When it comes to Earth observations in AI for disaster risk reduction, is it feast or famine? A topical review

Earth observations (EOs) have successfully been used to train artificial intelligence (AI)-based models in the field of disaster risk reduction (DRR) contributing to tools such as disaster early warning systems. Given the number of in situ and remote (e.g. radiosonde/satellite) monitoring devices, t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monique M Kuglitsch, Arif Albayrak, Jürg Luterbacher, Allison Craddock, Andrea Toreti, Jackie Ma, Paula Padrino Vilela, Elena Xoplaki, Rui Kotani, Dominique Berod, Jon Cox, Ivanka Pelivan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acf601
_version_ 1827815227749564416
author Monique M Kuglitsch
Arif Albayrak
Jürg Luterbacher
Allison Craddock
Andrea Toreti
Jackie Ma
Paula Padrino Vilela
Elena Xoplaki
Rui Kotani
Dominique Berod
Jon Cox
Ivanka Pelivan
author_facet Monique M Kuglitsch
Arif Albayrak
Jürg Luterbacher
Allison Craddock
Andrea Toreti
Jackie Ma
Paula Padrino Vilela
Elena Xoplaki
Rui Kotani
Dominique Berod
Jon Cox
Ivanka Pelivan
author_sort Monique M Kuglitsch
collection DOAJ
description Earth observations (EOs) have successfully been used to train artificial intelligence (AI)-based models in the field of disaster risk reduction (DRR) contributing to tools such as disaster early warning systems. Given the number of in situ and remote (e.g. radiosonde/satellite) monitoring devices, there is a common perception that there are no limits to the availability of EO for immediate use in such AI-based models. However, a mere fraction of EO is actually being used in this way. This topical review draws on use cases, workshop presentations, literature, and consultation with experts from key institutes to explore reasons for this discrepancy. Specifically, it evaluates the types of EO needed to train AI-based models for DRR applications and identifies the main characteristics, possible challenges, and innovative solutions for EO. Finally, it suggests ways to make EO more user ready and to facilitate its uptake in AI for DRR and beyond.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T23:57:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76c7670465f049ada5163d93315e8139
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T23:57:11Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-76c7670465f049ada5163d93315e81392023-09-18T07:51:33ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262023-01-0118909300410.1088/1748-9326/acf601When it comes to Earth observations in AI for disaster risk reduction, is it feast or famine? A topical reviewMonique M Kuglitsch0Arif Albayrak1Jürg Luterbacher2Allison Craddock3Andrea Toreti4Jackie Ma5Paula Padrino Vilela6Elena Xoplaki7Rui Kotani8Dominique Berod9Jon Cox10Ivanka Pelivan11Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute , Berlin, GermanyNASA Goddard Space Flight Center , Greenbelt, MD, United States of AmericaWorld Meteorological Organization , Geneva, SwitzerlandNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA, United States of AmericaEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre , Ispra, ItalyFraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute , Berlin, GermanyUN Environment , Geneva, SwitzerlandDepartment of Geography, Climatology, Climate Dynamics and Climate Change, Justus Liebig University Giessen , Giessen, Germany; Centre of International Development and Environmental Research, Justus Liebig University Giessen , Giessen, GermanyGroup on Earth Observations , Geneva, SwitzerlandWorld Meteorological Organization , Geneva, SwitzerlandWorld Meteorological Organization , Geneva, SwitzerlandFraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute , Berlin, GermanyEarth observations (EOs) have successfully been used to train artificial intelligence (AI)-based models in the field of disaster risk reduction (DRR) contributing to tools such as disaster early warning systems. Given the number of in situ and remote (e.g. radiosonde/satellite) monitoring devices, there is a common perception that there are no limits to the availability of EO for immediate use in such AI-based models. However, a mere fraction of EO is actually being used in this way. This topical review draws on use cases, workshop presentations, literature, and consultation with experts from key institutes to explore reasons for this discrepancy. Specifically, it evaluates the types of EO needed to train AI-based models for DRR applications and identifies the main characteristics, possible challenges, and innovative solutions for EO. Finally, it suggests ways to make EO more user ready and to facilitate its uptake in AI for DRR and beyond.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acf601Earth observationremote sensingdisaster risk reductionartificial intelligencemachine learning
spellingShingle Monique M Kuglitsch
Arif Albayrak
Jürg Luterbacher
Allison Craddock
Andrea Toreti
Jackie Ma
Paula Padrino Vilela
Elena Xoplaki
Rui Kotani
Dominique Berod
Jon Cox
Ivanka Pelivan
When it comes to Earth observations in AI for disaster risk reduction, is it feast or famine? A topical review
Environmental Research Letters
Earth observation
remote sensing
disaster risk reduction
artificial intelligence
machine learning
title When it comes to Earth observations in AI for disaster risk reduction, is it feast or famine? A topical review
title_full When it comes to Earth observations in AI for disaster risk reduction, is it feast or famine? A topical review
title_fullStr When it comes to Earth observations in AI for disaster risk reduction, is it feast or famine? A topical review
title_full_unstemmed When it comes to Earth observations in AI for disaster risk reduction, is it feast or famine? A topical review
title_short When it comes to Earth observations in AI for disaster risk reduction, is it feast or famine? A topical review
title_sort when it comes to earth observations in ai for disaster risk reduction is it feast or famine a topical review
topic Earth observation
remote sensing
disaster risk reduction
artificial intelligence
machine learning
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acf601
work_keys_str_mv AT moniquemkuglitsch whenitcomestoearthobservationsinaifordisasterriskreductionisitfeastorfamineatopicalreview
AT arifalbayrak whenitcomestoearthobservationsinaifordisasterriskreductionisitfeastorfamineatopicalreview
AT jurgluterbacher whenitcomestoearthobservationsinaifordisasterriskreductionisitfeastorfamineatopicalreview
AT allisoncraddock whenitcomestoearthobservationsinaifordisasterriskreductionisitfeastorfamineatopicalreview
AT andreatoreti whenitcomestoearthobservationsinaifordisasterriskreductionisitfeastorfamineatopicalreview
AT jackiema whenitcomestoearthobservationsinaifordisasterriskreductionisitfeastorfamineatopicalreview
AT paulapadrinovilela whenitcomestoearthobservationsinaifordisasterriskreductionisitfeastorfamineatopicalreview
AT elenaxoplaki whenitcomestoearthobservationsinaifordisasterriskreductionisitfeastorfamineatopicalreview
AT ruikotani whenitcomestoearthobservationsinaifordisasterriskreductionisitfeastorfamineatopicalreview
AT dominiqueberod whenitcomestoearthobservationsinaifordisasterriskreductionisitfeastorfamineatopicalreview
AT joncox whenitcomestoearthobservationsinaifordisasterriskreductionisitfeastorfamineatopicalreview
AT ivankapelivan whenitcomestoearthobservationsinaifordisasterriskreductionisitfeastorfamineatopicalreview