Recruitment methods and yield rates for a multisite clinical trial exploring risk reduction for Alzheimer's disease (rrAD)

Abstract INTRODUCTION The risk reduction for Alzheimer's disease (rrAD) trial was a multisite clinical trial to assess exercise and intensive vascular pharmacological treatment on cognitive function in community‐dwelling older adults at increased risk for Alzheimer's disease. METHODS Eligi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda N. Szabo‐Reed, Tristyn Hall, Eric D. Vidoni, Angela Van Sciver, Monica Sewell, Jeffrey M. Burns, C. Munro Cullum, William P. Gahan, Linda S. Hynan, Diana R. Kerwin, Heidi Rossetti, Ann M. Stowe, Wanpen Vongpatanasin, David C. Zhu, Rong Zhang, Jeffrey N. Keller, Ellen F. Binder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-10-01
Series:Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12422
_version_ 1827397780056834048
author Amanda N. Szabo‐Reed
Tristyn Hall
Eric D. Vidoni
Angela Van Sciver
Monica Sewell
Jeffrey M. Burns
C. Munro Cullum
William P. Gahan
Linda S. Hynan
Diana R. Kerwin
Heidi Rossetti
Ann M. Stowe
Wanpen Vongpatanasin
David C. Zhu
Rong Zhang
Jeffrey N. Keller
Ellen F. Binder
author_facet Amanda N. Szabo‐Reed
Tristyn Hall
Eric D. Vidoni
Angela Van Sciver
Monica Sewell
Jeffrey M. Burns
C. Munro Cullum
William P. Gahan
Linda S. Hynan
Diana R. Kerwin
Heidi Rossetti
Ann M. Stowe
Wanpen Vongpatanasin
David C. Zhu
Rong Zhang
Jeffrey N. Keller
Ellen F. Binder
author_sort Amanda N. Szabo‐Reed
collection DOAJ
description Abstract INTRODUCTION The risk reduction for Alzheimer's disease (rrAD) trial was a multisite clinical trial to assess exercise and intensive vascular pharmacological treatment on cognitive function in community‐dwelling older adults at increased risk for Alzheimer's disease. METHODS Eligibility, consent, and randomization rates across different referral sources were compared. Informal interviews conducted with each site's project team were conducted upon study completion. RESULTS Initially, 3290 individuals were screened, of whom 28% were eligible to consent, 805 consented to participate (87.2% of those eligible), and 513 (36.3% of those consented) were randomized. Emails sent from study site listservs/databases yielded the highest amount (20.9%) of screened individuals. Professional referrals from physicians yielded the greatest percentage of consented individuals (57.1%). Referrals from non‐professional contacts (ie, friends, family; 75%) and mail/phone contact from a site (73.8%) had the highest yield of randomization. DISCUSSION Professional referrals or email from listservs/registries were most effective for enrolling participants. The greatest yield of eligible/randomized participants came from non‐professional and mail/phone contacts. Future trials should consider special efforts targeting these recruitment approaches. Highlights Clinical trial recruitment is commonly cited as a significant barrier to advancing our understanding of cognitive health interventions. The most cited referral source was email, followed by interviews/editorials on the radio, television, local newspapers, newsletters, or magazine articles. The referral method that brought in the largest number of contacts was email but did not result in the greatest yield of consents or eligible participants. The sources that yielded the greatest likelihood of consent were professional referrals (ie, physician), social media, and mail/phone contact from study site. The greatest yield of eligible/randomized participants came from non‐professional contacts and mail/phone contact from a site. Findings suggest that sites may need to focus on more selective referral sources, such as using contact mailing and phone lists, rather than more widely viewed recruitment sources, such as social media or TV/radio advertisements.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:16:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76e17e8719694a40a6deed1b1495c499
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-8737
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:16:33Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
spelling doaj.art-76e17e8719694a40a6deed1b1495c4992023-12-27T06:47:04ZengWileyAlzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions2352-87372023-10-0194n/an/a10.1002/trc2.12422Recruitment methods and yield rates for a multisite clinical trial exploring risk reduction for Alzheimer's disease (rrAD)Amanda N. Szabo‐Reed0Tristyn Hall1Eric D. Vidoni2Angela Van Sciver3Monica Sewell4Jeffrey M. Burns5C. Munro Cullum6William P. Gahan7Linda S. Hynan8Diana R. Kerwin9Heidi Rossetti10Ann M. Stowe11Wanpen Vongpatanasin12David C. Zhu13Rong Zhang14Jeffrey N. Keller15Ellen F. Binder16KU Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Kansas Medical CenterFairwayKansasUSAInstitute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas Dallas USAKU Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Kansas Medical CenterFairwayKansasUSAKU Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Kansas Medical CenterFairwayKansasUSADepartment of Internal Medicine Division of Geriatrics & Nutritional Science Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis St. Louis Missouri USAKU Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Kansas Medical CenterFairwayKansasUSADepartment of Psychiatry UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USAInstitute for Dementia Research and Prevention Pennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USADepartment of Psychiatry UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USAKerwin Research Center and Memory Care Dallas Texas USADepartment of Psychiatry UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USADepartment of Neurology University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USAInstitute for Dementia Research and Prevention Pennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USADepartment for Radiology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USAInstitute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas Dallas USAInstitute for Dementia Research and Prevention Pennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USADepartment of Internal Medicine Division of Geriatrics & Nutritional Science Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis St. Louis Missouri USAAbstract INTRODUCTION The risk reduction for Alzheimer's disease (rrAD) trial was a multisite clinical trial to assess exercise and intensive vascular pharmacological treatment on cognitive function in community‐dwelling older adults at increased risk for Alzheimer's disease. METHODS Eligibility, consent, and randomization rates across different referral sources were compared. Informal interviews conducted with each site's project team were conducted upon study completion. RESULTS Initially, 3290 individuals were screened, of whom 28% were eligible to consent, 805 consented to participate (87.2% of those eligible), and 513 (36.3% of those consented) were randomized. Emails sent from study site listservs/databases yielded the highest amount (20.9%) of screened individuals. Professional referrals from physicians yielded the greatest percentage of consented individuals (57.1%). Referrals from non‐professional contacts (ie, friends, family; 75%) and mail/phone contact from a site (73.8%) had the highest yield of randomization. DISCUSSION Professional referrals or email from listservs/registries were most effective for enrolling participants. The greatest yield of eligible/randomized participants came from non‐professional and mail/phone contacts. Future trials should consider special efforts targeting these recruitment approaches. Highlights Clinical trial recruitment is commonly cited as a significant barrier to advancing our understanding of cognitive health interventions. The most cited referral source was email, followed by interviews/editorials on the radio, television, local newspapers, newsletters, or magazine articles. The referral method that brought in the largest number of contacts was email but did not result in the greatest yield of consents or eligible participants. The sources that yielded the greatest likelihood of consent were professional referrals (ie, physician), social media, and mail/phone contact from study site. The greatest yield of eligible/randomized participants came from non‐professional contacts and mail/phone contact from a site. Findings suggest that sites may need to focus on more selective referral sources, such as using contact mailing and phone lists, rather than more widely viewed recruitment sources, such as social media or TV/radio advertisements.https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12422Alzheimer's diseasebrain structurecognitionexerciserecruitmentreduction of vascular risk factors
spellingShingle Amanda N. Szabo‐Reed
Tristyn Hall
Eric D. Vidoni
Angela Van Sciver
Monica Sewell
Jeffrey M. Burns
C. Munro Cullum
William P. Gahan
Linda S. Hynan
Diana R. Kerwin
Heidi Rossetti
Ann M. Stowe
Wanpen Vongpatanasin
David C. Zhu
Rong Zhang
Jeffrey N. Keller
Ellen F. Binder
Recruitment methods and yield rates for a multisite clinical trial exploring risk reduction for Alzheimer's disease (rrAD)
Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Alzheimer's disease
brain structure
cognition
exercise
recruitment
reduction of vascular risk factors
title Recruitment methods and yield rates for a multisite clinical trial exploring risk reduction for Alzheimer's disease (rrAD)
title_full Recruitment methods and yield rates for a multisite clinical trial exploring risk reduction for Alzheimer's disease (rrAD)
title_fullStr Recruitment methods and yield rates for a multisite clinical trial exploring risk reduction for Alzheimer's disease (rrAD)
title_full_unstemmed Recruitment methods and yield rates for a multisite clinical trial exploring risk reduction for Alzheimer's disease (rrAD)
title_short Recruitment methods and yield rates for a multisite clinical trial exploring risk reduction for Alzheimer's disease (rrAD)
title_sort recruitment methods and yield rates for a multisite clinical trial exploring risk reduction for alzheimer s disease rrad
topic Alzheimer's disease
brain structure
cognition
exercise
recruitment
reduction of vascular risk factors
url https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12422
work_keys_str_mv AT amandanszaboreed recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT tristynhall recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT ericdvidoni recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT angelavansciver recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT monicasewell recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT jeffreymburns recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT cmunrocullum recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT williampgahan recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT lindashynan recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT dianarkerwin recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT heidirossetti recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT annmstowe recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT wanpenvongpatanasin recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT davidczhu recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT rongzhang recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT jeffreynkeller recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad
AT ellenfbinder recruitmentmethodsandyieldratesforamultisiteclinicaltrialexploringriskreductionforalzheimersdiseaserrad