L’ambivalence des communs

In many areas, resources are used and managed in common. The value of a common-pool resources, which today justifies the attention that is given to its management, reflects the anticipation of the achievements of an upcoming process of the resources units it provides. We qualify as intangible this d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gilles Allaire
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles
Series:Développement Durable et Territoires
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/13442
_version_ 1797312050145263616
author Gilles Allaire
author_facet Gilles Allaire
author_sort Gilles Allaire
collection DOAJ
description In many areas, resources are used and managed in common. The value of a common-pool resources, which today justifies the attention that is given to its management, reflects the anticipation of the achievements of an upcoming process of the resources units it provides. We qualify as intangible this dimension, shared by material, and more widely, types of common-pool resources, and we relate it to the concept of intangible property introduced by J. R. Commons. The Ostrom’s concept of commons has several facets. It is not only a system of resources (« common-pool resources »), but also a property regime and more widely a type of complex institutional arrangement, as well as the justifications given for it. We conceptualize the ambivalence of this concept by considering the institutional complexity and the temporal dimension of systems of collective resources.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T02:09:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76c898305bd84d3f99f95e026baea1c1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1772-9971
language fra
last_indexed 2024-03-08T02:09:37Z
publisher Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles
record_format Article
series Développement Durable et Territoires
spelling doaj.art-76c898305bd84d3f99f95e026baea1c12024-02-13T15:28:02ZfraRéseau Développement Durable et Territoires FragilesDéveloppement Durable et Territoires1772-99711010.4000/developpementdurable.13442L’ambivalence des communsGilles AllaireIn many areas, resources are used and managed in common. The value of a common-pool resources, which today justifies the attention that is given to its management, reflects the anticipation of the achievements of an upcoming process of the resources units it provides. We qualify as intangible this dimension, shared by material, and more widely, types of common-pool resources, and we relate it to the concept of intangible property introduced by J. R. Commons. The Ostrom’s concept of commons has several facets. It is not only a system of resources (« common-pool resources »), but also a property regime and more widely a type of complex institutional arrangement, as well as the justifications given for it. We conceptualize the ambivalence of this concept by considering the institutional complexity and the temporal dimension of systems of collective resources.https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/13442common propertypolitical economycommonsintangible propertyinstitutional economicscommon good
spellingShingle Gilles Allaire
L’ambivalence des communs
Développement Durable et Territoires
common property
political economy
commons
intangible property
institutional economics
common good
title L’ambivalence des communs
title_full L’ambivalence des communs
title_fullStr L’ambivalence des communs
title_full_unstemmed L’ambivalence des communs
title_short L’ambivalence des communs
title_sort l ambivalence des communs
topic common property
political economy
commons
intangible property
institutional economics
common good
url https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/13442
work_keys_str_mv AT gillesallaire lambivalencedescommuns