measurement when practice self-report data is not available.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T02:31:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-755abc639db0465d991bf102868df466
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2058-4555
2058-4563
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T02:31:08Z
publishDate 2009-06-01
publisher BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
record_format Article
series Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
spelling doaj.art-755abc639db0465d991bf102868df4662022-12-22T02:17:40ZengBCS, The Chartered Institute for ITJournal of Innovation in Health Informatics2058-45552058-45632009-06-01172677810.14236/jhi.v17i2.718660Hospital data may be more accurate than census data in estimating the ethnic composition of general practice populationsSally HullCarol RivasJacqui BobbyKambiz BoomlaJohn Robson<strong>Background</strong> Equity of service provision by age, ethnicity and sex is a key aim of Government policy in the UK. The prevalence, natural history and management of common chronic conditions, such as diabetes and hypertension, vary between ethnic groups. Developing and monitoring responsive local services requires accurate measures of ethnicity and language needs. Hence establishing the ethnic composition of GP populations is important. <strong>Objective</strong> To compare three methods of estimating the ethnic composition of GP registered populations in three east London primary care trusts (PCTs). <strong>Design</strong> Self-reported ethnicity, routinely collected at practice level (and considered the 'gold standard'), was compared with two indirect methods of attributing ethnicity. The indirect method currently used in the UK assigns ethnicity to GP populations based on geographical postcode attribution from the national census. A proposed alternative indirect method uses the ethnic breakdown of hospital admission data from practice lists to attribute ethnicity to the whole practice population. Comparisons were made between practice self-report recording and these two indirect methods. Bland_Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between methods of measurement. <strong>Results</strong> Data from 103 practices, covering 70% of the GP registered population, was used. The hospital admission method showed better agreement with practice self-report data than the census attributed method. For white populations Bland_Altman plots showed a mean difference of 1.4%(95% CI _14.9 to 17.7) between hospital admission and practice data, and a mean difference of 12.5% (95% CI _6.2 to 31.1) between census attributed and practice data. Differences were also found for south Asian and black populations. <strong>Conclusion</strong> Practice ethnicity measured using hospital attendance data is in closer agreement with practice recording of self-reported ethnicity than the census attribution method. Census attribution may provide misleading information on the ethnic composition of practice populations. We recommend that healthcare commissioners change to this method of measurement when practice self-report data is not available.http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/718ethnicityethnic minority healthgeneral practice
spellingShingle Sally Hull
Carol Rivas
Jacqui Bobby
Kambiz Boomla
John Robson
Hospital data may be more accurate than census data in estimating the ethnic composition of general practice populations
Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
ethnicity
ethnic minority health
general practice
title Hospital data may be more accurate than census data in estimating the ethnic composition of general practice populations
title_full Hospital data may be more accurate than census data in estimating the ethnic composition of general practice populations
title_fullStr Hospital data may be more accurate than census data in estimating the ethnic composition of general practice populations
title_full_unstemmed Hospital data may be more accurate than census data in estimating the ethnic composition of general practice populations
title_short Hospital data may be more accurate than census data in estimating the ethnic composition of general practice populations
title_sort hospital data may be more accurate than census data in estimating the ethnic composition of general practice populations
topic ethnicity
ethnic minority health
general practice
url http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/718
work_keys_str_mv AT sallyhull hospitaldatamaybemoreaccuratethancensusdatainestimatingtheethniccompositionofgeneralpracticepopulations
AT carolrivas hospitaldatamaybemoreaccuratethancensusdatainestimatingtheethniccompositionofgeneralpracticepopulations
AT jacquibobby hospitaldatamaybemoreaccuratethancensusdatainestimatingtheethniccompositionofgeneralpracticepopulations
AT kambizboomla hospitaldatamaybemoreaccuratethancensusdatainestimatingtheethniccompositionofgeneralpracticepopulations
AT johnrobson hospitaldatamaybemoreaccuratethancensusdatainestimatingtheethniccompositionofgeneralpracticepopulations