FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE

The text explores ways/possibilities of the civil procedure to serve as a democratic space of participation and construction of the law from a critical analysis of its architecture (object, device, contradictory), because the constitutionalisation of the process brings to the center the fair process...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Darci Guimarães Ribeiro, Paulo Junior Trindade dos Santos, Gabriela Samrsla Möller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro 2020-04-01
Series:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/45083/31763
_version_ 1818594625652260864
author Darci Guimarães Ribeiro
Paulo Junior Trindade dos Santos
Gabriela Samrsla Möller
author_facet Darci Guimarães Ribeiro
Paulo Junior Trindade dos Santos
Gabriela Samrsla Möller
author_sort Darci Guimarães Ribeiro
collection DOAJ
description The text explores ways/possibilities of the civil procedure to serve as a democratic space of participation and construction of the law from a critical analysis of its architecture (object, device, contradictory), because the constitutionalisation of the process brings to the center the fair process, where the procedural contradiction (procedural debate) allows the process to be a channel of contextual opening for the right and performing effective guardianship. It is proposed that the contradictory is a channel of openness to speak in a new device principle, flexibility of procedural congruence and justification by the object of the procedural debate. The civil process gains special importance in front of a dynamic and complex society, marked by the juridicization of life, which seeks in the judicial channel of claim and struggle for rights and this relief acquired mainly after the constitutionalization of the right requires that institutes that compose the architecture of the process are revisited in the search for a democratic-participatory path for legal hermeneutics. The reflection emphasizes the importance of the contradictory as a moment of participation of the parties in the construction of the right for the protection of fundamental rights, thus being able to begin to speak in a fair process.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T11:03:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76814d7c1dae4daa830084c7d80a63bf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1982-7636
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T11:03:06Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
record_format Article
series Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
spelling doaj.art-76814d7c1dae4daa830084c7d80a63bf2022-12-21T22:33:57ZengUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRevista Eletrônica de Direito Processual1982-76362020-04-012113158https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2020.45083FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDUREDarci Guimarães Ribeiro0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3688-5501Paulo Junior Trindade dos Santos1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9092-3391Gabriela Samrsla Möller2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3688-5501Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUC-RS), Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora, Altos Estudios do IEAUNOESCUNOESCThe text explores ways/possibilities of the civil procedure to serve as a democratic space of participation and construction of the law from a critical analysis of its architecture (object, device, contradictory), because the constitutionalisation of the process brings to the center the fair process, where the procedural contradiction (procedural debate) allows the process to be a channel of contextual opening for the right and performing effective guardianship. It is proposed that the contradictory is a channel of openness to speak in a new device principle, flexibility of procedural congruence and justification by the object of the procedural debate. The civil process gains special importance in front of a dynamic and complex society, marked by the juridicization of life, which seeks in the judicial channel of claim and struggle for rights and this relief acquired mainly after the constitutionalization of the right requires that institutes that compose the architecture of the process are revisited in the search for a democratic-participatory path for legal hermeneutics. The reflection emphasizes the importance of the contradictory as a moment of participation of the parties in the construction of the right for the protection of fundamental rights, thus being able to begin to speak in a fair process.https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/45083/31763civil procedurecontradictoryfundamental rightsfair procedure
spellingShingle Darci Guimarães Ribeiro
Paulo Junior Trindade dos Santos
Gabriela Samrsla Möller
FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
civil procedure
contradictory
fundamental rights
fair procedure
title FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE
title_full FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE
title_fullStr FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE
title_full_unstemmed FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE
title_short FROM THE PROCESS DEBATE AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT: THE CONTRADICTORY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEDURE
title_sort from the process debate and process development the contradictory as fundamental right to fair procedure
topic civil procedure
contradictory
fundamental rights
fair procedure
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/45083/31763
work_keys_str_mv AT darciguimaraesribeiro fromtheprocessdebateandprocessdevelopmentthecontradictoryasfundamentalrighttofairprocedure
AT paulojuniortrindadedossantos fromtheprocessdebateandprocessdevelopmentthecontradictoryasfundamentalrighttofairprocedure
AT gabrielasamrslamoller fromtheprocessdebateandprocessdevelopmentthecontradictoryasfundamentalrighttofairprocedure