Epidemiologic, Postmortem Computed Tomography-Morphologic and Biomechanical Analysis of the Effects of Non-Invasive External Pelvic Stabilizers in Genuine Unstable Pelvic Injuries

Unstable pelvic injuries are rare (3–8% of all fractures) but are associated with a mortality of up to 30%. An effective way to treat venous and cancellous sources of bleeding prehospital is to reduce intrapelvic volume with external noninvasive pelvic stabilizers. Scientifically reliable data regar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian Kleber, Mirja Haussmann, Michael Hetz, Michael Tsokos, Claas T. Buschmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/19/4348
_version_ 1797516205509050368
author Christian Kleber
Mirja Haussmann
Michael Hetz
Michael Tsokos
Claas T. Buschmann
author_facet Christian Kleber
Mirja Haussmann
Michael Hetz
Michael Tsokos
Claas T. Buschmann
author_sort Christian Kleber
collection DOAJ
description Unstable pelvic injuries are rare (3–8% of all fractures) but are associated with a mortality of up to 30%. An effective way to treat venous and cancellous sources of bleeding prehospital is to reduce intrapelvic volume with external noninvasive pelvic stabilizers. Scientifically reliable data regarding pelvic volume reduction and applicable pressure are lacking. Epidemiologic data were collected, and multiple post-mortem CT scans and biomechanical measurements were performed on real, unstable pelvic injuries. Unstable pelvic injury was shown to be the leading source of bleeding in only 19%. All external non-invasive pelvic stabilizers achieved intrapelvic volume reduction; the T-POD<sup>®</sup> succeeded best on average (333 ± 234 cm<sup>3</sup>), but with higher average peak traction (110 N). The reduction results of the VBM<sup>®</sup> pneumatic pelvic sling consistently showed significantly better results at a pressure of 200 mmHg than at 100 mmHg at similar peak traction forces. All pelvic stabilizers exhibited the highest peak tensile force shortly after application. Unstable pelvic injuries must be considered as an indicator of serious concomitant injuries. Stabilization should be performed prehospital with specific pelvic stabilizers, such as the T-POD<sup>®</sup> or the VBM<sup>®</sup> pneumatic pelvic sling. We recommend adjusting the pressure recommendation of the VBM<sup>®</sup> pneumatic pelvic sling to 200 mmHg.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:57:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7679152ad1fa4a098b2f0cc114ad328a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:57:59Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-7679152ad1fa4a098b2f0cc114ad328a2023-11-22T16:18:07ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-09-011019434810.3390/jcm10194348Epidemiologic, Postmortem Computed Tomography-Morphologic and Biomechanical Analysis of the Effects of Non-Invasive External Pelvic Stabilizers in Genuine Unstable Pelvic InjuriesChristian Kleber0Mirja Haussmann1Michael Hetz2Michael Tsokos3Claas T. Buschmann4University Center of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307 Dresden, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universiätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, GermanyUniversity Center of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307 Dresden, GermanyInstitute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Charité-Universiätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, GermanyInstitute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Charité-Universiätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, GermanyUnstable pelvic injuries are rare (3–8% of all fractures) but are associated with a mortality of up to 30%. An effective way to treat venous and cancellous sources of bleeding prehospital is to reduce intrapelvic volume with external noninvasive pelvic stabilizers. Scientifically reliable data regarding pelvic volume reduction and applicable pressure are lacking. Epidemiologic data were collected, and multiple post-mortem CT scans and biomechanical measurements were performed on real, unstable pelvic injuries. Unstable pelvic injury was shown to be the leading source of bleeding in only 19%. All external non-invasive pelvic stabilizers achieved intrapelvic volume reduction; the T-POD<sup>®</sup> succeeded best on average (333 ± 234 cm<sup>3</sup>), but with higher average peak traction (110 N). The reduction results of the VBM<sup>®</sup> pneumatic pelvic sling consistently showed significantly better results at a pressure of 200 mmHg than at 100 mmHg at similar peak traction forces. All pelvic stabilizers exhibited the highest peak tensile force shortly after application. Unstable pelvic injuries must be considered as an indicator of serious concomitant injuries. Stabilization should be performed prehospital with specific pelvic stabilizers, such as the T-POD<sup>®</sup> or the VBM<sup>®</sup> pneumatic pelvic sling. We recommend adjusting the pressure recommendation of the VBM<sup>®</sup> pneumatic pelvic sling to 200 mmHg.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/19/4348traumanon-invasive external pelvic stabilizersbleedingpelvic fracturespost mortem analysisbiomechanical force
spellingShingle Christian Kleber
Mirja Haussmann
Michael Hetz
Michael Tsokos
Claas T. Buschmann
Epidemiologic, Postmortem Computed Tomography-Morphologic and Biomechanical Analysis of the Effects of Non-Invasive External Pelvic Stabilizers in Genuine Unstable Pelvic Injuries
Journal of Clinical Medicine
trauma
non-invasive external pelvic stabilizers
bleeding
pelvic fractures
post mortem analysis
biomechanical force
title Epidemiologic, Postmortem Computed Tomography-Morphologic and Biomechanical Analysis of the Effects of Non-Invasive External Pelvic Stabilizers in Genuine Unstable Pelvic Injuries
title_full Epidemiologic, Postmortem Computed Tomography-Morphologic and Biomechanical Analysis of the Effects of Non-Invasive External Pelvic Stabilizers in Genuine Unstable Pelvic Injuries
title_fullStr Epidemiologic, Postmortem Computed Tomography-Morphologic and Biomechanical Analysis of the Effects of Non-Invasive External Pelvic Stabilizers in Genuine Unstable Pelvic Injuries
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiologic, Postmortem Computed Tomography-Morphologic and Biomechanical Analysis of the Effects of Non-Invasive External Pelvic Stabilizers in Genuine Unstable Pelvic Injuries
title_short Epidemiologic, Postmortem Computed Tomography-Morphologic and Biomechanical Analysis of the Effects of Non-Invasive External Pelvic Stabilizers in Genuine Unstable Pelvic Injuries
title_sort epidemiologic postmortem computed tomography morphologic and biomechanical analysis of the effects of non invasive external pelvic stabilizers in genuine unstable pelvic injuries
topic trauma
non-invasive external pelvic stabilizers
bleeding
pelvic fractures
post mortem analysis
biomechanical force
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/19/4348
work_keys_str_mv AT christiankleber epidemiologicpostmortemcomputedtomographymorphologicandbiomechanicalanalysisoftheeffectsofnoninvasiveexternalpelvicstabilizersingenuineunstablepelvicinjuries
AT mirjahaussmann epidemiologicpostmortemcomputedtomographymorphologicandbiomechanicalanalysisoftheeffectsofnoninvasiveexternalpelvicstabilizersingenuineunstablepelvicinjuries
AT michaelhetz epidemiologicpostmortemcomputedtomographymorphologicandbiomechanicalanalysisoftheeffectsofnoninvasiveexternalpelvicstabilizersingenuineunstablepelvicinjuries
AT michaeltsokos epidemiologicpostmortemcomputedtomographymorphologicandbiomechanicalanalysisoftheeffectsofnoninvasiveexternalpelvicstabilizersingenuineunstablepelvicinjuries
AT claastbuschmann epidemiologicpostmortemcomputedtomographymorphologicandbiomechanicalanalysisoftheeffectsofnoninvasiveexternalpelvicstabilizersingenuineunstablepelvicinjuries