Consider the Source: The Impact of Social Mixing on Drylot Housed Steer Behavior and Productivity

Cattle are a social species in which social mixing can induce physical and psychosocial stress; however, the impact of social mixing on cattle welfare is unknown. Two different sources of genetically similar Angus crossbred steers were transported to the same feedlot and assigned to a pen where they...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Courtney L. Daigle, Jason E. Sawyer, Reinaldo F. Cooke, Jenny S. Jennings
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-09-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/18/2981
_version_ 1827727513943539712
author Courtney L. Daigle
Jason E. Sawyer
Reinaldo F. Cooke
Jenny S. Jennings
author_facet Courtney L. Daigle
Jason E. Sawyer
Reinaldo F. Cooke
Jenny S. Jennings
author_sort Courtney L. Daigle
collection DOAJ
description Cattle are a social species in which social mixing can induce physical and psychosocial stress; however, the impact of social mixing on cattle welfare is unknown. Two different sources of genetically similar Angus crossbred steers were transported to the same feedlot and assigned to a pen where they were either socially mixed or housed with individuals from their source herds. Social mixing did not impact average daily gains in pens, feed intake, or feed efficiency; pens of socially mixed steers were more active. Sources differed in their responses to social mixing. One source was unaffected, whereas social mixing negatively impacted productivity for the other source. Irrespective of social mixing, the sources differed in the amount of time per day they spent ruminating and drinking. Group analyses indicated that socially mixing two sources of feedlot steers did not negatively impact group productivity, yet the impacts that were observed at the individual level suggest that prior experiences may influence their ability to cope with social stress, emphasizing the importance of early-life experiences to long-term welfare and productivity. Social mixing was not universally detrimental to cattle welfare, and the source of cattle may have the greatest affect on their performance regardless of whether a social mixing event has occurred.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T23:06:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-75a030f448cd46d8b81bb6d7cd7a9384
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T23:06:30Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-75a030f448cd46d8b81bb6d7cd7a93842023-11-19T09:16:18ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152023-09-011318298110.3390/ani13182981Consider the Source: The Impact of Social Mixing on Drylot Housed Steer Behavior and ProductivityCourtney L. Daigle0Jason E. Sawyer1Reinaldo F. Cooke2Jenny S. Jennings3Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USAKing Ranch<sup>®</sup> Institute for Ranch Management, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363, USADepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USATexas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, Bushland, TX 79012, USACattle are a social species in which social mixing can induce physical and psychosocial stress; however, the impact of social mixing on cattle welfare is unknown. Two different sources of genetically similar Angus crossbred steers were transported to the same feedlot and assigned to a pen where they were either socially mixed or housed with individuals from their source herds. Social mixing did not impact average daily gains in pens, feed intake, or feed efficiency; pens of socially mixed steers were more active. Sources differed in their responses to social mixing. One source was unaffected, whereas social mixing negatively impacted productivity for the other source. Irrespective of social mixing, the sources differed in the amount of time per day they spent ruminating and drinking. Group analyses indicated that socially mixing two sources of feedlot steers did not negatively impact group productivity, yet the impacts that were observed at the individual level suggest that prior experiences may influence their ability to cope with social stress, emphasizing the importance of early-life experiences to long-term welfare and productivity. Social mixing was not universally detrimental to cattle welfare, and the source of cattle may have the greatest affect on their performance regardless of whether a social mixing event has occurred.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/18/2981social mixingfeedlotsteercattlecominglingwelfare
spellingShingle Courtney L. Daigle
Jason E. Sawyer
Reinaldo F. Cooke
Jenny S. Jennings
Consider the Source: The Impact of Social Mixing on Drylot Housed Steer Behavior and Productivity
Animals
social mixing
feedlot
steer
cattle
comingling
welfare
title Consider the Source: The Impact of Social Mixing on Drylot Housed Steer Behavior and Productivity
title_full Consider the Source: The Impact of Social Mixing on Drylot Housed Steer Behavior and Productivity
title_fullStr Consider the Source: The Impact of Social Mixing on Drylot Housed Steer Behavior and Productivity
title_full_unstemmed Consider the Source: The Impact of Social Mixing on Drylot Housed Steer Behavior and Productivity
title_short Consider the Source: The Impact of Social Mixing on Drylot Housed Steer Behavior and Productivity
title_sort consider the source the impact of social mixing on drylot housed steer behavior and productivity
topic social mixing
feedlot
steer
cattle
comingling
welfare
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/18/2981
work_keys_str_mv AT courtneyldaigle considerthesourcetheimpactofsocialmixingondrylothousedsteerbehaviorandproductivity
AT jasonesawyer considerthesourcetheimpactofsocialmixingondrylothousedsteerbehaviorandproductivity
AT reinaldofcooke considerthesourcetheimpactofsocialmixingondrylothousedsteerbehaviorandproductivity
AT jennysjennings considerthesourcetheimpactofsocialmixingondrylothousedsteerbehaviorandproductivity