Combining Multiple Remediation Techniques Is Effective for the Remediation of Eutrophic Flowing Water

Dredging, adsorbent inactivation, and phytoremediation are commonly used to control internal nitrogen and phosphorus sediment loads in eutrophic still-water ecosystems, such as lakes and ponds. However, the effectiveness of these remediation techniques has not been verified for rivers, lakes, and re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ran Luo, Wei Li, Jiayou Zhong, Taotao Dai, Jinfu Liu, Xiaoliang Zhang, Yuwei Chen, Guiqing Gao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-03-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/16/6/858
_version_ 1797239032713838592
author Ran Luo
Wei Li
Jiayou Zhong
Taotao Dai
Jinfu Liu
Xiaoliang Zhang
Yuwei Chen
Guiqing Gao
author_facet Ran Luo
Wei Li
Jiayou Zhong
Taotao Dai
Jinfu Liu
Xiaoliang Zhang
Yuwei Chen
Guiqing Gao
author_sort Ran Luo
collection DOAJ
description Dredging, adsorbent inactivation, and phytoremediation are commonly used to control internal nitrogen and phosphorus sediment loads in eutrophic still-water ecosystems, such as lakes and ponds. However, the effectiveness of these remediation techniques has not been verified for rivers, lakes, and reservoirs with large disturbances. In this study, a calcium-loaded clay granular adsorbent (CRB) was prepared as an alternative to commercial adsorbents, and an experiment was conducted on the ecological restoration effects of both dredging and adsorbent single treatments as well as combined treatments on eutrophic flowing water. The enhancement effect of phytoremediation on the above restoration techniques was investigated. The results indicated that CRB inactivation treatment reduced the phosphorus and turbidity of the water by 63% and 80%, respectively and increased the total nitrogen and permanganate index (COD<sub>Mn</sub>) by 25% and 101% before phytoremediation, respectively compared to the control group. There were no significant differences in the nutrient indexes of the sediment and water between the dredging treatment and the control group, but dredging enhanced the effect of the CRB treatment. Compared with the CRB treatment, the total nitrogen and COD<sub>Mn</sub> of water in the dredging and combined CRB treatments decreased by 13% and 15%, respectively. Phytoremediation significantly improved the effectiveness of the dredging and adsorbent treatments, both individually and in combination. Additionally, there were notable differences in the growth rates of the submerged plants and the contents of different phosphorus speciation among the plant species. Selecting suitable plant species is recommended when implementing phytoremediation methods. This study highlights that the combination of multiple restoration techniques is effective for eutrophic flowing water. The results provide a guide for the ecological restoration of flowing water.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T17:45:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7604e58b4371454cacf95460131ba7ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T17:45:05Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-7604e58b4371454cacf95460131ba7ba2024-03-27T14:08:22ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412024-03-0116685810.3390/w16060858Combining Multiple Remediation Techniques Is Effective for the Remediation of Eutrophic Flowing WaterRan Luo0Wei Li1Jiayou Zhong2Taotao Dai3Jinfu Liu4Xiaoliang Zhang5Yuwei Chen6Guiqing Gao7Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Intelligent Monitoring and Integrated Restoration of Watershed Ecosystem, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, ChinaJiangxi Key Laboratory for Intelligent Monitoring and Integrated Restoration of Watershed Ecosystem, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, ChinaJiangxi Provincial Eco-Hydraulic Technology Innovation Center of Poyang Lake Basin, Jiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering, Nanchang 330029, ChinaJiangxi Provincial Eco-Hydraulic Technology Innovation Center of Poyang Lake Basin, Jiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering, Nanchang 330029, ChinaJiangxi Key Laboratory for Intelligent Monitoring and Integrated Restoration of Watershed Ecosystem, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, ChinaJiangxi Key Laboratory for Intelligent Monitoring and Integrated Restoration of Watershed Ecosystem, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, ChinaJiangxi Key Laboratory for Intelligent Monitoring and Integrated Restoration of Watershed Ecosystem, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, ChinaJiangxi Key Laboratory for Intelligent Monitoring and Integrated Restoration of Watershed Ecosystem, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, ChinaDredging, adsorbent inactivation, and phytoremediation are commonly used to control internal nitrogen and phosphorus sediment loads in eutrophic still-water ecosystems, such as lakes and ponds. However, the effectiveness of these remediation techniques has not been verified for rivers, lakes, and reservoirs with large disturbances. In this study, a calcium-loaded clay granular adsorbent (CRB) was prepared as an alternative to commercial adsorbents, and an experiment was conducted on the ecological restoration effects of both dredging and adsorbent single treatments as well as combined treatments on eutrophic flowing water. The enhancement effect of phytoremediation on the above restoration techniques was investigated. The results indicated that CRB inactivation treatment reduced the phosphorus and turbidity of the water by 63% and 80%, respectively and increased the total nitrogen and permanganate index (COD<sub>Mn</sub>) by 25% and 101% before phytoremediation, respectively compared to the control group. There were no significant differences in the nutrient indexes of the sediment and water between the dredging treatment and the control group, but dredging enhanced the effect of the CRB treatment. Compared with the CRB treatment, the total nitrogen and COD<sub>Mn</sub> of water in the dredging and combined CRB treatments decreased by 13% and 15%, respectively. Phytoremediation significantly improved the effectiveness of the dredging and adsorbent treatments, both individually and in combination. Additionally, there were notable differences in the growth rates of the submerged plants and the contents of different phosphorus speciation among the plant species. Selecting suitable plant species is recommended when implementing phytoremediation methods. This study highlights that the combination of multiple restoration techniques is effective for eutrophic flowing water. The results provide a guide for the ecological restoration of flowing water.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/16/6/858eutrophicationdredgesediment inactivationphytoremediationphosphorus
spellingShingle Ran Luo
Wei Li
Jiayou Zhong
Taotao Dai
Jinfu Liu
Xiaoliang Zhang
Yuwei Chen
Guiqing Gao
Combining Multiple Remediation Techniques Is Effective for the Remediation of Eutrophic Flowing Water
Water
eutrophication
dredge
sediment inactivation
phytoremediation
phosphorus
title Combining Multiple Remediation Techniques Is Effective for the Remediation of Eutrophic Flowing Water
title_full Combining Multiple Remediation Techniques Is Effective for the Remediation of Eutrophic Flowing Water
title_fullStr Combining Multiple Remediation Techniques Is Effective for the Remediation of Eutrophic Flowing Water
title_full_unstemmed Combining Multiple Remediation Techniques Is Effective for the Remediation of Eutrophic Flowing Water
title_short Combining Multiple Remediation Techniques Is Effective for the Remediation of Eutrophic Flowing Water
title_sort combining multiple remediation techniques is effective for the remediation of eutrophic flowing water
topic eutrophication
dredge
sediment inactivation
phytoremediation
phosphorus
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/16/6/858
work_keys_str_mv AT ranluo combiningmultipleremediationtechniquesiseffectivefortheremediationofeutrophicflowingwater
AT weili combiningmultipleremediationtechniquesiseffectivefortheremediationofeutrophicflowingwater
AT jiayouzhong combiningmultipleremediationtechniquesiseffectivefortheremediationofeutrophicflowingwater
AT taotaodai combiningmultipleremediationtechniquesiseffectivefortheremediationofeutrophicflowingwater
AT jinfuliu combiningmultipleremediationtechniquesiseffectivefortheremediationofeutrophicflowingwater
AT xiaoliangzhang combiningmultipleremediationtechniquesiseffectivefortheremediationofeutrophicflowingwater
AT yuweichen combiningmultipleremediationtechniquesiseffectivefortheremediationofeutrophicflowingwater
AT guiqinggao combiningmultipleremediationtechniquesiseffectivefortheremediationofeutrophicflowingwater