Methods of sampling airborne fungi in working environments of waste treatment facilities
Objectives: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of a filter based sampling method and a high volume sampling method for sampling airborne culturable fungi present in waste sorting facilities. Material and Methods: Membrane filters method was compared with su...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
2016-06-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ijomeh.eu/Methods-of-sampling-airborne-fungi-in-working-environments-of-waste-treatment-facilities,58772,0,2.html |
_version_ | 1819084469898838016 |
---|---|
author | Kristýna Černá Zdeňka Wittlingerová Magdaléna Zimová Zdeněk Janovský |
author_facet | Kristýna Černá Zdeňka Wittlingerová Magdaléna Zimová Zdeněk Janovský |
author_sort | Kristýna Černá |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objectives: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of a filter based sampling method and a high volume sampling method for sampling airborne culturable fungi present in waste sorting facilities. Material and Methods: Membrane filters method was compared with surface air system method. The selected sampling methods were modified and tested in 2 plastic waste sorting facilities. Results: The total number of colony-forming units (CFU)/m3 of airborne fungi was dependent on the type of sampling device, on the time of sampling, which was carried out every hour from the beginning of the work shift, and on the type of cultivation medium (p < 0.001). Detected concentrations of airborne fungi ranged 2×102–1.7×106 CFU/m3 when using the membrane filters (MF) method, and 3×102–6.4×104 CFU/m3 when using the surface air system (SAS) method. Conclusions: Both methods showed comparable sensitivity to the fluctuations of the concentrations of airborne fungi during the work shifts. The SAS method is adequate for a fast indicative determination of concentration of airborne fungi. The MF method is suitable for thorough assessment of working environment contamination by airborne fungi. Therefore we recommend the MF method for the implementation of a uniform standard methodology of airborne fungi sampling in working environments of waste treatment facilities. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T20:48:58Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-75cee7589ffe4d2484cffca110f32870 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1232-1087 1896-494X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T20:48:58Z |
publishDate | 2016-06-01 |
publisher | Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health |
spelling | doaj.art-75cee7589ffe4d2484cffca110f328702022-12-21T18:50:46ZengNofer Institute of Occupational MedicineInternational Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health1232-10871896-494X2016-06-0129349350210.13075/ijomeh.1896.00568Methods of sampling airborne fungi in working environments of waste treatment facilitiesKristýna ČernáZdeňka WittlingerováMagdaléna ZimováZdeněk JanovskýObjectives: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of a filter based sampling method and a high volume sampling method for sampling airborne culturable fungi present in waste sorting facilities. Material and Methods: Membrane filters method was compared with surface air system method. The selected sampling methods were modified and tested in 2 plastic waste sorting facilities. Results: The total number of colony-forming units (CFU)/m3 of airborne fungi was dependent on the type of sampling device, on the time of sampling, which was carried out every hour from the beginning of the work shift, and on the type of cultivation medium (p < 0.001). Detected concentrations of airborne fungi ranged 2×102–1.7×106 CFU/m3 when using the membrane filters (MF) method, and 3×102–6.4×104 CFU/m3 when using the surface air system (SAS) method. Conclusions: Both methods showed comparable sensitivity to the fluctuations of the concentrations of airborne fungi during the work shifts. The SAS method is adequate for a fast indicative determination of concentration of airborne fungi. The MF method is suitable for thorough assessment of working environment contamination by airborne fungi. Therefore we recommend the MF method for the implementation of a uniform standard methodology of airborne fungi sampling in working environments of waste treatment facilities.http://ijomeh.eu/Methods-of-sampling-airborne-fungi-in-working-environments-of-waste-treatment-facilities,58772,0,2.htmlairborne fungiwaste sorting facilityfilter based bioaerosol samplingsurface air system methodworking environmentplastics |
spellingShingle | Kristýna Černá Zdeňka Wittlingerová Magdaléna Zimová Zdeněk Janovský Methods of sampling airborne fungi in working environments of waste treatment facilities International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health airborne fungi waste sorting facility filter based bioaerosol sampling surface air system method working environment plastics |
title | Methods of sampling airborne fungi in working environments of waste treatment facilities |
title_full | Methods of sampling airborne fungi in working environments of waste treatment facilities |
title_fullStr | Methods of sampling airborne fungi in working environments of waste treatment facilities |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods of sampling airborne fungi in working environments of waste treatment facilities |
title_short | Methods of sampling airborne fungi in working environments of waste treatment facilities |
title_sort | methods of sampling airborne fungi in working environments of waste treatment facilities |
topic | airborne fungi waste sorting facility filter based bioaerosol sampling surface air system method working environment plastics |
url | http://ijomeh.eu/Methods-of-sampling-airborne-fungi-in-working-environments-of-waste-treatment-facilities,58772,0,2.html |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kristynacerna methodsofsamplingairbornefungiinworkingenvironmentsofwastetreatmentfacilities AT zdenkawittlingerova methodsofsamplingairbornefungiinworkingenvironmentsofwastetreatmentfacilities AT magdalenazimova methodsofsamplingairbornefungiinworkingenvironmentsofwastetreatmentfacilities AT zdenekjanovsky methodsofsamplingairbornefungiinworkingenvironmentsofwastetreatmentfacilities |