A Comparison of Solvent-Based Extraction Methods to Assess the Central Carbon Metabolites in Mouse Bone and Muscle

The identification of endogenous metabolites has great potential for understanding the underlying tissue processes occurring in either a homeostatic or a diseased state. The application of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolomics on musculoskeletal tissue samples has gained tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniela B. Dias, Raphaela Fritsche-Guenther, Friederike Gutmann, Georg N. Duda, Jennifer Kirwan, Patrina S. P. Poh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Metabolites
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/12/5/453
_version_ 1827667924887797760
author Daniela B. Dias
Raphaela Fritsche-Guenther
Friederike Gutmann
Georg N. Duda
Jennifer Kirwan
Patrina S. P. Poh
author_facet Daniela B. Dias
Raphaela Fritsche-Guenther
Friederike Gutmann
Georg N. Duda
Jennifer Kirwan
Patrina S. P. Poh
author_sort Daniela B. Dias
collection DOAJ
description The identification of endogenous metabolites has great potential for understanding the underlying tissue processes occurring in either a homeostatic or a diseased state. The application of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolomics on musculoskeletal tissue samples has gained traction. However, limited comparison studies exist evaluating the sensitivity, reproducibility, and robustness of the various existing extraction protocols for musculoskeletal tissues. Here, we evaluated polar metabolite extraction from bone and muscle of mouse origin. The extraction methods compared were (1) modified Bligh–Dyer (mBD), (2) low chloroform (CHCl<sub>3</sub>)-modified Bligh–Dyer (mBD-low), and (3) modified Matyash (mMat). In particular, the central carbon metabolites (CCM) appear to be relevant for musculoskeletal regeneration, given their role in energy metabolism. However, the sensitivity, reproducibility, and robustness of these methods for detecting targeted polar CCM remains unknown. Overall, the extraction of metabolites using the mBD, mBD-low, and mMat methods appears sufficiently robust and reproducible for bone, with the mBD method slightly bettering the mBD-low and mMat methods. Furthermore, mBD, mBD-low, and mMat were sufficiently sensitive in detecting polar metabolites extracted from mouse muscle; however, they lacked repeatability. This study highlights the need for a re-thinking, towards a tissue-specific optimization of methods for metabolite extractions, ensuring sufficient sensitivity, repeatability, and robustness.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:26:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-75f3879b38034311a2629ea7b4a2af29
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2218-1989
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:26:05Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Metabolites
spelling doaj.art-75f3879b38034311a2629ea7b4a2af292023-11-23T12:07:41ZengMDPI AGMetabolites2218-19892022-05-0112545310.3390/metabo12050453A Comparison of Solvent-Based Extraction Methods to Assess the Central Carbon Metabolites in Mouse Bone and MuscleDaniela B. Dias0Raphaela Fritsche-Guenther1Friederike Gutmann2Georg N. Duda3Jennifer Kirwan4Patrina S. P. Poh5Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, GermanyBerlin Institute of Health at Charité—BIH Metabolomics Platform, 10178 Berlin, GermanyBerlin Institute of Health at Charité—BIH Metabolomics Platform, 10178 Berlin, GermanyJulius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, GermanyBerlin Institute of Health at Charité—BIH Metabolomics Platform, 10178 Berlin, GermanyJulius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, GermanyThe identification of endogenous metabolites has great potential for understanding the underlying tissue processes occurring in either a homeostatic or a diseased state. The application of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolomics on musculoskeletal tissue samples has gained traction. However, limited comparison studies exist evaluating the sensitivity, reproducibility, and robustness of the various existing extraction protocols for musculoskeletal tissues. Here, we evaluated polar metabolite extraction from bone and muscle of mouse origin. The extraction methods compared were (1) modified Bligh–Dyer (mBD), (2) low chloroform (CHCl<sub>3</sub>)-modified Bligh–Dyer (mBD-low), and (3) modified Matyash (mMat). In particular, the central carbon metabolites (CCM) appear to be relevant for musculoskeletal regeneration, given their role in energy metabolism. However, the sensitivity, reproducibility, and robustness of these methods for detecting targeted polar CCM remains unknown. Overall, the extraction of metabolites using the mBD, mBD-low, and mMat methods appears sufficiently robust and reproducible for bone, with the mBD method slightly bettering the mBD-low and mMat methods. Furthermore, mBD, mBD-low, and mMat were sufficiently sensitive in detecting polar metabolites extracted from mouse muscle; however, they lacked repeatability. This study highlights the need for a re-thinking, towards a tissue-specific optimization of methods for metabolite extractions, ensuring sufficient sensitivity, repeatability, and robustness.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/12/5/453musclebonemetabolitesGC-MScentral carbon metabolismmetabolomics
spellingShingle Daniela B. Dias
Raphaela Fritsche-Guenther
Friederike Gutmann
Georg N. Duda
Jennifer Kirwan
Patrina S. P. Poh
A Comparison of Solvent-Based Extraction Methods to Assess the Central Carbon Metabolites in Mouse Bone and Muscle
Metabolites
muscle
bone
metabolites
GC-MS
central carbon metabolism
metabolomics
title A Comparison of Solvent-Based Extraction Methods to Assess the Central Carbon Metabolites in Mouse Bone and Muscle
title_full A Comparison of Solvent-Based Extraction Methods to Assess the Central Carbon Metabolites in Mouse Bone and Muscle
title_fullStr A Comparison of Solvent-Based Extraction Methods to Assess the Central Carbon Metabolites in Mouse Bone and Muscle
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Solvent-Based Extraction Methods to Assess the Central Carbon Metabolites in Mouse Bone and Muscle
title_short A Comparison of Solvent-Based Extraction Methods to Assess the Central Carbon Metabolites in Mouse Bone and Muscle
title_sort comparison of solvent based extraction methods to assess the central carbon metabolites in mouse bone and muscle
topic muscle
bone
metabolites
GC-MS
central carbon metabolism
metabolomics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/12/5/453
work_keys_str_mv AT danielabdias acomparisonofsolventbasedextractionmethodstoassessthecentralcarbonmetabolitesinmouseboneandmuscle
AT raphaelafritscheguenther acomparisonofsolventbasedextractionmethodstoassessthecentralcarbonmetabolitesinmouseboneandmuscle
AT friederikegutmann acomparisonofsolventbasedextractionmethodstoassessthecentralcarbonmetabolitesinmouseboneandmuscle
AT georgnduda acomparisonofsolventbasedextractionmethodstoassessthecentralcarbonmetabolitesinmouseboneandmuscle
AT jenniferkirwan acomparisonofsolventbasedextractionmethodstoassessthecentralcarbonmetabolitesinmouseboneandmuscle
AT patrinasppoh acomparisonofsolventbasedextractionmethodstoassessthecentralcarbonmetabolitesinmouseboneandmuscle
AT danielabdias comparisonofsolventbasedextractionmethodstoassessthecentralcarbonmetabolitesinmouseboneandmuscle
AT raphaelafritscheguenther comparisonofsolventbasedextractionmethodstoassessthecentralcarbonmetabolitesinmouseboneandmuscle
AT friederikegutmann comparisonofsolventbasedextractionmethodstoassessthecentralcarbonmetabolitesinmouseboneandmuscle
AT georgnduda comparisonofsolventbasedextractionmethodstoassessthecentralcarbonmetabolitesinmouseboneandmuscle
AT jenniferkirwan comparisonofsolventbasedextractionmethodstoassessthecentralcarbonmetabolitesinmouseboneandmuscle
AT patrinasppoh comparisonofsolventbasedextractionmethodstoassessthecentralcarbonmetabolitesinmouseboneandmuscle