FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE
The text explores ways/possibilities of the civil procedure to serve as a democratic space of participation and construction of the law from a critical analysis of its architecture (object, device, contradictory), because the constitutionalisation of the process brings to the center the fair process...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/45083/31763 |
_version_ | 1818594625652260864 |
---|---|
author | Darci Guimarães Ribeiro Paulo Junior Trindade dos Santos Gabriela Samrsla Möller |
author_facet | Darci Guimarães Ribeiro Paulo Junior Trindade dos Santos Gabriela Samrsla Möller |
author_sort | Darci Guimarães Ribeiro |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The text explores ways/possibilities of the civil procedure to serve as a democratic space of participation and construction of the law from a critical analysis of its architecture (object, device, contradictory), because the constitutionalisation of the process brings to the center the fair process, where the procedural contradiction (procedural debate) allows the process to be a channel of contextual opening for the right and performing effective guardianship. It is proposed that the contradictory is a channel of openness to speak in a new device principle, flexibility of procedural congruence and justification by the object of the procedural debate. The civil process gains special importance in front of a dynamic and complex society, marked by the juridicization of life, which seeks in the judicial channel of claim and struggle for rights and this relief acquired mainly after the constitutionalization of the right requires that institutes that compose the architecture of the process are revisited in the search for a democratic-participatory path for legal hermeneutics. The reflection emphasizes the importance of the contradictory as a moment of participation of the parties in the construction of the right for the protection of fundamental rights, thus being able to begin to speak in a fair process. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-16T11:03:06Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-76814d7c1dae4daa830084c7d80a63bf |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1982-7636 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-16T11:03:06Z |
publishDate | 2020-04-01 |
publisher | Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
spelling | doaj.art-76814d7c1dae4daa830084c7d80a63bf2022-12-21T22:33:57ZengUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRevista Eletrônica de Direito Processual1982-76362020-04-012113158https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2020.45083FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDUREDarci Guimarães Ribeiro0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3688-5501Paulo Junior Trindade dos Santos1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9092-3391Gabriela Samrsla Möller2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3688-5501Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUC-RS), Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora, Altos Estudios do IEAUNOESCUNOESCThe text explores ways/possibilities of the civil procedure to serve as a democratic space of participation and construction of the law from a critical analysis of its architecture (object, device, contradictory), because the constitutionalisation of the process brings to the center the fair process, where the procedural contradiction (procedural debate) allows the process to be a channel of contextual opening for the right and performing effective guardianship. It is proposed that the contradictory is a channel of openness to speak in a new device principle, flexibility of procedural congruence and justification by the object of the procedural debate. The civil process gains special importance in front of a dynamic and complex society, marked by the juridicization of life, which seeks in the judicial channel of claim and struggle for rights and this relief acquired mainly after the constitutionalization of the right requires that institutes that compose the architecture of the process are revisited in the search for a democratic-participatory path for legal hermeneutics. The reflection emphasizes the importance of the contradictory as a moment of participation of the parties in the construction of the right for the protection of fundamental rights, thus being able to begin to speak in a fair process.https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/45083/31763civil procedurecontradictoryfundamental rightsfair procedure |
spellingShingle | Darci Guimarães Ribeiro Paulo Junior Trindade dos Santos Gabriela Samrsla Möller FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual civil procedure contradictory fundamental rights fair procedure |
title | FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE |
title_full | FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE |
title_fullStr | FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE |
title_full_unstemmed | FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE |
title_short | FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE |
title_sort | from the process debate and process development the contradictory as fundamental right to fair procedure |
topic | civil procedure contradictory fundamental rights fair procedure |
url | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/45083/31763 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT darciguimaraesribeiro fromtheprocessdebateandprocessdevelopmentthecontradictoryasfundamentalrighttofairprocedure AT paulojuniortrindadedossantos fromtheprocessdebateandprocessdevelopmentthecontradictoryasfundamentalrighttofairprocedure AT gabrielasamrslamoller fromtheprocessdebateandprocessdevelopmentthecontradictoryasfundamentalrighttofairprocedure |