Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care

Abstract Background Nurturing effective physician-patient relationships is essential to the provision of patient-centred care. Palliative care physicians may apply boundary-crossings or breaches in professional standards to nurture effective physician-patient relationships. Being highly individualiz...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chong Yao Ho, Nicole-Ann Lim, Nur Diana Abdul Rahman, Min Chiam, Jamie Xuelian Zhou, Gillian Li Gek Phua, Eng Koon Ong, Crystal Lim, Anupama Roy Chowdhury, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-04-01
Series:BMC Palliative Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01161-0
_version_ 1827966049479294976
author Chong Yao Ho
Nicole-Ann Lim
Nur Diana Abdul Rahman
Min Chiam
Jamie Xuelian Zhou
Gillian Li Gek Phua
Eng Koon Ong
Crystal Lim
Anupama Roy Chowdhury
Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
author_facet Chong Yao Ho
Nicole-Ann Lim
Nur Diana Abdul Rahman
Min Chiam
Jamie Xuelian Zhou
Gillian Li Gek Phua
Eng Koon Ong
Crystal Lim
Anupama Roy Chowdhury
Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
author_sort Chong Yao Ho
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Nurturing effective physician-patient relationships is essential to the provision of patient-centred care. Palliative care physicians may apply boundary-crossings or breaches in professional standards to nurture effective physician-patient relationships. Being highly individualized and shaped by the physician’s narratives, clinical experience, and contextual considerations, boundary-crossings are susceptible to ethical and professional violations. To better appreciate this concept, we employ the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) to map the effects of boundary-crossings on the physician’s belief systems. Methods As part of the Tool Design SEBA methodology, a Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) guided systematic scoping review was employed to guide the design of a semi-structured interview questionnaire with palliative care physicians. The transcripts were simultaneously content and thematically analysed. The themes and categories identified were combined using the Jigsaw Perspective and the resulting domains formed the basis for the discussion. Results The domains identified from the 12 semi-structured interviews were catalysts and boundary-crossings. Boundary-crossings attempt to address threats to a physician’s belief systems (catalysts) and are highly individualized. Employ of boundary-crossings depend on the physician’s sensitivity to these ‘catalysts’, their judgement and willingness to act, and their ability to balance various considerations and reflect on their actions and their ramifications. These experiences reshape belief systems, understandings of boundary-crossings and may influence decision-making and practice, underscoring the potential for greater professional breaches when unchecked. Conclusion Underlining its longitudinal effects, the Krishna Model underscores the importance of longitudinal support, assessment and oversight of palliative care physicians, and lays the foundation for a RToP-based tool to be employed within portfolios.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:43:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-75b2a39b7d624cbbbfc0473dc2e9214d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-684X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:43:57Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Palliative Care
spelling doaj.art-75b2a39b7d624cbbbfc0473dc2e9214d2023-04-16T11:27:59ZengBMCBMC Palliative Care1472-684X2023-04-012211910.1186/s12904-023-01161-0Physician-patient boundaries in palliative careChong Yao Ho0Nicole-Ann Lim1Nur Diana Abdul Rahman2Min Chiam3Jamie Xuelian Zhou4Gillian Li Gek Phua5Eng Koon Ong6Crystal Lim7Anupama Roy Chowdhury8Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna9Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of SingaporeYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of SingaporeDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre SingaporeDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre SingaporeDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre SingaporeDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre SingaporeYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of SingaporeMedical Social Services, Singapore General HospitalDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Singapore General HospitalYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of SingaporeAbstract Background Nurturing effective physician-patient relationships is essential to the provision of patient-centred care. Palliative care physicians may apply boundary-crossings or breaches in professional standards to nurture effective physician-patient relationships. Being highly individualized and shaped by the physician’s narratives, clinical experience, and contextual considerations, boundary-crossings are susceptible to ethical and professional violations. To better appreciate this concept, we employ the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) to map the effects of boundary-crossings on the physician’s belief systems. Methods As part of the Tool Design SEBA methodology, a Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) guided systematic scoping review was employed to guide the design of a semi-structured interview questionnaire with palliative care physicians. The transcripts were simultaneously content and thematically analysed. The themes and categories identified were combined using the Jigsaw Perspective and the resulting domains formed the basis for the discussion. Results The domains identified from the 12 semi-structured interviews were catalysts and boundary-crossings. Boundary-crossings attempt to address threats to a physician’s belief systems (catalysts) and are highly individualized. Employ of boundary-crossings depend on the physician’s sensitivity to these ‘catalysts’, their judgement and willingness to act, and their ability to balance various considerations and reflect on their actions and their ramifications. These experiences reshape belief systems, understandings of boundary-crossings and may influence decision-making and practice, underscoring the potential for greater professional breaches when unchecked. Conclusion Underlining its longitudinal effects, the Krishna Model underscores the importance of longitudinal support, assessment and oversight of palliative care physicians, and lays the foundation for a RToP-based tool to be employed within portfolios.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01161-0Boundary-crossingsPalliative carePhysician-patient relationshipDoctor-patient relationshipBoundariesProfessional identity formation
spellingShingle Chong Yao Ho
Nicole-Ann Lim
Nur Diana Abdul Rahman
Min Chiam
Jamie Xuelian Zhou
Gillian Li Gek Phua
Eng Koon Ong
Crystal Lim
Anupama Roy Chowdhury
Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care
BMC Palliative Care
Boundary-crossings
Palliative care
Physician-patient relationship
Doctor-patient relationship
Boundaries
Professional identity formation
title Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care
title_full Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care
title_fullStr Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care
title_full_unstemmed Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care
title_short Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care
title_sort physician patient boundaries in palliative care
topic Boundary-crossings
Palliative care
Physician-patient relationship
Doctor-patient relationship
Boundaries
Professional identity formation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01161-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chongyaoho physicianpatientboundariesinpalliativecare
AT nicoleannlim physicianpatientboundariesinpalliativecare
AT nurdianaabdulrahman physicianpatientboundariesinpalliativecare
AT minchiam physicianpatientboundariesinpalliativecare
AT jamiexuelianzhou physicianpatientboundariesinpalliativecare
AT gillianligekphua physicianpatientboundariesinpalliativecare
AT engkoonong physicianpatientboundariesinpalliativecare
AT crystallim physicianpatientboundariesinpalliativecare
AT anupamaroychowdhury physicianpatientboundariesinpalliativecare
AT lalitkumarradhakrishna physicianpatientboundariesinpalliativecare