Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 2 cm versus 6 cm Distance from the Pylorus

Background:The objective of this prospective randomized study was to study the effect of the residual gastric antrum size on the outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and to evaluate the effect of antral resection on weight reduction and complications after LSG. Patients and Methods: Sixty pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad A. Maklad*, Asmaa G. Rizk, Mohamed Y. Ahmed, Mohammed K. Elamaary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: South Valley University, Faculty of Medicine 2021-01-01
Series:SVU - International Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://svuijm.journals.ekb.eg/article_112020.html
_version_ 1818744715576606720
author Ahmad A. Maklad*
Asmaa G. Rizk
Mohamed Y. Ahmed
Mohammed K. Elamaary
author_facet Ahmad A. Maklad*
Asmaa G. Rizk
Mohamed Y. Ahmed
Mohammed K. Elamaary
author_sort Ahmad A. Maklad*
collection DOAJ
description Background:The objective of this prospective randomized study was to study the effect of the residual gastric antrum size on the outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and to evaluate the effect of antral resection on weight reduction and complications after LSG. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients underwent LSG as a primary bariatric procedure from November 2016 to March 2019 were randomized into two groups depending on the distance from the pylorus at which gastric division begins. In group (A), the distance was 2 cm from the pylorus, whereas the distance was 6 cm in group (B). The follow-up period was at least 6 months. Baseline and 3 and 6 month outcomes were analyzed including assessments of the percent excess weight lost (% EWL), reduction in BMI, morbidity, mortality, reoperations, quality of life, and co-morbidities. Result(s): Sixty patients included in this study, whose mean pre-operative age was (32.48± 7.92) years, three (5%) patients were males and 57(95%) patients were females with a mean pre-operative BMI was (53.45 ± 8.00) Kg/m2. In group A, the mean % EWL was (33.1 ± 7.15) and (51.37 ± 8.57) at 3 and 6 months respectively. In group B the mean % EWL was (29.29 ± 6.1) and (46.44 ± 9.85) at 3 and 6 months respectively. Patients with the first staple line started 2 cm from the pylorus had better weight loss than those started 6 cm from the pylorus after 3 and 6 months, but this difference statistically insignificant. Conclusion(s): LSG with 2 cm or 6 cm first staple firing from the pylorus produces significant weight loss after surgery. The 2 procedures are equally effective regarding %EWL, morbidity, quality of life, and improvement of co-morbiditieswith insignificant superiorities of 6 cm group.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T02:48:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7564ad9735124b8da731cf3bb6c786eb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2735-427X
2636-3402
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T02:48:43Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher South Valley University, Faculty of Medicine
record_format Article
series SVU - International Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-7564ad9735124b8da731cf3bb6c786eb2022-12-21T21:23:30ZengSouth Valley University, Faculty of MedicineSVU - International Journal of Medical Sciences2735-427X2636-34022021-01-01413040https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/svuijm.2021.112020 Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 2 cm versus 6 cm Distance from the PylorusAhmad A. Maklad*0Asmaa G. Rizk1Mohamed Y. Ahmed2 Mohammed K. Elamaary3Qeft Teaching Hospital, The general organization for teaching hospitals and institutesDepartment of General Surgery, Qena faculty of medicine, South Valley University, Qena, EgyptDepartment of General Surgery, Qena faculty of medicine, South Valley University, Qena, EgyptDepartment of General Surgery, Qena faculty of medicine, South Valley University, Qena, EgyptBackground:The objective of this prospective randomized study was to study the effect of the residual gastric antrum size on the outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and to evaluate the effect of antral resection on weight reduction and complications after LSG. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients underwent LSG as a primary bariatric procedure from November 2016 to March 2019 were randomized into two groups depending on the distance from the pylorus at which gastric division begins. In group (A), the distance was 2 cm from the pylorus, whereas the distance was 6 cm in group (B). The follow-up period was at least 6 months. Baseline and 3 and 6 month outcomes were analyzed including assessments of the percent excess weight lost (% EWL), reduction in BMI, morbidity, mortality, reoperations, quality of life, and co-morbidities. Result(s): Sixty patients included in this study, whose mean pre-operative age was (32.48± 7.92) years, three (5%) patients were males and 57(95%) patients were females with a mean pre-operative BMI was (53.45 ± 8.00) Kg/m2. In group A, the mean % EWL was (33.1 ± 7.15) and (51.37 ± 8.57) at 3 and 6 months respectively. In group B the mean % EWL was (29.29 ± 6.1) and (46.44 ± 9.85) at 3 and 6 months respectively. Patients with the first staple line started 2 cm from the pylorus had better weight loss than those started 6 cm from the pylorus after 3 and 6 months, but this difference statistically insignificant. Conclusion(s): LSG with 2 cm or 6 cm first staple firing from the pylorus produces significant weight loss after surgery. The 2 procedures are equally effective regarding %EWL, morbidity, quality of life, and improvement of co-morbiditieswith insignificant superiorities of 6 cm group.https://svuijm.journals.ekb.eg/article_112020.htmllaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; obesityexcess weight lossresidual gastric antrum
spellingShingle Ahmad A. Maklad*
Asmaa G. Rizk
Mohamed Y. Ahmed
Mohammed K. Elamaary
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 2 cm versus 6 cm Distance from the Pylorus
SVU - International Journal of Medical Sciences
laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; obesity
excess weight loss
residual gastric antrum
title Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 2 cm versus 6 cm Distance from the Pylorus
title_full Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 2 cm versus 6 cm Distance from the Pylorus
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 2 cm versus 6 cm Distance from the Pylorus
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 2 cm versus 6 cm Distance from the Pylorus
title_short Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 2 cm versus 6 cm Distance from the Pylorus
title_sort laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy 2 cm versus 6 cm distance from the pylorus
topic laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; obesity
excess weight loss
residual gastric antrum
url https://svuijm.journals.ekb.eg/article_112020.html
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadamaklad laparoscopicsleevegastrectomy2cmversus6cmdistancefromthepylorus
AT asmaagrizk laparoscopicsleevegastrectomy2cmversus6cmdistancefromthepylorus
AT mohamedyahmed laparoscopicsleevegastrectomy2cmversus6cmdistancefromthepylorus
AT mohammedkelamaary laparoscopicsleevegastrectomy2cmversus6cmdistancefromthepylorus