Fighting for a Cause
<p>On 18 October 2022, the European Court of Human Rights handed down its judgement in the case of Mørck Jensen v. Denmark, upholding the applicant’s conviction under Danish law of breaching the prohibition on entry into and stay in a conflict zone in order to participate in armed hostilities...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | Verfassungsblog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/fighting-for-a-cause/ |
| _version_ | 1798027121309777920 |
|---|---|
| author | Raphael Oidtmann |
| author_facet | Raphael Oidtmann |
| author_sort | Raphael Oidtmann |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>On 18 October 2022, the European Court of Human Rights handed down its judgement in the case of Mørck Jensen v. Denmark, upholding the applicant’s conviction under Danish law of breaching the prohibition on entry into and stay in a conflict zone in order to participate in armed hostilities on the side of one party to an ongoing armed conflict. In its judgment, the Court consciously opted to take an objective or neutral stance towards the question of whether there may exist ‘right’ reasons to travel to a hot conflict zone in order to actively participate in armed activities.</p>
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T18:47:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-76efb7c8d0ea49eaa1ee16414c71326b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-7044 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T18:47:26Z |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Verfassungsblog |
| spelling | doaj.art-76efb7c8d0ea49eaa1ee16414c71326b2022-12-22T04:08:40ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442022-10-012366-7044Fighting for a CauseRaphael Oidtmann<p>On 18 October 2022, the European Court of Human Rights handed down its judgement in the case of Mørck Jensen v. Denmark, upholding the applicant’s conviction under Danish law of breaching the prohibition on entry into and stay in a conflict zone in order to participate in armed hostilities on the side of one party to an ongoing armed conflict. In its judgment, the Court consciously opted to take an objective or neutral stance towards the question of whether there may exist ‘right’ reasons to travel to a hot conflict zone in order to actively participate in armed activities.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/fighting-for-a-cause/Denmark, ECHR, ECtHR, ISIL, ISIS, nullum crimen sine lege, Terrorism |
| spellingShingle | Raphael Oidtmann Fighting for a Cause Verfassungsblog Denmark, ECHR, ECtHR, ISIL, ISIS, nullum crimen sine lege, Terrorism |
| title | Fighting for a Cause |
| title_full | Fighting for a Cause |
| title_fullStr | Fighting for a Cause |
| title_full_unstemmed | Fighting for a Cause |
| title_short | Fighting for a Cause |
| title_sort | fighting for a cause |
| topic | Denmark, ECHR, ECtHR, ISIL, ISIS, nullum crimen sine lege, Terrorism |
| url | https://verfassungsblog.de/fighting-for-a-cause/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT raphaeloidtmann fightingforacause |