Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?

The economic reality of modern healthcare provides a timely reminder to clinicians of their duty to provide outstanding and cost-effective care. Although multiple guidelines outline investigation, management and surveillance of colorectal cancer, none advocate a particular delivery method. Nurse-led...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcus Gilmartin, Nicholas Leaver, George Hall, Helena Fawdry, Seung Lee, James Nicholson, Ramya Kalaiselvan, Raj Rajaganeshan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Beryl Institute 2019-04-01
Series:Patient Experience Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol6/iss1/10
_version_ 1798033243908341760
author Marcus Gilmartin
Nicholas Leaver
George Hall
Helena Fawdry
Seung Lee
James Nicholson
Ramya Kalaiselvan
Raj Rajaganeshan
author_facet Marcus Gilmartin
Nicholas Leaver
George Hall
Helena Fawdry
Seung Lee
James Nicholson
Ramya Kalaiselvan
Raj Rajaganeshan
author_sort Marcus Gilmartin
collection DOAJ
description The economic reality of modern healthcare provides a timely reminder to clinicians of their duty to provide outstanding and cost-effective care. Although multiple guidelines outline investigation, management and surveillance of colorectal cancer, none advocate a particular delivery method. Nurse-led telephone follow-up in multiple specialties has demonstrated equivalent clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction when compared to traditional outpatient department follow-up. This paper aims to compare nurse-led telephone and outpatient follow-up, following surgical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC), focusing on patient perceptions. This cross-sectional study distributed adapted patient satisfaction questionnaire (PS-Q 18) to patients undergoing surveillance following CRC resection via either nurse-led telephone clinics (TC) or standard outpatient department appointments (OPD). 161 questionnaires were distributed (100 OPD, 61 TC); the response rate was 70% for the OPD group, and 87% for the TC group (p=0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between patient reported satisfaction or in preference for healthcare delivery system between groups. More patients in the TC group had serum CEA measured than OPD group. This survey demonstrates high patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up. Owing to the financial benefits on both a patient and healthcare provider level, as well as improved screening uptake (CEA) in our study, a role for this innovative specialist nurse-led telephone clinic clearly exists. The benefits of telephone follow-up in terms of health economics, health equity and adherence to screening protocols support its exclusive role in long-term CRC surveillance.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:27:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-763de862b4364332a0e090df999d1bcf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2372-0247
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:27:11Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher The Beryl Institute
record_format Article
series Patient Experience Journal
spelling doaj.art-763de862b4364332a0e090df999d1bcf2022-12-22T04:04:38ZengThe Beryl InstitutePatient Experience Journal2372-02472019-04-01Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?Marcus GilmartinNicholas LeaverGeorge HallHelena FawdrySeung LeeJames NicholsonRamya KalaiselvanRaj RajaganeshanThe economic reality of modern healthcare provides a timely reminder to clinicians of their duty to provide outstanding and cost-effective care. Although multiple guidelines outline investigation, management and surveillance of colorectal cancer, none advocate a particular delivery method. Nurse-led telephone follow-up in multiple specialties has demonstrated equivalent clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction when compared to traditional outpatient department follow-up. This paper aims to compare nurse-led telephone and outpatient follow-up, following surgical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC), focusing on patient perceptions. This cross-sectional study distributed adapted patient satisfaction questionnaire (PS-Q 18) to patients undergoing surveillance following CRC resection via either nurse-led telephone clinics (TC) or standard outpatient department appointments (OPD). 161 questionnaires were distributed (100 OPD, 61 TC); the response rate was 70% for the OPD group, and 87% for the TC group (p=0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between patient reported satisfaction or in preference for healthcare delivery system between groups. More patients in the TC group had serum CEA measured than OPD group. This survey demonstrates high patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up. Owing to the financial benefits on both a patient and healthcare provider level, as well as improved screening uptake (CEA) in our study, a role for this innovative specialist nurse-led telephone clinic clearly exists. The benefits of telephone follow-up in terms of health economics, health equity and adherence to screening protocols support its exclusive role in long-term CRC surveillance.https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol6/iss1/10patient perceptionquality of carenurse-led follow-uptelephone cliniccolorectal cancerhealth equityhealth economicsnational health serviceinnovation
spellingShingle Marcus Gilmartin
Nicholas Leaver
George Hall
Helena Fawdry
Seung Lee
James Nicholson
Ramya Kalaiselvan
Raj Rajaganeshan
Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?
Patient Experience Journal
patient perception
quality of care
nurse-led follow-up
telephone clinic
colorectal cancer
health equity
health economics
national health service
innovation
title Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?
title_full Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?
title_fullStr Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?
title_full_unstemmed Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?
title_short Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?
title_sort patient perception of telephone follow up after resection for colorectal cancer is it time for an alternative to the out patient clinic
topic patient perception
quality of care
nurse-led follow-up
telephone clinic
colorectal cancer
health equity
health economics
national health service
innovation
url https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol6/iss1/10
work_keys_str_mv AT marcusgilmartin patientperceptionoftelephonefollowupafterresectionforcolorectalcancerisittimeforanalternativetotheoutpatientclinic
AT nicholasleaver patientperceptionoftelephonefollowupafterresectionforcolorectalcancerisittimeforanalternativetotheoutpatientclinic
AT georgehall patientperceptionoftelephonefollowupafterresectionforcolorectalcancerisittimeforanalternativetotheoutpatientclinic
AT helenafawdry patientperceptionoftelephonefollowupafterresectionforcolorectalcancerisittimeforanalternativetotheoutpatientclinic
AT seunglee patientperceptionoftelephonefollowupafterresectionforcolorectalcancerisittimeforanalternativetotheoutpatientclinic
AT jamesnicholson patientperceptionoftelephonefollowupafterresectionforcolorectalcancerisittimeforanalternativetotheoutpatientclinic
AT ramyakalaiselvan patientperceptionoftelephonefollowupafterresectionforcolorectalcancerisittimeforanalternativetotheoutpatientclinic
AT rajrajaganeshan patientperceptionoftelephonefollowupafterresectionforcolorectalcancerisittimeforanalternativetotheoutpatientclinic