Clinical feasibility of CS-VIBE accelerates MRI techniques in diagnosing intracranial metastasis
Abstract Our objective was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of post-contrast 3D compressed-sensing volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (CS-VIBE) and 3D T1 magnetization-prepared rapid-acquisition gradient-echo (MPRAGE) in detecting intracranial metastasis. Additionally, we...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37148-3 |
| _version_ | 1797795716326752256 |
|---|---|
| author | Sang Ik Park Younghee Yim Mi Sun Chung |
| author_facet | Sang Ik Park Younghee Yim Mi Sun Chung |
| author_sort | Sang Ik Park |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Our objective was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of post-contrast 3D compressed-sensing volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (CS-VIBE) and 3D T1 magnetization-prepared rapid-acquisition gradient-echo (MPRAGE) in detecting intracranial metastasis. Additionally, we analyzed and compared the image quality between the two. We enrolled 164 cancer patients who underwent contrast-enhanced brain MRI. Two neuroradiologists independently reviewed all the images. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to noise ratio (CNR) were compared between two sequences. For patients with intracranial metastasis, we measured enhancement degree and CNRlesion/parenchyma of the lesion. The overall image quality, motion artifact, gray-white matter discrimination and enhancing lesion conspicuity were analyzed. Both MPRAGE and CS-VIBE showed similar performance in diagnosing intracranial metastasis. Overall image quality of CS-VIBE was better with less motion artifact; however conventional MPRAGE was superior in enhancing lesion conspicuity. Overall, the SNR and CNR of conventional MPRAGE were higher than those of CS-VIBE. For 30 enhancing intracranial metastatic lesions, MPRAGE showed a lower CNR (p = 0.02) and contrast ratio (p = 0.03). MPRAGE and CS-VIBE were preferred in 11.6 and 13.4% of cases, respectively. In comparison with conventional MPRAGE, CS-VIBE achieved comparable image quality and visualization, with the scan time being half of that of MPRAGE. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T03:22:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-76522ba18a544e92801cd1f94f722b70 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2045-2322 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T03:22:14Z |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Reports |
| spelling | doaj.art-76522ba18a544e92801cd1f94f722b702023-06-25T11:15:38ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-06-0113111010.1038/s41598-023-37148-3Clinical feasibility of CS-VIBE accelerates MRI techniques in diagnosing intracranial metastasisSang Ik Park0Younghee Yim1Mi Sun Chung2Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of MedicineDepartment of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of MedicineDepartment of Radiology, Human Medical Imaging and Intervention CenterAbstract Our objective was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of post-contrast 3D compressed-sensing volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (CS-VIBE) and 3D T1 magnetization-prepared rapid-acquisition gradient-echo (MPRAGE) in detecting intracranial metastasis. Additionally, we analyzed and compared the image quality between the two. We enrolled 164 cancer patients who underwent contrast-enhanced brain MRI. Two neuroradiologists independently reviewed all the images. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to noise ratio (CNR) were compared between two sequences. For patients with intracranial metastasis, we measured enhancement degree and CNRlesion/parenchyma of the lesion. The overall image quality, motion artifact, gray-white matter discrimination and enhancing lesion conspicuity were analyzed. Both MPRAGE and CS-VIBE showed similar performance in diagnosing intracranial metastasis. Overall image quality of CS-VIBE was better with less motion artifact; however conventional MPRAGE was superior in enhancing lesion conspicuity. Overall, the SNR and CNR of conventional MPRAGE were higher than those of CS-VIBE. For 30 enhancing intracranial metastatic lesions, MPRAGE showed a lower CNR (p = 0.02) and contrast ratio (p = 0.03). MPRAGE and CS-VIBE were preferred in 11.6 and 13.4% of cases, respectively. In comparison with conventional MPRAGE, CS-VIBE achieved comparable image quality and visualization, with the scan time being half of that of MPRAGE.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37148-3 |
| spellingShingle | Sang Ik Park Younghee Yim Mi Sun Chung Clinical feasibility of CS-VIBE accelerates MRI techniques in diagnosing intracranial metastasis Scientific Reports |
| title | Clinical feasibility of CS-VIBE accelerates MRI techniques in diagnosing intracranial metastasis |
| title_full | Clinical feasibility of CS-VIBE accelerates MRI techniques in diagnosing intracranial metastasis |
| title_fullStr | Clinical feasibility of CS-VIBE accelerates MRI techniques in diagnosing intracranial metastasis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Clinical feasibility of CS-VIBE accelerates MRI techniques in diagnosing intracranial metastasis |
| title_short | Clinical feasibility of CS-VIBE accelerates MRI techniques in diagnosing intracranial metastasis |
| title_sort | clinical feasibility of cs vibe accelerates mri techniques in diagnosing intracranial metastasis |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37148-3 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sangikpark clinicalfeasibilityofcsvibeacceleratesmritechniquesindiagnosingintracranialmetastasis AT youngheeyim clinicalfeasibilityofcsvibeacceleratesmritechniquesindiagnosingintracranialmetastasis AT misunchung clinicalfeasibilityofcsvibeacceleratesmritechniquesindiagnosingintracranialmetastasis |