A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios
Summary: Flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through perivascular spaces (PVSs) in the brain delivers nutrients, clears metabolic waste, and causes edema formation. Brain-wide imaging cannot resolve PVSs, and high-resolution methods cannot access deep tissue. However, theoretical models provide valuab...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-05-01
|
Series: | iScience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222005284 |
_version_ | 1811255359641223168 |
---|---|
author | Jeffrey Tithof Kimberly A.S. Boster Peter A.R. Bork Maiken Nedergaard John H. Thomas Douglas H. Kelley |
author_facet | Jeffrey Tithof Kimberly A.S. Boster Peter A.R. Bork Maiken Nedergaard John H. Thomas Douglas H. Kelley |
author_sort | Jeffrey Tithof |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Summary: Flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through perivascular spaces (PVSs) in the brain delivers nutrients, clears metabolic waste, and causes edema formation. Brain-wide imaging cannot resolve PVSs, and high-resolution methods cannot access deep tissue. However, theoretical models provide valuable insight. We model the CSF pathway as a network of hydraulic resistances, using published parameter values. A few parameters (permeability of PVSs and the parenchyma, and dimensions of PVSs and astrocyte endfoot gaps) have wide uncertainties, so we focus on the limits of their ranges by analyzing different parametric scenarios. We identify low-resistance PVSs and high-resistance parenchyma as the only scenario that satisfies three essential criteria: that the flow be driven by a small pressure drop, exhibit good CSF perfusion throughout the cortex, and exhibit a substantial increase in flow during sleep. Our results point to the most important parameters, such as astrocyte endfoot gap dimensions, to be measured in future experiments. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T17:22:35Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-75d4dcf08bd64942a3620d965bf07b9b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2589-0042 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T17:22:35Z |
publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | iScience |
spelling | doaj.art-75d4dcf08bd64942a3620d965bf07b9b2022-12-22T03:23:25ZengElsevieriScience2589-00422022-05-01255104258A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenariosJeffrey Tithof0Kimberly A.S. Boster1Peter A.R. Bork2Maiken Nedergaard3John H. Thomas4Douglas H. Kelley5Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, 235 Hopeman Building, Rochester 14627, NY, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 111 Church St SE, Minneapolis 55455, MN, USA; Corresponding authorDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, 235 Hopeman Building, Rochester 14627, NY, USACenter for Translational Neuromedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Copenhagen, DenmarkCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Neuromedicine, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester 14642, NY, USADepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, 235 Hopeman Building, Rochester 14627, NY, USADepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, 235 Hopeman Building, Rochester 14627, NY, USASummary: Flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through perivascular spaces (PVSs) in the brain delivers nutrients, clears metabolic waste, and causes edema formation. Brain-wide imaging cannot resolve PVSs, and high-resolution methods cannot access deep tissue. However, theoretical models provide valuable insight. We model the CSF pathway as a network of hydraulic resistances, using published parameter values. A few parameters (permeability of PVSs and the parenchyma, and dimensions of PVSs and astrocyte endfoot gaps) have wide uncertainties, so we focus on the limits of their ranges by analyzing different parametric scenarios. We identify low-resistance PVSs and high-resistance parenchyma as the only scenario that satisfies three essential criteria: that the flow be driven by a small pressure drop, exhibit good CSF perfusion throughout the cortex, and exhibit a substantial increase in flow during sleep. Our results point to the most important parameters, such as astrocyte endfoot gap dimensions, to be measured in future experiments.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222005284NeuroscienceSystems neuroscienceIn silico biology |
spellingShingle | Jeffrey Tithof Kimberly A.S. Boster Peter A.R. Bork Maiken Nedergaard John H. Thomas Douglas H. Kelley A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios iScience Neuroscience Systems neuroscience In silico biology |
title | A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios |
title_full | A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios |
title_fullStr | A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios |
title_full_unstemmed | A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios |
title_short | A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios |
title_sort | network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally motivated parametric scenarios |
topic | Neuroscience Systems neuroscience In silico biology |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222005284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeffreytithof anetworkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios AT kimberlyasboster anetworkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios AT peterarbork anetworkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios AT maikennedergaard anetworkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios AT johnhthomas anetworkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios AT douglashkelley anetworkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios AT jeffreytithof networkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios AT kimberlyasboster networkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios AT peterarbork networkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios AT maikennedergaard networkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios AT johnhthomas networkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios AT douglashkelley networkmodelofglymphaticflowunderdifferentexperimentallymotivatedparametricscenarios |