Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs

Objectives:. The objective of this study was to determine the validity and inter-rater reliability of radiographic assessment of sagittal deformity of femoral neck fractures. Design:. This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting:. Level 1 trauma center. Patients/Participants:. Thirty-one patients 6...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madeline S. Tiee, MD, MS, Andrew G. Golz, MD, Andrew Kim, BA, Joseph B. Cohen, MD, Hobie D. Summers, MD, Anup J. Alexander, MD, William D. Lack, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2023-06-01
Series:OTA International
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000273
_version_ 1797671814966542336
author Madeline S. Tiee, MD, MS
Andrew G. Golz, MD
Andrew Kim, BA
Joseph B. Cohen, MD
Hobie D. Summers, MD
Anup J. Alexander, MD
William D. Lack, MD
author_facet Madeline S. Tiee, MD, MS
Andrew G. Golz, MD
Andrew Kim, BA
Joseph B. Cohen, MD
Hobie D. Summers, MD
Anup J. Alexander, MD
William D. Lack, MD
author_sort Madeline S. Tiee, MD, MS
collection DOAJ
description Objectives:. The objective of this study was to determine the validity and inter-rater reliability of radiographic assessment of sagittal deformity of femoral neck fractures. Design:. This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting:. Level 1 trauma center. Patients/Participants:. Thirty-one patients 65 years or older who sustained low-energy, Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures imaged with biplanar radiographs and either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were included. Main Outcome Measurements:. Preoperative sagittal tilt was measured on lateral radiographs and compared with the tilt identified on advanced imaging. Fractures were defined as “high-risk” if posterior tilt was ≥20 degrees or anterior tilt was >10 degrees. Results:. Of 31 Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures, advanced imaging identified 10 high-risk fractures including 8 (25.8%) with posterior tilt ≥20 degrees and 2 (6.5%) with anterior tilt >10 degrees. Overall, there was no significant difference between sagittal tilt measured using lateral radiographs and advanced imaging (P = 0.84), and the 3 raters had good agreement between their measurements of sagittal tilt on lateral radiographs (interclass correlation coefficient 0.79, 95% confidence interval [0.65, 0.88], P < 0.01). However, for high-risk fractures, radiographic measurements from lateral radiographs alone resulted in greater variability and underestimation of tilt by 5.2 degrees (95% confidence interval [−18.68, 8.28]) when compared with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Owing to this underestimation of sagittal tilt, the raters misclassified high-risk fractures as “low-risk” in most cases (averaging 6.3 of 10, 63%, range 6 − 7) when using lateral radiographs while low-risk fractures were rarely misclassified as high-risk (averaging 1.7 of 21, 7.9%, range 1 − 3, P = 0.01). Conclusions:. Lateral radiographs frequently lead surgeons to misclassify high-risk sagittal tilt of low-energy femoral neck fractures as low-risk. Further research is necessary to improve the assessment of sagittal plane deformity for these injuries. Level of Evidence:. Level IV diagnostic study.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:20:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7651369b4b294cef99cd1ad1a1dd1c5a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2574-2167
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T21:20:58Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series OTA International
spelling doaj.art-7651369b4b294cef99cd1ad1a1dd1c5a2023-09-28T07:17:33ZengWolters KluwerOTA International2574-21672023-06-016210.1097/OI9.0000000000000273OI90000000000000273Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographsMadeline S. Tiee, MD, MS0Andrew G. Golz, MD1Andrew Kim, BA2Joseph B. Cohen, MD3Hobie D. Summers, MD4Anup J. Alexander, MD5William D. Lack, MD6a Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, ILa Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, ILc Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, ILa Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, ILa Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, ILd Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; ande Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Objectives:. The objective of this study was to determine the validity and inter-rater reliability of radiographic assessment of sagittal deformity of femoral neck fractures. Design:. This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting:. Level 1 trauma center. Patients/Participants:. Thirty-one patients 65 years or older who sustained low-energy, Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures imaged with biplanar radiographs and either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were included. Main Outcome Measurements:. Preoperative sagittal tilt was measured on lateral radiographs and compared with the tilt identified on advanced imaging. Fractures were defined as “high-risk” if posterior tilt was ≥20 degrees or anterior tilt was >10 degrees. Results:. Of 31 Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures, advanced imaging identified 10 high-risk fractures including 8 (25.8%) with posterior tilt ≥20 degrees and 2 (6.5%) with anterior tilt >10 degrees. Overall, there was no significant difference between sagittal tilt measured using lateral radiographs and advanced imaging (P = 0.84), and the 3 raters had good agreement between their measurements of sagittal tilt on lateral radiographs (interclass correlation coefficient 0.79, 95% confidence interval [0.65, 0.88], P < 0.01). However, for high-risk fractures, radiographic measurements from lateral radiographs alone resulted in greater variability and underestimation of tilt by 5.2 degrees (95% confidence interval [−18.68, 8.28]) when compared with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Owing to this underestimation of sagittal tilt, the raters misclassified high-risk fractures as “low-risk” in most cases (averaging 6.3 of 10, 63%, range 6 − 7) when using lateral radiographs while low-risk fractures were rarely misclassified as high-risk (averaging 1.7 of 21, 7.9%, range 1 − 3, P = 0.01). Conclusions:. Lateral radiographs frequently lead surgeons to misclassify high-risk sagittal tilt of low-energy femoral neck fractures as low-risk. Further research is necessary to improve the assessment of sagittal plane deformity for these injuries. Level of Evidence:. Level IV diagnostic study.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000273
spellingShingle Madeline S. Tiee, MD, MS
Andrew G. Golz, MD
Andrew Kim, BA
Joseph B. Cohen, MD
Hobie D. Summers, MD
Anup J. Alexander, MD
William D. Lack, MD
Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs
OTA International
title Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs
title_full Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs
title_fullStr Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs
title_full_unstemmed Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs
title_short Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs
title_sort sagittal deformity of garden type i and ii geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000273
work_keys_str_mv AT madelinestieemdms sagittaldeformityofgardentypeiandiigeriatricfemoralneckfracturesisfrequentlymisclassifiedbylateralradiographs
AT andrewggolzmd sagittaldeformityofgardentypeiandiigeriatricfemoralneckfracturesisfrequentlymisclassifiedbylateralradiographs
AT andrewkimba sagittaldeformityofgardentypeiandiigeriatricfemoralneckfracturesisfrequentlymisclassifiedbylateralradiographs
AT josephbcohenmd sagittaldeformityofgardentypeiandiigeriatricfemoralneckfracturesisfrequentlymisclassifiedbylateralradiographs
AT hobiedsummersmd sagittaldeformityofgardentypeiandiigeriatricfemoralneckfracturesisfrequentlymisclassifiedbylateralradiographs
AT anupjalexandermd sagittaldeformityofgardentypeiandiigeriatricfemoralneckfracturesisfrequentlymisclassifiedbylateralradiographs
AT williamdlackmd sagittaldeformityofgardentypeiandiigeriatricfemoralneckfracturesisfrequentlymisclassifiedbylateralradiographs