Fatal esophageal–pericardial fistula as a complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation

The clinical role of catheter ablation using radiofrequency or cryothermal energy has become an important therapy in the management of patients with recurrent or persistent tachyarrhythmia that is refractory to medical therapy. It is regarded as a safe and reliable procedure and is performed routine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Zakaria, Kellen Hipp, Nicholas Battista, Emily Tommolino, Christian Machado
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-04-01
Series:SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X19841150
_version_ 1818922825189163008
author Ali Zakaria
Kellen Hipp
Nicholas Battista
Emily Tommolino
Christian Machado
author_facet Ali Zakaria
Kellen Hipp
Nicholas Battista
Emily Tommolino
Christian Machado
author_sort Ali Zakaria
collection DOAJ
description The clinical role of catheter ablation using radiofrequency or cryothermal energy has become an important therapy in the management of patients with recurrent or persistent tachyarrhythmia that is refractory to medical therapy. It is regarded as a safe and reliable procedure and is performed routinely in health care facilities across the country. Like all procedures, there are associated risks and benefits. Development of an esophageal–atrial fistula is a rare but often-fatal complication of radiofrequency ablation. It is the second most frequent cause of death caused by the procedure, with mortality rates in excess of 70%. Death usually occurs as a result of cerebral or myocardial air embolism, endocarditis, massive gastrointestinal bleeding, and/or septic shock. Electrophysiologists have instituted a number of safeguard techniques to diminish the risk of developing esophageal–atrial fistula. Despite these measurements, instances of fistulous development still occur. Herein, we report a case of a 74-year-old male who presented with chest pain secondary to esophageal–pericardial fistula 19 days after pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency energy for atrial fibrillation in order to illustrate the clinical variability and diagnostic challenges associated with this dreaded gastrointestinal complication.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T01:59:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76615e6bbb2942fbb988b365f26daf99
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-313X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T01:59:41Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
spelling doaj.art-76615e6bbb2942fbb988b365f26daf992022-12-21T19:57:22ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medical Case Reports2050-313X2019-04-01710.1177/2050313X19841150Fatal esophageal–pericardial fistula as a complication of radiofrequency catheter ablationAli Zakaria0Kellen Hipp1Nicholas Battista2Emily Tommolino3Christian Machado4Division of Gastroenterology, Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Southfield, MI, USADepartment of Internal Medicine, Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Southfield, MI, USADivision of Gastroenterology, Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Southfield, MI, USADivision of Gastroenterology, Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Southfield, MI, USADivision of Cardiology, Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Southfield, MI, USAThe clinical role of catheter ablation using radiofrequency or cryothermal energy has become an important therapy in the management of patients with recurrent or persistent tachyarrhythmia that is refractory to medical therapy. It is regarded as a safe and reliable procedure and is performed routinely in health care facilities across the country. Like all procedures, there are associated risks and benefits. Development of an esophageal–atrial fistula is a rare but often-fatal complication of radiofrequency ablation. It is the second most frequent cause of death caused by the procedure, with mortality rates in excess of 70%. Death usually occurs as a result of cerebral or myocardial air embolism, endocarditis, massive gastrointestinal bleeding, and/or septic shock. Electrophysiologists have instituted a number of safeguard techniques to diminish the risk of developing esophageal–atrial fistula. Despite these measurements, instances of fistulous development still occur. Herein, we report a case of a 74-year-old male who presented with chest pain secondary to esophageal–pericardial fistula 19 days after pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency energy for atrial fibrillation in order to illustrate the clinical variability and diagnostic challenges associated with this dreaded gastrointestinal complication.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X19841150
spellingShingle Ali Zakaria
Kellen Hipp
Nicholas Battista
Emily Tommolino
Christian Machado
Fatal esophageal–pericardial fistula as a complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation
SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
title Fatal esophageal–pericardial fistula as a complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation
title_full Fatal esophageal–pericardial fistula as a complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation
title_fullStr Fatal esophageal–pericardial fistula as a complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation
title_full_unstemmed Fatal esophageal–pericardial fistula as a complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation
title_short Fatal esophageal–pericardial fistula as a complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation
title_sort fatal esophageal pericardial fistula as a complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X19841150
work_keys_str_mv AT alizakaria fatalesophagealpericardialfistulaasacomplicationofradiofrequencycatheterablation
AT kellenhipp fatalesophagealpericardialfistulaasacomplicationofradiofrequencycatheterablation
AT nicholasbattista fatalesophagealpericardialfistulaasacomplicationofradiofrequencycatheterablation
AT emilytommolino fatalesophagealpericardialfistulaasacomplicationofradiofrequencycatheterablation
AT christianmachado fatalesophagealpericardialfistulaasacomplicationofradiofrequencycatheterablation