Speaking Too Soon: The Sabotage of Bail Reform in New South Wales

Within just over one month of coming into operation in May 2014, the new <em>Bail Act 2013</em> (NSW), a product of long-term law reform consideration, was reviewed and then amended after talk-back radio ‘shock jock’ and tabloid newspaper outcry over three cases. This article examines th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Quilter, David Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Queensland University of Technology 2014-10-01
Series:International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/181
_version_ 1818668514072854528
author Julia Quilter
David Brown
author_facet Julia Quilter
David Brown
author_sort Julia Quilter
collection DOAJ
description Within just over one month of coming into operation in May 2014, the new <em>Bail Act 2013</em> (NSW), a product of long-term law reform consideration, was reviewed and then amended after talk-back radio ‘shock jock’ and tabloid newspaper outcry over three cases. This article examines the media triggers, the main arguments of the review conducted by former New South Wales (NSW) Attorney General John Hatzistergos, and the amendments, with our analysis of the judicial interpretation of the Act thus far providing relevant background. We argue that the amendments are premature, unnecessary, create complexity and confusion, and, quite possibly, will have unintended consequences: in short, they are a mess. The whole process of reversal is an example of law and order politics driven by the shock jocks and tabloid media, the views of which, are based on fundamental misconceptions of the purpose of bail and its place in the criminal process, resulting in a conflation of accusation, guilt and punishment. Other consequences of the review and amendments process recognised in this article include the denigration of judicial expertise and lack of concern with evidence and process; the disproportionate influence of the shock jocks, tabloids and Police Association of NSW on policy formation; the practice of using retired politicians to produce ‘quick fix’ reviews; and the political failure to understand and defend fundamental legal principles that benefit us all and are central to the maintenance of a democratic society and the rule of law. The article concludes with some discussion of ways in which media and political debate might be conducted to produce more balanced outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T06:37:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-767b0f31aa1d4ed2a7b4d5703ba0e121
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2202-7998
2202-8005
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T06:37:31Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher Queensland University of Technology
record_format Article
series International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
spelling doaj.art-767b0f31aa1d4ed2a7b4d5703ba0e1212022-12-21T21:59:57ZengQueensland University of TechnologyInternational Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy2202-79982202-80052014-10-0133739710.5204/ijcjsd.v3i2.181148Speaking Too Soon: The Sabotage of Bail Reform in New South WalesJulia Quilter0David Brown1University of WollongongUniversity of NSWWithin just over one month of coming into operation in May 2014, the new <em>Bail Act 2013</em> (NSW), a product of long-term law reform consideration, was reviewed and then amended after talk-back radio ‘shock jock’ and tabloid newspaper outcry over three cases. This article examines the media triggers, the main arguments of the review conducted by former New South Wales (NSW) Attorney General John Hatzistergos, and the amendments, with our analysis of the judicial interpretation of the Act thus far providing relevant background. We argue that the amendments are premature, unnecessary, create complexity and confusion, and, quite possibly, will have unintended consequences: in short, they are a mess. The whole process of reversal is an example of law and order politics driven by the shock jocks and tabloid media, the views of which, are based on fundamental misconceptions of the purpose of bail and its place in the criminal process, resulting in a conflation of accusation, guilt and punishment. Other consequences of the review and amendments process recognised in this article include the denigration of judicial expertise and lack of concern with evidence and process; the disproportionate influence of the shock jocks, tabloids and Police Association of NSW on policy formation; the practice of using retired politicians to produce ‘quick fix’ reviews; and the political failure to understand and defend fundamental legal principles that benefit us all and are central to the maintenance of a democratic society and the rule of law. The article concludes with some discussion of ways in which media and political debate might be conducted to produce more balanced outcomes.https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/181Bailmediacriminal law reformNew South WalesBail Act 2013 (NSW)unacceptable risk.
spellingShingle Julia Quilter
David Brown
Speaking Too Soon: The Sabotage of Bail Reform in New South Wales
International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
Bail
media
criminal law reform
New South Wales
Bail Act 2013 (NSW)
unacceptable risk.
title Speaking Too Soon: The Sabotage of Bail Reform in New South Wales
title_full Speaking Too Soon: The Sabotage of Bail Reform in New South Wales
title_fullStr Speaking Too Soon: The Sabotage of Bail Reform in New South Wales
title_full_unstemmed Speaking Too Soon: The Sabotage of Bail Reform in New South Wales
title_short Speaking Too Soon: The Sabotage of Bail Reform in New South Wales
title_sort speaking too soon the sabotage of bail reform in new south wales
topic Bail
media
criminal law reform
New South Wales
Bail Act 2013 (NSW)
unacceptable risk.
url https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/181
work_keys_str_mv AT juliaquilter speakingtoosoonthesabotageofbailreforminnewsouthwales
AT davidbrown speakingtoosoonthesabotageofbailreforminnewsouthwales