Comparison of flexible, open with semi-rigid, closed annuloplasty-rings for mitral valve repair

Abstract Background Mitral regurgitation is a frequent valvular disease, with an increasing prevalence. We analysed the long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair procedures conducted over the last 10 years in our clinic using almost exclusively two different annuloplasty ring types. Methods A single...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayse Cetinkaya, Maryam Waheed, Karin Bramlage, Oliver Johannes Liakopoulos, Mohamed Zeriouh, Stefan Hein, Peter Bramlage, Markus Schönburg, Yeong-Hoon Choi, Manfred Richter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01405-1
_version_ 1818416558809022464
author Ayse Cetinkaya
Maryam Waheed
Karin Bramlage
Oliver Johannes Liakopoulos
Mohamed Zeriouh
Stefan Hein
Peter Bramlage
Markus Schönburg
Yeong-Hoon Choi
Manfred Richter
author_facet Ayse Cetinkaya
Maryam Waheed
Karin Bramlage
Oliver Johannes Liakopoulos
Mohamed Zeriouh
Stefan Hein
Peter Bramlage
Markus Schönburg
Yeong-Hoon Choi
Manfred Richter
author_sort Ayse Cetinkaya
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Mitral regurgitation is a frequent valvular disease, with an increasing prevalence. We analysed the long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair procedures conducted over the last 10 years in our clinic using almost exclusively two different annuloplasty ring types. Methods A single-centre, retrospective analysis of mitral valve surgeries conducted between January 2005 and December 2015 for patients undergoing first-line mitral valve repair with either open (Cosgrove) or closed (CE Physio / Physio II) annuloplasty (OA or CA, respectively) rings. Results In total, 1120 patient documentations were available of which 528 underwent OA and 592 patients CA. The median age of patients was 64.0 years and 41.1% were female. The majority of these patients underwent the procedure because of degenerative valve disease. Rates of successful repair were about 90%, 72 h procedural mortality was 0.6% and the rate of re-intervention was 0.6% within the first 30 days. Functional (mitral regurgitation, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic diameter and New York Heart Association class) as well as hard outcomes were comparable. 77.7 and 74.4% of patients were alive at the 10-year follow-up in the OA and CA groups, respectively. Upon multivariable adjustment, the hazard ratio was 0.926 (95% CI: 0.642–1.3135; p = 0.681). Conclusions The functional outcome and survival rates up to 10 years after mitral valve repair were comparable using open and closed annuloplasty rings. Whether this means these rings are interchangeable or a carefully selection of the best-for-the-patient devices will be subject of future investigations.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T11:52:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76155437deba4df3affe765da18aca3b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-8090
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T11:52:48Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-76155437deba4df3affe765da18aca3b2022-12-21T23:02:14ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902021-03-0116111110.1186/s13019-021-01405-1Comparison of flexible, open with semi-rigid, closed annuloplasty-rings for mitral valve repairAyse Cetinkaya0Maryam Waheed1Karin Bramlage2Oliver Johannes Liakopoulos3Mohamed Zeriouh4Stefan Hein5Peter Bramlage6Markus Schönburg7Yeong-Hoon Choi8Manfred Richter9Department of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Heart Center Bad Nauheim, Campus of the University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig Universiy GiessenDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Heart Center Bad Nauheim, Campus of the University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig Universiy GiessenInstitute for Pharmacology and Preventive MedicineDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Heart Center Bad Nauheim, Campus of the University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig Universiy GiessenDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Heart Center Bad Nauheim, Campus of the University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig Universiy GiessenDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Heart Center Bad Nauheim, Campus of the University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig Universiy GiessenInstitute for Pharmacology and Preventive MedicineDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Heart Center Bad Nauheim, Campus of the University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig Universiy GiessenDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Heart Center Bad Nauheim, Campus of the University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig Universiy GiessenDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Heart Center Bad Nauheim, Campus of the University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig Universiy GiessenAbstract Background Mitral regurgitation is a frequent valvular disease, with an increasing prevalence. We analysed the long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair procedures conducted over the last 10 years in our clinic using almost exclusively two different annuloplasty ring types. Methods A single-centre, retrospective analysis of mitral valve surgeries conducted between January 2005 and December 2015 for patients undergoing first-line mitral valve repair with either open (Cosgrove) or closed (CE Physio / Physio II) annuloplasty (OA or CA, respectively) rings. Results In total, 1120 patient documentations were available of which 528 underwent OA and 592 patients CA. The median age of patients was 64.0 years and 41.1% were female. The majority of these patients underwent the procedure because of degenerative valve disease. Rates of successful repair were about 90%, 72 h procedural mortality was 0.6% and the rate of re-intervention was 0.6% within the first 30 days. Functional (mitral regurgitation, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic diameter and New York Heart Association class) as well as hard outcomes were comparable. 77.7 and 74.4% of patients were alive at the 10-year follow-up in the OA and CA groups, respectively. Upon multivariable adjustment, the hazard ratio was 0.926 (95% CI: 0.642–1.3135; p = 0.681). Conclusions The functional outcome and survival rates up to 10 years after mitral valve repair were comparable using open and closed annuloplasty rings. Whether this means these rings are interchangeable or a carefully selection of the best-for-the-patient devices will be subject of future investigations.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01405-1Mitral valve repairMitral regurgitationAnnuloplastyOpen ringClosed ring
spellingShingle Ayse Cetinkaya
Maryam Waheed
Karin Bramlage
Oliver Johannes Liakopoulos
Mohamed Zeriouh
Stefan Hein
Peter Bramlage
Markus Schönburg
Yeong-Hoon Choi
Manfred Richter
Comparison of flexible, open with semi-rigid, closed annuloplasty-rings for mitral valve repair
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Mitral valve repair
Mitral regurgitation
Annuloplasty
Open ring
Closed ring
title Comparison of flexible, open with semi-rigid, closed annuloplasty-rings for mitral valve repair
title_full Comparison of flexible, open with semi-rigid, closed annuloplasty-rings for mitral valve repair
title_fullStr Comparison of flexible, open with semi-rigid, closed annuloplasty-rings for mitral valve repair
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of flexible, open with semi-rigid, closed annuloplasty-rings for mitral valve repair
title_short Comparison of flexible, open with semi-rigid, closed annuloplasty-rings for mitral valve repair
title_sort comparison of flexible open with semi rigid closed annuloplasty rings for mitral valve repair
topic Mitral valve repair
Mitral regurgitation
Annuloplasty
Open ring
Closed ring
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01405-1
work_keys_str_mv AT aysecetinkaya comparisonofflexibleopenwithsemirigidclosedannuloplastyringsformitralvalverepair
AT maryamwaheed comparisonofflexibleopenwithsemirigidclosedannuloplastyringsformitralvalverepair
AT karinbramlage comparisonofflexibleopenwithsemirigidclosedannuloplastyringsformitralvalverepair
AT oliverjohannesliakopoulos comparisonofflexibleopenwithsemirigidclosedannuloplastyringsformitralvalverepair
AT mohamedzeriouh comparisonofflexibleopenwithsemirigidclosedannuloplastyringsformitralvalverepair
AT stefanhein comparisonofflexibleopenwithsemirigidclosedannuloplastyringsformitralvalverepair
AT peterbramlage comparisonofflexibleopenwithsemirigidclosedannuloplastyringsformitralvalverepair
AT markusschonburg comparisonofflexibleopenwithsemirigidclosedannuloplastyringsformitralvalverepair
AT yeonghoonchoi comparisonofflexibleopenwithsemirigidclosedannuloplastyringsformitralvalverepair
AT manfredrichter comparisonofflexibleopenwithsemirigidclosedannuloplastyringsformitralvalverepair