Clinical and echocardiographic response of apical vs nonapical right ventricular lead position in CRT: A meta‐analysis
Abstract Background Traditionally the right ventricular (RV) pacing lead is placed in the RV apex in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). It is not clear whether nonapical placement of the RV lead is associated with a better response to CRT. We aimed to perform a meta‐analysis of all randomized...
Main Authors: | Sharan Prakash Sharma, Khagendra Dahal, Paari Dominic, Rajbir S. Sangha |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2018-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Arrhythmia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12041 |
Similar Items
-
Right Ventricular Septal Versus Apical Pacing: Long-Term Incidence of Heart Failure and Survival
by: André Dias-Frias, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) —Its History, Indication, Usefulness and Problems—
by: Kazuo Matsumoto, MD
Published: (2007-01-01) -
Which Is More Likely to Achieve Cardiac Synchronization: Left Bundle Branch Pacing or Left Ventricular Septal Pacing?
by: Kailun Zhu, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Ejection fraction improvement in left ventricular-only pacing vs. BiVentricular pacing in patients with heart failure
by: Randa Tabbah, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Long-term effectiveness of right septal pacing vs. right apical pacing in patients with atrioventricular block
by: Miwa Kikuchi, MD, et al.
Published: (2012-08-01)