Accelerated Diffusion-Weighted MRI of Rectal Cancer Using a Residual Convolutional Network

This work presents a deep-learning-based denoising technique to accelerate the acquisition of high <i>b</i>-value diffusion-weighted MRI for rectal cancer. A denoising convolutional neural network (DCNN) with a combined L1–L2 loss function was developed to denoise high <i>b</i&g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohaddese Mohammadi, Elena A. Kaye, Or Alus, Youngwook Kee, Jennifer S. Golia Pernicka, Maria El Homsi, Iva Petkovska, Ricardo Otazo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Bioengineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/10/3/359
Description
Summary:This work presents a deep-learning-based denoising technique to accelerate the acquisition of high <i>b</i>-value diffusion-weighted MRI for rectal cancer. A denoising convolutional neural network (DCNN) with a combined L1–L2 loss function was developed to denoise high <i>b</i>-value diffusion-weighted MRI data acquired with fewer repetitions (NEX: number of excitations) using the low <i>b</i>-value image as an anatomical guide. DCNN was trained using 85 datasets acquired on patients with rectal cancer and tested on 20 different datasets with NEX = 1, 2, and 4, corresponding to acceleration factors of 16, 8, and 4, respectively. Image quality was assessed qualitatively by expert body radiologists. Reader 1 scored similar overall image quality between denoised images with NEX = 1 and NEX = 2, which were slightly lower than the reference. Reader 2 scored similar quality between NEX = 1 and the reference, while better quality for NEX = 2. Denoised images with fourfold acceleration (NEX = 4) received even higher scores than the reference, which is due in part to the effect of gas-related motion in the rectum, which affects longer acquisitions. The proposed deep learning denoising technique can enable eightfold acceleration with similar image quality (average image quality = 2.8 ± 0.5) and fourfold acceleration with higher image quality (3.0 ± 0.6) than the clinical standard (2.5 ± 0.8) for improved diagnosis of rectal cancer.
ISSN:2306-5354