Connecting regional aerosol emissions reductions to local and remote precipitation responses
<p>The unintended climatic implications of aerosol and precursor emission reductions implemented to protect public health are poorly understood. We investigate the precipitation response to regional changes in aerosol emissions using three coupled chemistry–climate models: NOAA Geophysical...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2018-08-01
|
| Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
| Online Access: | https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/12461/2018/acp-18-12461-2018.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818499659146985472 |
|---|---|
| author | D. M. Westervelt D. M. Westervelt A. J. Conley A. M. Fiore A. M. Fiore J.-F. Lamarque D. T. Shindell M. Previdi N. R. Mascioli N. R. Mascioli G. Faluvegi G. Faluvegi G. Correa L. W. Horowitz |
| author_facet | D. M. Westervelt D. M. Westervelt A. J. Conley A. M. Fiore A. M. Fiore J.-F. Lamarque D. T. Shindell M. Previdi N. R. Mascioli N. R. Mascioli G. Faluvegi G. Faluvegi G. Correa L. W. Horowitz |
| author_sort | D. M. Westervelt |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>The unintended climatic implications of aerosol and precursor
emission reductions implemented to protect public health are poorly
understood. We investigate the precipitation response to regional changes in
aerosol emissions using three coupled chemistry–climate models: NOAA
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Coupled Model 3 (GFDL-CM3), NCAR
Community Earth System Model (CESM1), and NASA Goddard Institute for Space
Studies ModelE2 (GISS-E2). Our approach contrasts a long present-day control
simulation from each model (up to 400 years with perpetual year 2000 or 2005
emissions) with 14 individual aerosol emissions perturbation
simulations (160–240 years each). We perturb emissions of sulfur dioxide
and/or carbonaceous aerosol within six world regions and assess the
significance of precipitation responses relative to internal variability
determined by the control simulation and across the models. Global and
regional precipitation mostly increases when we reduce regional aerosol
emissions in the models, with the strongest responses occurring for sulfur
dioxide emissions reductions from Europe and the United States.
Precipitation responses to aerosol emissions reductions are largest in the
tropics and project onto the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO).
Regressing precipitation onto an Indo-Pacific zonal sea level pressure
gradient index (a proxy for ENSO) indicates that the ENSO component of the
precipitation response to regional aerosol removal can be as large as 20 %
of the total simulated response. Precipitation increases in the Sahel in
response to aerosol reductions in remote regions because an anomalous
interhemispheric temperature gradient alters the position of the
Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). This mechanism holds across multiple
aerosol reduction simulations and models.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T20:32:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-76c39054c7a34f0c88391b3db4a1f062 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1680-7316 1680-7324 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T20:32:28Z |
| publishDate | 2018-08-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
| spelling | doaj.art-76c39054c7a34f0c88391b3db4a1f0622022-12-22T01:34:37ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242018-08-0118124611247510.5194/acp-18-12461-2018Connecting regional aerosol emissions reductions to local and remote precipitation responsesD. M. Westervelt0D. M. Westervelt1A. J. Conley2A. M. Fiore3A. M. Fiore4J.-F. Lamarque5D. T. Shindell6M. Previdi7N. R. Mascioli8N. R. Mascioli9G. Faluvegi10G. Faluvegi11G. Correa12L. W. Horowitz13Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USANASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York, USANational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USALamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USADepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USANational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USANicholas School of the Environment, Duke University. Durham, North Carolina, USALamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USALamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USADepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USANASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York, USACenter for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, New York, USALamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USANational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey, USA<p>The unintended climatic implications of aerosol and precursor emission reductions implemented to protect public health are poorly understood. We investigate the precipitation response to regional changes in aerosol emissions using three coupled chemistry–climate models: NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Coupled Model 3 (GFDL-CM3), NCAR Community Earth System Model (CESM1), and NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE2 (GISS-E2). Our approach contrasts a long present-day control simulation from each model (up to 400 years with perpetual year 2000 or 2005 emissions) with 14 individual aerosol emissions perturbation simulations (160–240 years each). We perturb emissions of sulfur dioxide and/or carbonaceous aerosol within six world regions and assess the significance of precipitation responses relative to internal variability determined by the control simulation and across the models. Global and regional precipitation mostly increases when we reduce regional aerosol emissions in the models, with the strongest responses occurring for sulfur dioxide emissions reductions from Europe and the United States. Precipitation responses to aerosol emissions reductions are largest in the tropics and project onto the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Regressing precipitation onto an Indo-Pacific zonal sea level pressure gradient index (a proxy for ENSO) indicates that the ENSO component of the precipitation response to regional aerosol removal can be as large as 20 % of the total simulated response. Precipitation increases in the Sahel in response to aerosol reductions in remote regions because an anomalous interhemispheric temperature gradient alters the position of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). This mechanism holds across multiple aerosol reduction simulations and models.</p>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/12461/2018/acp-18-12461-2018.pdf |
| spellingShingle | D. M. Westervelt D. M. Westervelt A. J. Conley A. M. Fiore A. M. Fiore J.-F. Lamarque D. T. Shindell M. Previdi N. R. Mascioli N. R. Mascioli G. Faluvegi G. Faluvegi G. Correa L. W. Horowitz Connecting regional aerosol emissions reductions to local and remote precipitation responses Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
| title | Connecting regional aerosol emissions reductions to local and remote precipitation responses |
| title_full | Connecting regional aerosol emissions reductions to local and remote precipitation responses |
| title_fullStr | Connecting regional aerosol emissions reductions to local and remote precipitation responses |
| title_full_unstemmed | Connecting regional aerosol emissions reductions to local and remote precipitation responses |
| title_short | Connecting regional aerosol emissions reductions to local and remote precipitation responses |
| title_sort | connecting regional aerosol emissions reductions to local and remote precipitation responses |
| url | https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/12461/2018/acp-18-12461-2018.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dmwestervelt connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT dmwestervelt connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT ajconley connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT amfiore connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT amfiore connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT jflamarque connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT dtshindell connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT mprevidi connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT nrmascioli connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT nrmascioli connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT gfaluvegi connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT gfaluvegi connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT gcorrea connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses AT lwhorowitz connectingregionalaerosolemissionsreductionstolocalandremoteprecipitationresponses |