Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China

Agricultural technological change plays a crucial role in food security and agricultural development. In the case of considering economic risks and technical risk tolerance, farmers will use different technologies to match production factors to achieve the optimal production state. Therefore, under...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui Luo, Zhaomin Hu, Xiuping Hao, Nawab Khan, Xiaojie Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1895
_version_ 1797467589204508672
author Hui Luo
Zhaomin Hu
Xiuping Hao
Nawab Khan
Xiaojie Liu
author_facet Hui Luo
Zhaomin Hu
Xiuping Hao
Nawab Khan
Xiaojie Liu
author_sort Hui Luo
collection DOAJ
description Agricultural technological change plays a crucial role in food security and agricultural development. In the case of considering economic risks and technical risk tolerance, farmers will use different technologies to match production factors to achieve the optimal production state. Therefore, under different farmland management modes, farms show different characteristics of technological progress. This paper attempts to compare and analyze agricultural technology development under different farmland management modes: the unified management mode of collective organizations (UMCO) and the decentralized management mode of contracted families (DMCF). The Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) of the translog average production function was applied to the 24 farms of the Hulunbuir Agricultural Reclamation Group, of which 11 farms in the western part of the Greater Khingan Mountains (Western Farms) were managed by the DMCF, and the other 13 farms in the eastern part of the Greater Khingan Mountains (Eastern Farms) were managed by the UMCO. The results are as follows: (1) without considering the resource allocation efficiency, from 2000 to 2019, the generalized technological progress rate (TFPG) of the 13 Eastern Farms (7.65%) was higher than that of the Western Farms (2.25%). (2) The returns to scale (SRC) of the Western Farms was higher than that of the Eastern Farms. (3) The technological efficiency change rate (TEC) and the technical progress (TP) of the Eastern Farms is higher than that of the Western Farms. It is recommended that farms strengthen the construction of their infrastructure and service systems, resist natural disasters, reduce the disaster’s impact on technological progress, give full play to the overall planning advantages of the collective organizations, improve the product allocation efficiency factors, and create connotative profit points.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T18:55:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76f1c0a86c164e49b17cf665c39aab85
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T18:55:48Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-76f1c0a86c164e49b17cf665c39aab852023-11-24T05:27:12ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2022-10-011111189510.3390/land11111895Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, ChinaHui Luo0Zhaomin Hu1Xiuping Hao2Nawab Khan3Xiaojie Liu4School of Economics and Management (School of Co-Operatives), Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, ChinaInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaSchool of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, ChinaCollege of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611100, ChinaInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaAgricultural technological change plays a crucial role in food security and agricultural development. In the case of considering economic risks and technical risk tolerance, farmers will use different technologies to match production factors to achieve the optimal production state. Therefore, under different farmland management modes, farms show different characteristics of technological progress. This paper attempts to compare and analyze agricultural technology development under different farmland management modes: the unified management mode of collective organizations (UMCO) and the decentralized management mode of contracted families (DMCF). The Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) of the translog average production function was applied to the 24 farms of the Hulunbuir Agricultural Reclamation Group, of which 11 farms in the western part of the Greater Khingan Mountains (Western Farms) were managed by the DMCF, and the other 13 farms in the eastern part of the Greater Khingan Mountains (Eastern Farms) were managed by the UMCO. The results are as follows: (1) without considering the resource allocation efficiency, from 2000 to 2019, the generalized technological progress rate (TFPG) of the 13 Eastern Farms (7.65%) was higher than that of the Western Farms (2.25%). (2) The returns to scale (SRC) of the Western Farms was higher than that of the Eastern Farms. (3) The technological efficiency change rate (TEC) and the technical progress (TP) of the Eastern Farms is higher than that of the Western Farms. It is recommended that farms strengthen the construction of their infrastructure and service systems, resist natural disasters, reduce the disaster’s impact on technological progress, give full play to the overall planning advantages of the collective organizations, improve the product allocation efficiency factors, and create connotative profit points.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1895land management modesSFAtechnological progress rateHulunbuir Farm Reclamation Group
spellingShingle Hui Luo
Zhaomin Hu
Xiuping Hao
Nawab Khan
Xiaojie Liu
Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China
Land
land management modes
SFA
technological progress rate
Hulunbuir Farm Reclamation Group
title Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China
title_full Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China
title_fullStr Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China
title_full_unstemmed Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China
title_short Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China
title_sort assessment and comparison of agricultural technology development under different farmland management modes a case study of grain production china
topic land management modes
SFA
technological progress rate
Hulunbuir Farm Reclamation Group
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1895
work_keys_str_mv AT huiluo assessmentandcomparisonofagriculturaltechnologydevelopmentunderdifferentfarmlandmanagementmodesacasestudyofgrainproductionchina
AT zhaominhu assessmentandcomparisonofagriculturaltechnologydevelopmentunderdifferentfarmlandmanagementmodesacasestudyofgrainproductionchina
AT xiupinghao assessmentandcomparisonofagriculturaltechnologydevelopmentunderdifferentfarmlandmanagementmodesacasestudyofgrainproductionchina
AT nawabkhan assessmentandcomparisonofagriculturaltechnologydevelopmentunderdifferentfarmlandmanagementmodesacasestudyofgrainproductionchina
AT xiaojieliu assessmentandcomparisonofagriculturaltechnologydevelopmentunderdifferentfarmlandmanagementmodesacasestudyofgrainproductionchina