Reducing low-value care: what can we learn from eight de-implementation studies in the Netherlands?

Background Reducing the overuse of care that is proven to be of low value increases the quality and safety of care. We aimed to identify lessons for reducing low-value care by looking at: (1) The effects of eight de-implementation projects. (2) The barriers and facilitators that emerged. (3) The exp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lotty Hooft, Pauline Heus, Gert P Westert, Rudolf B Kool, Suzanne E Geerlings, Janwillem Kocks, Prabath W B Nanayakkara, Tessa Rietbergen, Leti van Bodegom-Vos, Simone A van Dulmen, Eva W Verkerk, Corina de Jong, Bart J Laan, JOOST P H DRENTH, Marlies Wakkee, Aniek de Coninck, Harry C Schouten, Evelien I T de Schepper, Saskia F van Vugt, Renuka S Bindraban, Sven van Egmond, Judith J de Jong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-01
Series:BMJ Open Quality
Online Access:https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/11/3/e001710.full
_version_ 1811274639384510464
author Lotty Hooft
Pauline Heus
Gert P Westert
Rudolf B Kool
Suzanne E Geerlings
Janwillem Kocks
Prabath W B Nanayakkara
Tessa Rietbergen
Leti van Bodegom-Vos
Simone A van Dulmen
Eva W Verkerk
Corina de Jong
Bart J Laan
JOOST P H DRENTH
Marlies Wakkee
Aniek de Coninck
Harry C Schouten
Evelien I T de Schepper
Saskia F van Vugt
Renuka S Bindraban
Sven van Egmond
Judith J de Jong
author_facet Lotty Hooft
Pauline Heus
Gert P Westert
Rudolf B Kool
Suzanne E Geerlings
Janwillem Kocks
Prabath W B Nanayakkara
Tessa Rietbergen
Leti van Bodegom-Vos
Simone A van Dulmen
Eva W Verkerk
Corina de Jong
Bart J Laan
JOOST P H DRENTH
Marlies Wakkee
Aniek de Coninck
Harry C Schouten
Evelien I T de Schepper
Saskia F van Vugt
Renuka S Bindraban
Sven van Egmond
Judith J de Jong
collection DOAJ
description Background Reducing the overuse of care that is proven to be of low value increases the quality and safety of care. We aimed to identify lessons for reducing low-value care by looking at: (1) The effects of eight de-implementation projects. (2) The barriers and facilitators that emerged. (3) The experiences with the different components of the projects.Methods We performed a process evaluation of eight multicentre projects aimed at reducing low-value care. We reported the quantitative outcomes of the eight projects on the volume of low-value care and performed a qualitative analysis of the project teams’ experiences and evaluations. A total of 40 hospitals and 198 general practitioners participated.Results Five out of eight projects resulted in a reduction of low-value care, ranging from 11.4% to 61.3%. The remaining three projects showed no effect. Six projects monitored balancing measures and observed no negative consequences of their strategy. The most important barriers were a lack of time, an inability to reassure the patient, a desire to meet the patient’s wishes, financial considerations and a discomfort with uncertainty. The most important facilitators were support among clinicians, knowledge of the harms of low-value care and a growing consciousness that more is not always better. Repeated education and feedback for clinicians, patient information material and organisational changes were valued components of the strategy.Conclusions Successfully reducing low-value care is possible in spite of the powerful barriers that oppose it. The projects managed to recruit many hospitals and general practices, with five of them achieving significant results without measuring negative consequences. Based on our findings, we offer practical recommendations for successfully reducing low-value care.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:22:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-765a305c91e64bc9b65399547acc336e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2399-6641
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:22:48Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open Quality
spelling doaj.art-765a305c91e64bc9b65399547acc336e2022-12-22T03:12:29ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Quality2399-66412022-09-0111310.1136/bmjoq-2021-001710Reducing low-value care: what can we learn from eight de-implementation studies in the Netherlands? Lotty Hooft0Pauline Heus1Gert P Westert2Rudolf B Kool3Suzanne E GeerlingsJanwillem KocksPrabath W B NanayakkaraTessa RietbergenLeti van Bodegom-VosSimone A van Dulmen4Eva W Verkerk5Corina de JongBart J LaanJOOST P H DRENTHMarlies WakkeeAniek de ConinckHarry C SchoutenEvelien I T de SchepperSaskia F van VugtRenuka S BindrabanSven van EgmondJudith J de JongCochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsCochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsDepartment of IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsDepartment of IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsDepartment of IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsBackground Reducing the overuse of care that is proven to be of low value increases the quality and safety of care. We aimed to identify lessons for reducing low-value care by looking at: (1) The effects of eight de-implementation projects. (2) The barriers and facilitators that emerged. (3) The experiences with the different components of the projects.Methods We performed a process evaluation of eight multicentre projects aimed at reducing low-value care. We reported the quantitative outcomes of the eight projects on the volume of low-value care and performed a qualitative analysis of the project teams’ experiences and evaluations. A total of 40 hospitals and 198 general practitioners participated.Results Five out of eight projects resulted in a reduction of low-value care, ranging from 11.4% to 61.3%. The remaining three projects showed no effect. Six projects monitored balancing measures and observed no negative consequences of their strategy. The most important barriers were a lack of time, an inability to reassure the patient, a desire to meet the patient’s wishes, financial considerations and a discomfort with uncertainty. The most important facilitators were support among clinicians, knowledge of the harms of low-value care and a growing consciousness that more is not always better. Repeated education and feedback for clinicians, patient information material and organisational changes were valued components of the strategy.Conclusions Successfully reducing low-value care is possible in spite of the powerful barriers that oppose it. The projects managed to recruit many hospitals and general practices, with five of them achieving significant results without measuring negative consequences. Based on our findings, we offer practical recommendations for successfully reducing low-value care.https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/11/3/e001710.full
spellingShingle Lotty Hooft
Pauline Heus
Gert P Westert
Rudolf B Kool
Suzanne E Geerlings
Janwillem Kocks
Prabath W B Nanayakkara
Tessa Rietbergen
Leti van Bodegom-Vos
Simone A van Dulmen
Eva W Verkerk
Corina de Jong
Bart J Laan
JOOST P H DRENTH
Marlies Wakkee
Aniek de Coninck
Harry C Schouten
Evelien I T de Schepper
Saskia F van Vugt
Renuka S Bindraban
Sven van Egmond
Judith J de Jong
Reducing low-value care: what can we learn from eight de-implementation studies in the Netherlands?
BMJ Open Quality
title Reducing low-value care: what can we learn from eight de-implementation studies in the Netherlands?
title_full Reducing low-value care: what can we learn from eight de-implementation studies in the Netherlands?
title_fullStr Reducing low-value care: what can we learn from eight de-implementation studies in the Netherlands?
title_full_unstemmed Reducing low-value care: what can we learn from eight de-implementation studies in the Netherlands?
title_short Reducing low-value care: what can we learn from eight de-implementation studies in the Netherlands?
title_sort reducing low value care what can we learn from eight de implementation studies in the netherlands
url https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/11/3/e001710.full
work_keys_str_mv AT reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT lottyhooft reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT paulineheus reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT gertpwestert reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT rudolfbkool reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT suzanneegeerlings reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT janwillemkocks reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT prabathwbnanayakkara reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT tessarietbergen reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT letivanbodegomvos reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT simoneavandulmen reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT evawverkerk reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT corinadejong reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT bartjlaan reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT joostphdrenth reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT marlieswakkee reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT aniekdeconinck reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT harrycschouten reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT evelienitdeschepper reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT saskiafvanvugt reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT renukasbindraban reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT svenvanegmond reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands
AT judithjdejong reducinglowvaluecarewhatcanwelearnfromeightdeimplementationstudiesinthenetherlands