Participatory Guarantee Systems, a more inclusive organic certification alternative? Unboxing certification costs and farm inspections in PGS based on a case study approach

The importance of Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) as an alternative organic certification to third-party certification (TPC) has grown remarkably in recent years. PGS are argued to be less costly than TPC, and adopt the exchange of advice and knowledge as a key element of farm inspections. For...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sonja Kaufmann, Nikolaus Hruschka, Christian R. Vogl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1176057/full
_version_ 1797803735175397376
author Sonja Kaufmann
Nikolaus Hruschka
Christian R. Vogl
author_facet Sonja Kaufmann
Nikolaus Hruschka
Christian R. Vogl
author_sort Sonja Kaufmann
collection DOAJ
description The importance of Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) as an alternative organic certification to third-party certification (TPC) has grown remarkably in recent years. PGS are argued to be less costly than TPC, and adopt the exchange of advice and knowledge as a key element of farm inspections. For these reasons, PGS are promoted as being more accessible for smallholder farmers in low-income countries and as a tool for supporting organic conversion and standard compliance, and ultimately contributing to food system sustainability. PGS certification costs have not yet been studied thoroughly and empirical studies on PGS farm inspections are rare. This paper applies a mixed-methods case study approach in a Costa Rican PGS initiative and explores explicit and implicit PGS certification costs and PGS farm inspections. The framework for assessing actor participation in PGS and transaction cost theory were used as the theoretical foundation. Semi-structured interviews (n = 10), PGS member surveys (n = 17), and participant observations of PGS farm inspections (n = 11) were conducted and complemented with data from internal documents and informal interviews. The results showed that reduced explicit costs for PGS certification were accompanied by substantial implicit costs in terms of the time dedicated to the PGS certification process. These implicit costs were largely attributed to the legal requirements for PGS, and were borne by only a few members, resulting in differences in total certification costs between PGS members. Despite legal formalization, information exchange was an important part of PGS farm inspections. Against the backdrop of small audit teams and low participation in farm inspections, PGS members implementing farm inspections nurtured transparency and an exchange of experience within the PGS. The study provides novel insight into PGS, and defines cost components and PGS characteristics affecting PGS certification costs that may also be relevant to other PGS initiatives and related fields of action.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T05:26:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-75d50a83eaa8464eb119a4dda02e8e37
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2571-581X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T05:26:30Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
spelling doaj.art-75d50a83eaa8464eb119a4dda02e8e372023-06-15T05:52:37ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems2571-581X2023-06-01710.3389/fsufs.2023.11760571176057Participatory Guarantee Systems, a more inclusive organic certification alternative? Unboxing certification costs and farm inspections in PGS based on a case study approachSonja KaufmannNikolaus HruschkaChristian R. VoglThe importance of Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) as an alternative organic certification to third-party certification (TPC) has grown remarkably in recent years. PGS are argued to be less costly than TPC, and adopt the exchange of advice and knowledge as a key element of farm inspections. For these reasons, PGS are promoted as being more accessible for smallholder farmers in low-income countries and as a tool for supporting organic conversion and standard compliance, and ultimately contributing to food system sustainability. PGS certification costs have not yet been studied thoroughly and empirical studies on PGS farm inspections are rare. This paper applies a mixed-methods case study approach in a Costa Rican PGS initiative and explores explicit and implicit PGS certification costs and PGS farm inspections. The framework for assessing actor participation in PGS and transaction cost theory were used as the theoretical foundation. Semi-structured interviews (n = 10), PGS member surveys (n = 17), and participant observations of PGS farm inspections (n = 11) were conducted and complemented with data from internal documents and informal interviews. The results showed that reduced explicit costs for PGS certification were accompanied by substantial implicit costs in terms of the time dedicated to the PGS certification process. These implicit costs were largely attributed to the legal requirements for PGS, and were borne by only a few members, resulting in differences in total certification costs between PGS members. Despite legal formalization, information exchange was an important part of PGS farm inspections. Against the backdrop of small audit teams and low participation in farm inspections, PGS members implementing farm inspections nurtured transparency and an exchange of experience within the PGS. The study provides novel insight into PGS, and defines cost components and PGS characteristics affecting PGS certification costs that may also be relevant to other PGS initiatives and related fields of action.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1176057/fullparticipatory guarantee systemsorganic certificationtransaction costsfarm inspectionpeer learningcertification costs
spellingShingle Sonja Kaufmann
Nikolaus Hruschka
Christian R. Vogl
Participatory Guarantee Systems, a more inclusive organic certification alternative? Unboxing certification costs and farm inspections in PGS based on a case study approach
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
participatory guarantee systems
organic certification
transaction costs
farm inspection
peer learning
certification costs
title Participatory Guarantee Systems, a more inclusive organic certification alternative? Unboxing certification costs and farm inspections in PGS based on a case study approach
title_full Participatory Guarantee Systems, a more inclusive organic certification alternative? Unboxing certification costs and farm inspections in PGS based on a case study approach
title_fullStr Participatory Guarantee Systems, a more inclusive organic certification alternative? Unboxing certification costs and farm inspections in PGS based on a case study approach
title_full_unstemmed Participatory Guarantee Systems, a more inclusive organic certification alternative? Unboxing certification costs and farm inspections in PGS based on a case study approach
title_short Participatory Guarantee Systems, a more inclusive organic certification alternative? Unboxing certification costs and farm inspections in PGS based on a case study approach
title_sort participatory guarantee systems a more inclusive organic certification alternative unboxing certification costs and farm inspections in pgs based on a case study approach
topic participatory guarantee systems
organic certification
transaction costs
farm inspection
peer learning
certification costs
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1176057/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sonjakaufmann participatoryguaranteesystemsamoreinclusiveorganiccertificationalternativeunboxingcertificationcostsandfarminspectionsinpgsbasedonacasestudyapproach
AT nikolaushruschka participatoryguaranteesystemsamoreinclusiveorganiccertificationalternativeunboxingcertificationcostsandfarminspectionsinpgsbasedonacasestudyapproach
AT christianrvogl participatoryguaranteesystemsamoreinclusiveorganiccertificationalternativeunboxingcertificationcostsandfarminspectionsinpgsbasedonacasestudyapproach