L’ambivalence des communs
In many areas, resources are used and managed in common. The value of a common-pool resources, which today justifies the attention that is given to its management, reflects the anticipation of the achievements of an upcoming process of the resources units it provides. We qualify as intangible this d...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles
|
Series: | Développement Durable et Territoires |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/13442 |
_version_ | 1797312050145263616 |
---|---|
author | Gilles Allaire |
author_facet | Gilles Allaire |
author_sort | Gilles Allaire |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In many areas, resources are used and managed in common. The value of a common-pool resources, which today justifies the attention that is given to its management, reflects the anticipation of the achievements of an upcoming process of the resources units it provides. We qualify as intangible this dimension, shared by material, and more widely, types of common-pool resources, and we relate it to the concept of intangible property introduced by J. R. Commons. The Ostrom’s concept of commons has several facets. It is not only a system of resources (« common-pool resources »), but also a property regime and more widely a type of complex institutional arrangement, as well as the justifications given for it. We conceptualize the ambivalence of this concept by considering the institutional complexity and the temporal dimension of systems of collective resources. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T02:09:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-76c898305bd84d3f99f95e026baea1c1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1772-9971 |
language | fra |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T02:09:37Z |
publisher | Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles |
record_format | Article |
series | Développement Durable et Territoires |
spelling | doaj.art-76c898305bd84d3f99f95e026baea1c12024-02-13T15:28:02ZfraRéseau Développement Durable et Territoires FragilesDéveloppement Durable et Territoires1772-99711010.4000/developpementdurable.13442L’ambivalence des communsGilles AllaireIn many areas, resources are used and managed in common. The value of a common-pool resources, which today justifies the attention that is given to its management, reflects the anticipation of the achievements of an upcoming process of the resources units it provides. We qualify as intangible this dimension, shared by material, and more widely, types of common-pool resources, and we relate it to the concept of intangible property introduced by J. R. Commons. The Ostrom’s concept of commons has several facets. It is not only a system of resources (« common-pool resources »), but also a property regime and more widely a type of complex institutional arrangement, as well as the justifications given for it. We conceptualize the ambivalence of this concept by considering the institutional complexity and the temporal dimension of systems of collective resources.https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/13442common propertypolitical economycommonsintangible propertyinstitutional economicscommon good |
spellingShingle | Gilles Allaire L’ambivalence des communs Développement Durable et Territoires common property political economy commons intangible property institutional economics common good |
title | L’ambivalence des communs |
title_full | L’ambivalence des communs |
title_fullStr | L’ambivalence des communs |
title_full_unstemmed | L’ambivalence des communs |
title_short | L’ambivalence des communs |
title_sort | l ambivalence des communs |
topic | common property political economy commons intangible property institutional economics common good |
url | https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/13442 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillesallaire lambivalencedescommuns |