A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios

Summary: Flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through perivascular spaces (PVSs) in the brain delivers nutrients, clears metabolic waste, and causes edema formation. Brain-wide imaging cannot resolve PVSs, and high-resolution methods cannot access deep tissue. However, theoretical models provide valuab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeffrey Tithof, Kimberly A.S. Boster, Peter A.R. Bork, Maiken Nedergaard, John H. Thomas, Douglas H. Kelley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-05-01
Series:iScience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222005284
_version_ 1811255359641223168
author Jeffrey Tithof
Kimberly A.S. Boster
Peter A.R. Bork
Maiken Nedergaard
John H. Thomas
Douglas H. Kelley
author_facet Jeffrey Tithof
Kimberly A.S. Boster
Peter A.R. Bork
Maiken Nedergaard
John H. Thomas
Douglas H. Kelley
author_sort Jeffrey Tithof
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through perivascular spaces (PVSs) in the brain delivers nutrients, clears metabolic waste, and causes edema formation. Brain-wide imaging cannot resolve PVSs, and high-resolution methods cannot access deep tissue. However, theoretical models provide valuable insight. We model the CSF pathway as a network of hydraulic resistances, using published parameter values. A few parameters (permeability of PVSs and the parenchyma, and dimensions of PVSs and astrocyte endfoot gaps) have wide uncertainties, so we focus on the limits of their ranges by analyzing different parametric scenarios. We identify low-resistance PVSs and high-resistance parenchyma as the only scenario that satisfies three essential criteria: that the flow be driven by a small pressure drop, exhibit good CSF perfusion throughout the cortex, and exhibit a substantial increase in flow during sleep. Our results point to the most important parameters, such as astrocyte endfoot gap dimensions, to be measured in future experiments.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T17:22:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-75d4dcf08bd64942a3620d965bf07b9b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-0042
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T17:22:35Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series iScience
spelling doaj.art-75d4dcf08bd64942a3620d965bf07b9b2022-12-22T03:23:25ZengElsevieriScience2589-00422022-05-01255104258A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenariosJeffrey Tithof0Kimberly A.S. Boster1Peter A.R. Bork2Maiken Nedergaard3John H. Thomas4Douglas H. Kelley5Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, 235 Hopeman Building, Rochester 14627, NY, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 111 Church St SE, Minneapolis 55455, MN, USA; Corresponding authorDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, 235 Hopeman Building, Rochester 14627, NY, USACenter for Translational Neuromedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Copenhagen, DenmarkCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Neuromedicine, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester 14642, NY, USADepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, 235 Hopeman Building, Rochester 14627, NY, USADepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, 235 Hopeman Building, Rochester 14627, NY, USASummary: Flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through perivascular spaces (PVSs) in the brain delivers nutrients, clears metabolic waste, and causes edema formation. Brain-wide imaging cannot resolve PVSs, and high-resolution methods cannot access deep tissue. However, theoretical models provide valuable insight. We model the CSF pathway as a network of hydraulic resistances, using published parameter values. A few parameters (permeability of PVSs and the parenchyma, and dimensions of PVSs and astrocyte endfoot gaps) have wide uncertainties, so we focus on the limits of their ranges by analyzing different parametric scenarios. We identify low-resistance PVSs and high-resistance parenchyma as the only scenario that satisfies three essential criteria: that the flow be driven by a small pressure drop, exhibit good CSF perfusion throughout the cortex, and exhibit a substantial increase in flow during sleep. Our results point to the most important parameters, such as astrocyte endfoot gap dimensions, to be measured in future experiments.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222005284NeuroscienceSystems neuroscienceIn silico biology
spellingShingle Jeffrey Tithof
Kimberly A.S. Boster
Peter A.R. Bork
Maiken Nedergaard
John H. Thomas
Douglas H. Kelley
A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios
iScience
Neuroscience
Systems neuroscience
In silico biology
title A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios
title_full A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios
title_fullStr A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios
title_full_unstemmed A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios
title_short A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios
title_sort network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally motivated parametric scenarios
topic Neuroscience
Systems neuroscience
In silico biology
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222005284
work_keys_str_mv AT jeffreytithof anetworkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios
AT kimberlyasboster anetworkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios
AT peterarbork anetworkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios
AT maikennedergaard anetworkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios
AT johnhthomas anetworkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios
AT douglashkelley anetworkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios
AT jeffreytithof networkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios
AT kimberlyasboster networkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios
AT peterarbork networkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios
AT maikennedergaard networkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios
AT johnhthomas networkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios
AT douglashkelley networkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios