Comparison of Routine Fixation of Tissues with Rapid Tissue Fixation

Introduction: Conventional formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue provides superior cellular morphology and long-term storage. Problems with formalin fixation comprise delay of fixation and variations in the duration of fixation. Microwave assisted tissue fixation removes the use of noxious an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meenakshi Tripathi, Rani Bansal, Mamta Gupta, Vinay Bharat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2013-12-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/3754/31-%206233_E(C)_F(T)_PF1(VP)_PFA(H)_PF2(PP).pdf
_version_ 1811267743296520192
author Meenakshi Tripathi
Rani Bansal
Mamta Gupta
Vinay Bharat
author_facet Meenakshi Tripathi
Rani Bansal
Mamta Gupta
Vinay Bharat
author_sort Meenakshi Tripathi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Conventional formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue provides superior cellular morphology and long-term storage. Problems with formalin fixation comprise delay of fixation and variations in the duration of fixation. Microwave assisted tissue fixation removes the use of noxious and potentially toxic formalin that decreases the turnaround time and creates a personnel friendly workflow. Material and Methods: The present study was conducted over a period of two years. One hundred and forty paired tissue sections were taken including both neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues. One of the paired tissues was fixed in formalin and the other was fixed by using microwave irradiation in phosphate buffered saline. Both were then processed by conventional method. Each slide was examined and rated for the adequacy of fixation by two pathologists in a blinded fashion using 7 parameters: Cellular outline, cytoplasmic detail, nuclear detail, erythrocyte integrity, lymphocyte appearance, overall morphology and overall staining. Results: Statistical analysis showed that sections obtained from microwave fixed tissues were comparable to that of routinely fixed tissue. The p-values of all parameters were not significant except for the overall morphology for which p-value was significant owing to loss of tissue in some cases. Conclusion: Microwave irradiation substantially shortened the time from specimen reception to diagnosis (turnaround time) and allowed same-day tissue processing and diagnosis of specimens without compromising the overall quality of the histologic section.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T21:09:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76b9190187754a10b17634bd47bb307d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T21:09:33Z
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-76b9190187754a10b17634bd47bb307d2022-12-22T03:16:38ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2013-12-017122768277310.7860/JCDR/2013/6233.3754Comparison of Routine Fixation of Tissues with Rapid Tissue FixationMeenakshi Tripathi0Rani Bansal1Mamta Gupta2Vinay Bharat3Post Graduate Student, Department of Pathology, Subharti University, Meerut, India.Professor & Head, Department of Pathology, Subharti University, Meerut, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Subharti University, Meerut, India.Professor, Deptartment of Pathology, Subharti Medical College, Meerut, India.Introduction: Conventional formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue provides superior cellular morphology and long-term storage. Problems with formalin fixation comprise delay of fixation and variations in the duration of fixation. Microwave assisted tissue fixation removes the use of noxious and potentially toxic formalin that decreases the turnaround time and creates a personnel friendly workflow. Material and Methods: The present study was conducted over a period of two years. One hundred and forty paired tissue sections were taken including both neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues. One of the paired tissues was fixed in formalin and the other was fixed by using microwave irradiation in phosphate buffered saline. Both were then processed by conventional method. Each slide was examined and rated for the adequacy of fixation by two pathologists in a blinded fashion using 7 parameters: Cellular outline, cytoplasmic detail, nuclear detail, erythrocyte integrity, lymphocyte appearance, overall morphology and overall staining. Results: Statistical analysis showed that sections obtained from microwave fixed tissues were comparable to that of routinely fixed tissue. The p-values of all parameters were not significant except for the overall morphology for which p-value was significant owing to loss of tissue in some cases. Conclusion: Microwave irradiation substantially shortened the time from specimen reception to diagnosis (turnaround time) and allowed same-day tissue processing and diagnosis of specimens without compromising the overall quality of the histologic section.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/3754/31-%206233_E(C)_F(T)_PF1(VP)_PFA(H)_PF2(PP).pdfmicrowavefixationturnaround time
spellingShingle Meenakshi Tripathi
Rani Bansal
Mamta Gupta
Vinay Bharat
Comparison of Routine Fixation of Tissues with Rapid Tissue Fixation
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
microwave
fixation
turnaround time
title Comparison of Routine Fixation of Tissues with Rapid Tissue Fixation
title_full Comparison of Routine Fixation of Tissues with Rapid Tissue Fixation
title_fullStr Comparison of Routine Fixation of Tissues with Rapid Tissue Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Routine Fixation of Tissues with Rapid Tissue Fixation
title_short Comparison of Routine Fixation of Tissues with Rapid Tissue Fixation
title_sort comparison of routine fixation of tissues with rapid tissue fixation
topic microwave
fixation
turnaround time
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/3754/31-%206233_E(C)_F(T)_PF1(VP)_PFA(H)_PF2(PP).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT meenakshitripathi comparisonofroutinefixationoftissueswithrapidtissuefixation
AT ranibansal comparisonofroutinefixationoftissueswithrapidtissuefixation
AT mamtagupta comparisonofroutinefixationoftissueswithrapidtissuefixation
AT vinaybharat comparisonofroutinefixationoftissueswithrapidtissuefixation