To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands
Feeding wild animals is a regular habit in ecotourism worldwide with poorly known consequences for ecosystem functioning. This study investigates how effective bread feeding is at attracting coral reef fish in the South Pacific, which feeding groups of fish are most attracted, and how natural foragi...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Marine Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00145/full |
_version_ | 1811216523982798848 |
---|---|
author | Natalie Prinz Natalie Prinz Richard Story Stephen Lyon Sebastian C. A. Ferse Sebastian C. A. Ferse Sonia Bejarano |
author_facet | Natalie Prinz Natalie Prinz Richard Story Stephen Lyon Sebastian C. A. Ferse Sebastian C. A. Ferse Sonia Bejarano |
author_sort | Natalie Prinz |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Feeding wild animals is a regular habit in ecotourism worldwide with poorly known consequences for ecosystem functioning. This study investigates how effective bread feeding is at attracting coral reef fish in the South Pacific, which feeding groups of fish are most attracted, and how natural foraging rates of an omnivorous and a grazing-detritivorous fish are affected. Data were collected at sites where fish are regularly fed bread by snorkellers and at comparison sites where bread was only provided for this study, within the Aitutaki lagoon (Cook Islands). The fish community was censused and foraging rates of two model species (Chaetodon auriga, Ctenochaetus striatus) were quantified one hour before, during, and an hour after feeding events. Twenty-five percent of the species present at all sites (piscivores-invertivores) were effectively attracted to bread. Overall, mean fish density was higher at tourism feeding sites than at the comparison sites. During bread feeding events, taxonomic richness decreased, compared to the hours prior and after feeding across all sites. As piscivore-invertivores were consistently attracted to bread, localized shifts in their dominance over other trophic groups may be expected if bread feeding persists, likely carrying consequences for ecosystem functioning. The effect of bread feeding events on natural foraging rates differed between the model species. C. auriga ceased foraging on natural foods to feed on bread. Although C. striatus never fed on bread, its foraging rate on epilithic algal matrices decreased during bread feeding events. This indirect non-lethal ecological consequence of bread feeding contributes a previously unanticipated example relevant to the “ecology of fear” in marine fish. Stakeholder interviews revealed that locals favor feeding to sustain tourist satisfaction, whereas tourists appreciate snorkeling regardless of feeding. This indicates an opportunity for restrictions on fish feeding with minimal drawbacks for tourism. Future research on fish metabolism and cascading effects on the reef benthos may reveal further impacts of feeding on coral reef communities. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T06:40:32Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7656a9841b214dd8993920b7b1a67ca9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2296-7745 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T06:40:32Z |
publishDate | 2020-03-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Marine Science |
spelling | doaj.art-7656a9841b214dd8993920b7b1a67ca92022-12-22T03:43:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452020-03-01710.3389/fmars.2020.00145514166To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook IslandsNatalie Prinz0Natalie Prinz1Richard Story2Stephen Lyon3Sebastian C. A. Ferse4Sebastian C. A. Ferse5Sonia Bejarano6Department of Biology and Chemistry (FB2), Universität Bremen, Bremen, GermanyLeibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research, Bremen, GermanyMinistry of Marine Resources, Rarotonga, Cook IslandsPacific Island Conservation Initiative, Rarotonga, Cook IslandsDepartment of Biology and Chemistry (FB2), Universität Bremen, Bremen, GermanyLeibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research, Bremen, GermanyReef Systems Research Group, Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, GermanyFeeding wild animals is a regular habit in ecotourism worldwide with poorly known consequences for ecosystem functioning. This study investigates how effective bread feeding is at attracting coral reef fish in the South Pacific, which feeding groups of fish are most attracted, and how natural foraging rates of an omnivorous and a grazing-detritivorous fish are affected. Data were collected at sites where fish are regularly fed bread by snorkellers and at comparison sites where bread was only provided for this study, within the Aitutaki lagoon (Cook Islands). The fish community was censused and foraging rates of two model species (Chaetodon auriga, Ctenochaetus striatus) were quantified one hour before, during, and an hour after feeding events. Twenty-five percent of the species present at all sites (piscivores-invertivores) were effectively attracted to bread. Overall, mean fish density was higher at tourism feeding sites than at the comparison sites. During bread feeding events, taxonomic richness decreased, compared to the hours prior and after feeding across all sites. As piscivore-invertivores were consistently attracted to bread, localized shifts in their dominance over other trophic groups may be expected if bread feeding persists, likely carrying consequences for ecosystem functioning. The effect of bread feeding events on natural foraging rates differed between the model species. C. auriga ceased foraging on natural foods to feed on bread. Although C. striatus never fed on bread, its foraging rate on epilithic algal matrices decreased during bread feeding events. This indirect non-lethal ecological consequence of bread feeding contributes a previously unanticipated example relevant to the “ecology of fear” in marine fish. Stakeholder interviews revealed that locals favor feeding to sustain tourist satisfaction, whereas tourists appreciate snorkeling regardless of feeding. This indicates an opportunity for restrictions on fish feeding with minimal drawbacks for tourism. Future research on fish metabolism and cascading effects on the reef benthos may reveal further impacts of feeding on coral reef communities.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00145/fullcoral reeftourismecosystem functionforaging ratesprovisioningsupplementary feeding |
spellingShingle | Natalie Prinz Natalie Prinz Richard Story Stephen Lyon Sebastian C. A. Ferse Sebastian C. A. Ferse Sonia Bejarano To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands Frontiers in Marine Science coral reef tourism ecosystem function foraging rates provisioning supplementary feeding |
title | To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands |
title_full | To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands |
title_fullStr | To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands |
title_full_unstemmed | To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands |
title_short | To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands |
title_sort | to feed or not to feed coral reef fish responses to artificial feeding and stakeholder perceptions in the aitutaki lagoon cook islands |
topic | coral reef tourism ecosystem function foraging rates provisioning supplementary feeding |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00145/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT natalieprinz tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands AT natalieprinz tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands AT richardstory tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands AT stephenlyon tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands AT sebastiancaferse tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands AT sebastiancaferse tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands AT soniabejarano tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands |