Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples

Background and study aims The contamination level of ready-to-use endoscopes published in the literature varies from 0.4 % to 49.0 %. Unfortunately, the comparison and the interpretation of these results are quite impossible, given the limited number of samples and sites included and the differences...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lionel Pineau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-03-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1991-1391
_version_ 1797867666739822592
author Lionel Pineau
author_facet Lionel Pineau
author_sort Lionel Pineau
collection DOAJ
description Background and study aims The contamination level of ready-to-use endoscopes published in the literature varies from 0.4 % to 49.0 %. Unfortunately, the comparison and the interpretation of these results are quite impossible, given the limited number of samples and sites included and the differences observed between sampling, culturing methods, and interpretation criteria. Methods The objective of this retrospective study was to analyze the results of 90,311 endoscope samples collected between 2004 and 2021 in 490 private or public hospitals in France. Results Through the full test period, the mean ratio of endoscopes at the action level was 12.6 % (19.5 % including alert level). Of the endoscopy units, 23.0 % had a ratio of compliant endoscopes ≤ 70.0 %. The overall microbial quality of gastroscopes, duodenoscopes, and colonoscopes is improving year by year, whereas an opposite trend is observed for ultrasound endoscopes and bronchoscopes. In 2021, following French guidelines, 13.0 % of the endoscopes should have been quarantined and 8.1 % were at the alert level, meaning that the contamination level of 21.1 % of the endoscopes exceeded what was defined as a maximum acceptable value. Conclusions This study demonstrates that additional efforts, including implementation of microbial surveillance strategies using a standardized sampling method and periodic observational audits, must be made to improve the overall microbiological quality of endoscopes and reduce the risk associated with their use.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T23:44:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76c9c2ee66c14d358a3f604944e09ce6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T23:44:54Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format Article
series Endoscopy International Open
spelling doaj.art-76c9c2ee66c14d358a3f604944e09ce62023-03-18T00:41:35ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362023-03-011103E247E25710.1055/a-1991-1391Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samplesLionel Pineau0Eurofins Biotech Germande, Medical Device Testing, Aix-en-Provence, FranceBackground and study aims The contamination level of ready-to-use endoscopes published in the literature varies from 0.4 % to 49.0 %. Unfortunately, the comparison and the interpretation of these results are quite impossible, given the limited number of samples and sites included and the differences observed between sampling, culturing methods, and interpretation criteria. Methods The objective of this retrospective study was to analyze the results of 90,311 endoscope samples collected between 2004 and 2021 in 490 private or public hospitals in France. Results Through the full test period, the mean ratio of endoscopes at the action level was 12.6 % (19.5 % including alert level). Of the endoscopy units, 23.0 % had a ratio of compliant endoscopes ≤ 70.0 %. The overall microbial quality of gastroscopes, duodenoscopes, and colonoscopes is improving year by year, whereas an opposite trend is observed for ultrasound endoscopes and bronchoscopes. In 2021, following French guidelines, 13.0 % of the endoscopes should have been quarantined and 8.1 % were at the alert level, meaning that the contamination level of 21.1 % of the endoscopes exceeded what was defined as a maximum acceptable value. Conclusions This study demonstrates that additional efforts, including implementation of microbial surveillance strategies using a standardized sampling method and periodic observational audits, must be made to improve the overall microbiological quality of endoscopes and reduce the risk associated with their use.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1991-1391
spellingShingle Lionel Pineau
Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
Endoscopy International Open
title Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
title_full Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
title_fullStr Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
title_full_unstemmed Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
title_short Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
title_sort endoscope reprocessing retrospective analysis of 90 311 samples
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1991-1391
work_keys_str_mv AT lionelpineau endoscopereprocessingretrospectiveanalysisof90311samples