A randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn

Abstract Background Caesarean delivery (CD) increases the risk of postpartum infection by 5 to 20 fold. Prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) is the goal of antibiotic prophylaxis. This study was carried out to assess the optimum timing for prophylactic antibiotic administration and to assess...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chinta Annie Jyothirmayi, Ajay Halder, Bijesh Yadav, Santosh Thomas Samuel, Anil Kuruvilla, Ruby Jose
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-10-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-017-1526-y
_version_ 1818134326108225536
author Chinta Annie Jyothirmayi
Ajay Halder
Bijesh Yadav
Santosh Thomas Samuel
Anil Kuruvilla
Ruby Jose
author_facet Chinta Annie Jyothirmayi
Ajay Halder
Bijesh Yadav
Santosh Thomas Samuel
Anil Kuruvilla
Ruby Jose
author_sort Chinta Annie Jyothirmayi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Caesarean delivery (CD) increases the risk of postpartum infection by 5 to 20 fold. Prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) is the goal of antibiotic prophylaxis. This study was carried out to assess the optimum timing for prophylactic antibiotic administration and to assess the amount of the antibiotic crossing the placental barrier. Methods Eligible mothers were recruited, after informed consent, once the decision for CD was made. Each mother received two injections, one prior to skin incision and one after cord clamping, (one being the study drug Cefazolin, and the other, a placebo) based on the randomization code. Demographic, maternal and neonatal monitoring data until discharge from hospital, and at the 6 weeks postpartum visit were collected. Levels of the prophylactic antibiotic were measured from the cord blood in every 8th neonate. The objective of the study was to compare the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, intravenous Cefazolin 1 g, administered at Caesarean delivery (CD) at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn. The secondary outcomes that were followed up were the number of maternal and neonatal readmissions. An appropriate test for significance, Fisher’s exact test was used to find the association between risk variables and outcome. Results The total numbers of mothers enrolled were 1106, of whom 553 mothers received antibiotic prior to skin incision (pre-incision) and 543 mothers received antibiotic after cord clamping (post-incision). The pre-incision group had significantly less febrile illness (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.29 - 0.80) and SSI (RR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.04 - 0.53) when compared with the post- incision group. The post-incision group significantly had >7 days hospital stay when compared to the 4-7 days stay of the pre-incision group (p = 0.005).There were no differences in any of the neonatal outcomes. The quantity of the antibiotic in the cord blood was only 2-3%. Conclusions Pre incision prophylactic antibiotic protected the mother from SSI and febrile illness and decreased the hospital stay significantly. Trial registration The Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI) was [ CTRI/2016/03/006710 dated, 04/03/2016].
first_indexed 2024-12-11T09:06:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7672e6ad830c43c0b38aaf7d34fb02e8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T09:06:50Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-7672e6ad830c43c0b38aaf7d34fb02e82022-12-22T01:13:37ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932017-10-011711810.1186/s12884-017-1526-yA randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newbornChinta Annie Jyothirmayi0Ajay Halder1Bijesh Yadav2Santosh Thomas Samuel3Anil Kuruvilla4Ruby Jose5Department of Neonatology, Christian Medical CollegeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit IV, Christian Medical CollegeDepartment of Biostatistics, Christian Medical CollegeMLL Hospital, MadanapalleDepartment of Neonatology, Christian Medical CollegeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit IV, Christian Medical CollegeAbstract Background Caesarean delivery (CD) increases the risk of postpartum infection by 5 to 20 fold. Prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) is the goal of antibiotic prophylaxis. This study was carried out to assess the optimum timing for prophylactic antibiotic administration and to assess the amount of the antibiotic crossing the placental barrier. Methods Eligible mothers were recruited, after informed consent, once the decision for CD was made. Each mother received two injections, one prior to skin incision and one after cord clamping, (one being the study drug Cefazolin, and the other, a placebo) based on the randomization code. Demographic, maternal and neonatal monitoring data until discharge from hospital, and at the 6 weeks postpartum visit were collected. Levels of the prophylactic antibiotic were measured from the cord blood in every 8th neonate. The objective of the study was to compare the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, intravenous Cefazolin 1 g, administered at Caesarean delivery (CD) at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn. The secondary outcomes that were followed up were the number of maternal and neonatal readmissions. An appropriate test for significance, Fisher’s exact test was used to find the association between risk variables and outcome. Results The total numbers of mothers enrolled were 1106, of whom 553 mothers received antibiotic prior to skin incision (pre-incision) and 543 mothers received antibiotic after cord clamping (post-incision). The pre-incision group had significantly less febrile illness (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.29 - 0.80) and SSI (RR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.04 - 0.53) when compared with the post- incision group. The post-incision group significantly had >7 days hospital stay when compared to the 4-7 days stay of the pre-incision group (p = 0.005).There were no differences in any of the neonatal outcomes. The quantity of the antibiotic in the cord blood was only 2-3%. Conclusions Pre incision prophylactic antibiotic protected the mother from SSI and febrile illness and decreased the hospital stay significantly. Trial registration The Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI) was [ CTRI/2016/03/006710 dated, 04/03/2016].http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-017-1526-yProphylactic antibioticCaesarian deliveryPre-incisionPost-incision
spellingShingle Chinta Annie Jyothirmayi
Ajay Halder
Bijesh Yadav
Santosh Thomas Samuel
Anil Kuruvilla
Ruby Jose
A randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prophylactic antibiotic
Caesarian delivery
Pre-incision
Post-incision
title A randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn
title_full A randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn
title_fullStr A randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn
title_short A randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn
title_sort randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic cefazolin administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings before skin incision and after cord clamping on both the mother and newborn
topic Prophylactic antibiotic
Caesarian delivery
Pre-incision
Post-incision
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-017-1526-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chintaanniejyothirmayi arandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrialcomparingtheeffectsoftheprophylacticantibioticcefazolinadministeredatcaesareandeliveryattwodifferenttimingsbeforeskinincisionandaftercordclampingonboththemotherandnewborn
AT ajayhalder arandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrialcomparingtheeffectsoftheprophylacticantibioticcefazolinadministeredatcaesareandeliveryattwodifferenttimingsbeforeskinincisionandaftercordclampingonboththemotherandnewborn
AT bijeshyadav arandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrialcomparingtheeffectsoftheprophylacticantibioticcefazolinadministeredatcaesareandeliveryattwodifferenttimingsbeforeskinincisionandaftercordclampingonboththemotherandnewborn
AT santoshthomassamuel arandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrialcomparingtheeffectsoftheprophylacticantibioticcefazolinadministeredatcaesareandeliveryattwodifferenttimingsbeforeskinincisionandaftercordclampingonboththemotherandnewborn
AT anilkuruvilla arandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrialcomparingtheeffectsoftheprophylacticantibioticcefazolinadministeredatcaesareandeliveryattwodifferenttimingsbeforeskinincisionandaftercordclampingonboththemotherandnewborn
AT rubyjose arandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrialcomparingtheeffectsoftheprophylacticantibioticcefazolinadministeredatcaesareandeliveryattwodifferenttimingsbeforeskinincisionandaftercordclampingonboththemotherandnewborn
AT chintaanniejyothirmayi randomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrialcomparingtheeffectsoftheprophylacticantibioticcefazolinadministeredatcaesareandeliveryattwodifferenttimingsbeforeskinincisionandaftercordclampingonboththemotherandnewborn
AT ajayhalder randomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrialcomparingtheeffectsoftheprophylacticantibioticcefazolinadministeredatcaesareandeliveryattwodifferenttimingsbeforeskinincisionandaftercordclampingonboththemotherandnewborn
AT bijeshyadav randomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrialcomparingtheeffectsoftheprophylacticantibioticcefazolinadministeredatcaesareandeliveryattwodifferenttimingsbeforeskinincisionandaftercordclampingonboththemotherandnewborn
AT santoshthomassamuel randomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrialcomparingtheeffectsoftheprophylacticantibioticcefazolinadministeredatcaesareandeliveryattwodifferenttimingsbeforeskinincisionandaftercordclampingonboththemotherandnewborn
AT anilkuruvilla randomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrialcomparingtheeffectsoftheprophylacticantibioticcefazolinadministeredatcaesareandeliveryattwodifferenttimingsbeforeskinincisionandaftercordclampingonboththemotherandnewborn
AT rubyjose randomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrialcomparingtheeffectsoftheprophylacticantibioticcefazolinadministeredatcaesareandeliveryattwodifferenttimingsbeforeskinincisionandaftercordclampingonboththemotherandnewborn