Letter to the editor regarding the article ‘EFSA’s toxicological assessment of aspartame: was it even-handedly trying to identify possible unreliable positives and unreliable negatives?’
Abstract This letter is in response to a recent paper by Millstone and Dawson (2019) in which the authors criticise the re-evaluation of the high intensity sweetener aspartame in 2013 by the former EFSA’s Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food, on the grounds that EFSA did not fo...
Main Authors: | George E. N. Kass, Federica Lodi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Archives of Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13690-020-0395-4 |
Similar Items
-
EFSA’s toxicological assessment of aspartame: was it even-handedly trying to identify possible unreliable positives and unreliable negatives?
by: Erik Paul Millstone, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Can aspartame-sweetened products safely help with weight loss?
by: Adam Wojcieszonek, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Aspartame—True or False? Narrative Review of Safety Analysis of General Use in Products
by: Kamila Czarnecka, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Aspartame and cancer – new evidence for causation
by: Philip J. Landrigan, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
The impact of non-caloric artificial sweetener aspartame on female reproductive system in mice model
by: Ab Qayoom Naik, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)