Direct Membrane Filtration of Wastewater: A Comparison between Real and Synthetic Wastewater

In this study, a lab scale direct membrane filtration (DMF) system using ultrafiltration membranes was operated to compare synthetic and real wastewater to evaluate their membrane fouling propensity and the partitioning of organics and nutrients during concentration. For fouling prevention, cyclic o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmet Erkan Uman, Robert A. Bair, Daniel H. Yeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/16/3/405
_version_ 1797318189316571136
author Ahmet Erkan Uman
Robert A. Bair
Daniel H. Yeh
author_facet Ahmet Erkan Uman
Robert A. Bair
Daniel H. Yeh
author_sort Ahmet Erkan Uman
collection DOAJ
description In this study, a lab scale direct membrane filtration (DMF) system using ultrafiltration membranes was operated to compare synthetic and real wastewater to evaluate their membrane fouling propensity and the partitioning of organics and nutrients during concentration. For fouling prevention, cyclic operation was used which consisted of 90 s of filtration followed by 15 s of relaxation and backwashing conducted every 15 min. The system was tested at a high initial flux of 80 LMH (L/m<sup>2</sup>·h), and the trials were run until a 90% volume reduction was achieved for each batch. Both the synthetic and real wastewater showed similar fouling propensities and organic and nutrient partitioning. The synthetic and real wastewater had an average flux of 46.3 LMH and 28.5 LMH and an average total chemical oxygen demand rejection of 90.3% and 83.1% after 30 h of operation, respectively. The recovery of organics was similar in both influents, resulting in 65.5% and 64.0% of the total chemical oxygen demand concentrations in the concentrate stream for synthetic and real wastewaters, respectively. The total phosphorous and nitrogen concentrations were also similar in terms of rejection rates resulting in 85% and 78% for the synthetic and 89% and 65% for the fresh WWs, respectively. The comparison revealed that synthetic wastewater, though not identical to real wastewater, can serve as a surrogate in DMF studies. This will help to remove one of the key sources of variability in current DMF studies and will allow for more rapid development of DMF technology.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T03:46:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7697eab983ec43bea30ea8e9255851ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T03:46:53Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-7697eab983ec43bea30ea8e9255851ee2024-02-09T15:24:28ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412024-01-0116340510.3390/w16030405Direct Membrane Filtration of Wastewater: A Comparison between Real and Synthetic WastewaterAhmet Erkan Uman0Robert A. Bair1Daniel H. Yeh2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33617, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33617, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33617, USAIn this study, a lab scale direct membrane filtration (DMF) system using ultrafiltration membranes was operated to compare synthetic and real wastewater to evaluate their membrane fouling propensity and the partitioning of organics and nutrients during concentration. For fouling prevention, cyclic operation was used which consisted of 90 s of filtration followed by 15 s of relaxation and backwashing conducted every 15 min. The system was tested at a high initial flux of 80 LMH (L/m<sup>2</sup>·h), and the trials were run until a 90% volume reduction was achieved for each batch. Both the synthetic and real wastewater showed similar fouling propensities and organic and nutrient partitioning. The synthetic and real wastewater had an average flux of 46.3 LMH and 28.5 LMH and an average total chemical oxygen demand rejection of 90.3% and 83.1% after 30 h of operation, respectively. The recovery of organics was similar in both influents, resulting in 65.5% and 64.0% of the total chemical oxygen demand concentrations in the concentrate stream for synthetic and real wastewaters, respectively. The total phosphorous and nitrogen concentrations were also similar in terms of rejection rates resulting in 85% and 78% for the synthetic and 89% and 65% for the fresh WWs, respectively. The comparison revealed that synthetic wastewater, though not identical to real wastewater, can serve as a surrogate in DMF studies. This will help to remove one of the key sources of variability in current DMF studies and will allow for more rapid development of DMF technology.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/16/3/405direct membrane filtrationsynthetic wastewatermunicipal wastewaterultrafiltration
spellingShingle Ahmet Erkan Uman
Robert A. Bair
Daniel H. Yeh
Direct Membrane Filtration of Wastewater: A Comparison between Real and Synthetic Wastewater
Water
direct membrane filtration
synthetic wastewater
municipal wastewater
ultrafiltration
title Direct Membrane Filtration of Wastewater: A Comparison between Real and Synthetic Wastewater
title_full Direct Membrane Filtration of Wastewater: A Comparison between Real and Synthetic Wastewater
title_fullStr Direct Membrane Filtration of Wastewater: A Comparison between Real and Synthetic Wastewater
title_full_unstemmed Direct Membrane Filtration of Wastewater: A Comparison between Real and Synthetic Wastewater
title_short Direct Membrane Filtration of Wastewater: A Comparison between Real and Synthetic Wastewater
title_sort direct membrane filtration of wastewater a comparison between real and synthetic wastewater
topic direct membrane filtration
synthetic wastewater
municipal wastewater
ultrafiltration
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/16/3/405
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmeterkanuman directmembranefiltrationofwastewateracomparisonbetweenrealandsyntheticwastewater
AT robertabair directmembranefiltrationofwastewateracomparisonbetweenrealandsyntheticwastewater
AT danielhyeh directmembranefiltrationofwastewateracomparisonbetweenrealandsyntheticwastewater