To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands

Feeding wild animals is a regular habit in ecotourism worldwide with poorly known consequences for ecosystem functioning. This study investigates how effective bread feeding is at attracting coral reef fish in the South Pacific, which feeding groups of fish are most attracted, and how natural foragi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalie Prinz, Richard Story, Stephen Lyon, Sebastian C. A. Ferse, Sonia Bejarano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00145/full
_version_ 1811216523982798848
author Natalie Prinz
Natalie Prinz
Richard Story
Stephen Lyon
Sebastian C. A. Ferse
Sebastian C. A. Ferse
Sonia Bejarano
author_facet Natalie Prinz
Natalie Prinz
Richard Story
Stephen Lyon
Sebastian C. A. Ferse
Sebastian C. A. Ferse
Sonia Bejarano
author_sort Natalie Prinz
collection DOAJ
description Feeding wild animals is a regular habit in ecotourism worldwide with poorly known consequences for ecosystem functioning. This study investigates how effective bread feeding is at attracting coral reef fish in the South Pacific, which feeding groups of fish are most attracted, and how natural foraging rates of an omnivorous and a grazing-detritivorous fish are affected. Data were collected at sites where fish are regularly fed bread by snorkellers and at comparison sites where bread was only provided for this study, within the Aitutaki lagoon (Cook Islands). The fish community was censused and foraging rates of two model species (Chaetodon auriga, Ctenochaetus striatus) were quantified one hour before, during, and an hour after feeding events. Twenty-five percent of the species present at all sites (piscivores-invertivores) were effectively attracted to bread. Overall, mean fish density was higher at tourism feeding sites than at the comparison sites. During bread feeding events, taxonomic richness decreased, compared to the hours prior and after feeding across all sites. As piscivore-invertivores were consistently attracted to bread, localized shifts in their dominance over other trophic groups may be expected if bread feeding persists, likely carrying consequences for ecosystem functioning. The effect of bread feeding events on natural foraging rates differed between the model species. C. auriga ceased foraging on natural foods to feed on bread. Although C. striatus never fed on bread, its foraging rate on epilithic algal matrices decreased during bread feeding events. This indirect non-lethal ecological consequence of bread feeding contributes a previously unanticipated example relevant to the “ecology of fear” in marine fish. Stakeholder interviews revealed that locals favor feeding to sustain tourist satisfaction, whereas tourists appreciate snorkeling regardless of feeding. This indicates an opportunity for restrictions on fish feeding with minimal drawbacks for tourism. Future research on fish metabolism and cascading effects on the reef benthos may reveal further impacts of feeding on coral reef communities.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T06:40:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7656a9841b214dd8993920b7b1a67ca9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-7745
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T06:40:32Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj.art-7656a9841b214dd8993920b7b1a67ca92022-12-22T03:43:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452020-03-01710.3389/fmars.2020.00145514166To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook IslandsNatalie Prinz0Natalie Prinz1Richard Story2Stephen Lyon3Sebastian C. A. Ferse4Sebastian C. A. Ferse5Sonia Bejarano6Department of Biology and Chemistry (FB2), Universität Bremen, Bremen, GermanyLeibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research, Bremen, GermanyMinistry of Marine Resources, Rarotonga, Cook IslandsPacific Island Conservation Initiative, Rarotonga, Cook IslandsDepartment of Biology and Chemistry (FB2), Universität Bremen, Bremen, GermanyLeibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research, Bremen, GermanyReef Systems Research Group, Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, GermanyFeeding wild animals is a regular habit in ecotourism worldwide with poorly known consequences for ecosystem functioning. This study investigates how effective bread feeding is at attracting coral reef fish in the South Pacific, which feeding groups of fish are most attracted, and how natural foraging rates of an omnivorous and a grazing-detritivorous fish are affected. Data were collected at sites where fish are regularly fed bread by snorkellers and at comparison sites where bread was only provided for this study, within the Aitutaki lagoon (Cook Islands). The fish community was censused and foraging rates of two model species (Chaetodon auriga, Ctenochaetus striatus) were quantified one hour before, during, and an hour after feeding events. Twenty-five percent of the species present at all sites (piscivores-invertivores) were effectively attracted to bread. Overall, mean fish density was higher at tourism feeding sites than at the comparison sites. During bread feeding events, taxonomic richness decreased, compared to the hours prior and after feeding across all sites. As piscivore-invertivores were consistently attracted to bread, localized shifts in their dominance over other trophic groups may be expected if bread feeding persists, likely carrying consequences for ecosystem functioning. The effect of bread feeding events on natural foraging rates differed between the model species. C. auriga ceased foraging on natural foods to feed on bread. Although C. striatus never fed on bread, its foraging rate on epilithic algal matrices decreased during bread feeding events. This indirect non-lethal ecological consequence of bread feeding contributes a previously unanticipated example relevant to the “ecology of fear” in marine fish. Stakeholder interviews revealed that locals favor feeding to sustain tourist satisfaction, whereas tourists appreciate snorkeling regardless of feeding. This indicates an opportunity for restrictions on fish feeding with minimal drawbacks for tourism. Future research on fish metabolism and cascading effects on the reef benthos may reveal further impacts of feeding on coral reef communities.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00145/fullcoral reeftourismecosystem functionforaging ratesprovisioningsupplementary feeding
spellingShingle Natalie Prinz
Natalie Prinz
Richard Story
Stephen Lyon
Sebastian C. A. Ferse
Sebastian C. A. Ferse
Sonia Bejarano
To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands
Frontiers in Marine Science
coral reef
tourism
ecosystem function
foraging rates
provisioning
supplementary feeding
title To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands
title_full To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands
title_fullStr To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands
title_full_unstemmed To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands
title_short To Feed or Not to Feed? Coral Reef Fish Responses to Artificial Feeding and Stakeholder Perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands
title_sort to feed or not to feed coral reef fish responses to artificial feeding and stakeholder perceptions in the aitutaki lagoon cook islands
topic coral reef
tourism
ecosystem function
foraging rates
provisioning
supplementary feeding
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00145/full
work_keys_str_mv AT natalieprinz tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands
AT natalieprinz tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands
AT richardstory tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands
AT stephenlyon tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands
AT sebastiancaferse tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands
AT sebastiancaferse tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands
AT soniabejarano tofeedornottofeedcoralreeffishresponsestoartificialfeedingandstakeholderperceptionsintheaitutakilagooncookislands