Diagnostic comparison of vibration-controlled transient elastography and MRI techniques in overweight and obese patients with NAFLD

Abstract Non-invasive imaging techniques have greatly advanced the assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis but are not fully evaluated in overweight patients. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Asako Nogami, Masato Yoneda, Michihiro Iwaki, Takashi Kobayashi, Takaomi Kessoku, Yasushi Honda, Yuji Ogawa, Kento Imajo, Takuma Higurashi, Kunihiro Hosono, Hiroyuki Kirikoshi, Satoru Saito, Atsushi Nakajima
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-12-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25843-6
_version_ 1797977475983081472
author Asako Nogami
Masato Yoneda
Michihiro Iwaki
Takashi Kobayashi
Takaomi Kessoku
Yasushi Honda
Yuji Ogawa
Kento Imajo
Takuma Higurashi
Kunihiro Hosono
Hiroyuki Kirikoshi
Satoru Saito
Atsushi Nakajima
author_facet Asako Nogami
Masato Yoneda
Michihiro Iwaki
Takashi Kobayashi
Takaomi Kessoku
Yasushi Honda
Yuji Ogawa
Kento Imajo
Takuma Higurashi
Kunihiro Hosono
Hiroyuki Kirikoshi
Satoru Saito
Atsushi Nakajima
author_sort Asako Nogami
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Non-invasive imaging techniques have greatly advanced the assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis but are not fully evaluated in overweight patients. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to assess fibrosis and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and MR imaging (MRI)-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) to assess steatosis in overweight and obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We included 163 biopsy-proven patients with NAFLD who underwent VCTE, MRE/MRI-PDFF, and liver biopsy (years 2014–2020) who were classified according to their body mass index (BMI) as normal (BMI < 25 kg/m2, n = 38), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2, n = 68), and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, n = 57). VCTE and MRE detected fibrosis of stages ≥ 2, ≥ 3, and 4 with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.83–0.94 (VCTE) and 0.85–0.95 (MRE) in all groups, without considerable differences. MRI-PDFF detected steatosis of grades ≥ 2 and 3 with high AUROC in all groups (0.81–1.00). CAP’s diagnostic ability (0.63–0.95) was lower than that of MRI-PDFF and decreased with increasing BMI compared to MRI-PDFF. VCTE and MRE similarly accurately assess fibrosis, although MRI-PDFF is more accurate than CAP in detecting steatosis in overweight and obese patients with NAFLD.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:07:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76183c0d33dd4b398e8a4f7676698bf5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:07:32Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-76183c0d33dd4b398e8a4f7676698bf52022-12-25T12:14:38ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-12-0112111010.1038/s41598-022-25843-6Diagnostic comparison of vibration-controlled transient elastography and MRI techniques in overweight and obese patients with NAFLDAsako Nogami0Masato Yoneda1Michihiro Iwaki2Takashi Kobayashi3Takaomi Kessoku4Yasushi Honda5Yuji Ogawa6Kento Imajo7Takuma Higurashi8Kunihiro Hosono9Hiroyuki Kirikoshi10Satoru Saito11Atsushi Nakajima12Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineClinical Laboratory Department, Yokohama City University HospitalDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineAbstract Non-invasive imaging techniques have greatly advanced the assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis but are not fully evaluated in overweight patients. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to assess fibrosis and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and MR imaging (MRI)-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) to assess steatosis in overweight and obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We included 163 biopsy-proven patients with NAFLD who underwent VCTE, MRE/MRI-PDFF, and liver biopsy (years 2014–2020) who were classified according to their body mass index (BMI) as normal (BMI < 25 kg/m2, n = 38), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2, n = 68), and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, n = 57). VCTE and MRE detected fibrosis of stages ≥ 2, ≥ 3, and 4 with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.83–0.94 (VCTE) and 0.85–0.95 (MRE) in all groups, without considerable differences. MRI-PDFF detected steatosis of grades ≥ 2 and 3 with high AUROC in all groups (0.81–1.00). CAP’s diagnostic ability (0.63–0.95) was lower than that of MRI-PDFF and decreased with increasing BMI compared to MRI-PDFF. VCTE and MRE similarly accurately assess fibrosis, although MRI-PDFF is more accurate than CAP in detecting steatosis in overweight and obese patients with NAFLD.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25843-6
spellingShingle Asako Nogami
Masato Yoneda
Michihiro Iwaki
Takashi Kobayashi
Takaomi Kessoku
Yasushi Honda
Yuji Ogawa
Kento Imajo
Takuma Higurashi
Kunihiro Hosono
Hiroyuki Kirikoshi
Satoru Saito
Atsushi Nakajima
Diagnostic comparison of vibration-controlled transient elastography and MRI techniques in overweight and obese patients with NAFLD
Scientific Reports
title Diagnostic comparison of vibration-controlled transient elastography and MRI techniques in overweight and obese patients with NAFLD
title_full Diagnostic comparison of vibration-controlled transient elastography and MRI techniques in overweight and obese patients with NAFLD
title_fullStr Diagnostic comparison of vibration-controlled transient elastography and MRI techniques in overweight and obese patients with NAFLD
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic comparison of vibration-controlled transient elastography and MRI techniques in overweight and obese patients with NAFLD
title_short Diagnostic comparison of vibration-controlled transient elastography and MRI techniques in overweight and obese patients with NAFLD
title_sort diagnostic comparison of vibration controlled transient elastography and mri techniques in overweight and obese patients with nafld
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25843-6
work_keys_str_mv AT asakonogami diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld
AT masatoyoneda diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld
AT michihiroiwaki diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld
AT takashikobayashi diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld
AT takaomikessoku diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld
AT yasushihonda diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld
AT yujiogawa diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld
AT kentoimajo diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld
AT takumahigurashi diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld
AT kunihirohosono diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld
AT hiroyukikirikoshi diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld
AT satorusaito diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld
AT atsushinakajima diagnosticcomparisonofvibrationcontrolledtransientelastographyandmritechniquesinoverweightandobesepatientswithnafld