Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China
Agricultural technological change plays a crucial role in food security and agricultural development. In the case of considering economic risks and technical risk tolerance, farmers will use different technologies to match production factors to achieve the optimal production state. Therefore, under...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Land |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1895 |
_version_ | 1797467589204508672 |
---|---|
author | Hui Luo Zhaomin Hu Xiuping Hao Nawab Khan Xiaojie Liu |
author_facet | Hui Luo Zhaomin Hu Xiuping Hao Nawab Khan Xiaojie Liu |
author_sort | Hui Luo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Agricultural technological change plays a crucial role in food security and agricultural development. In the case of considering economic risks and technical risk tolerance, farmers will use different technologies to match production factors to achieve the optimal production state. Therefore, under different farmland management modes, farms show different characteristics of technological progress. This paper attempts to compare and analyze agricultural technology development under different farmland management modes: the unified management mode of collective organizations (UMCO) and the decentralized management mode of contracted families (DMCF). The Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) of the translog average production function was applied to the 24 farms of the Hulunbuir Agricultural Reclamation Group, of which 11 farms in the western part of the Greater Khingan Mountains (Western Farms) were managed by the DMCF, and the other 13 farms in the eastern part of the Greater Khingan Mountains (Eastern Farms) were managed by the UMCO. The results are as follows: (1) without considering the resource allocation efficiency, from 2000 to 2019, the generalized technological progress rate (TFPG) of the 13 Eastern Farms (7.65%) was higher than that of the Western Farms (2.25%). (2) The returns to scale (SRC) of the Western Farms was higher than that of the Eastern Farms. (3) The technological efficiency change rate (TEC) and the technical progress (TP) of the Eastern Farms is higher than that of the Western Farms. It is recommended that farms strengthen the construction of their infrastructure and service systems, resist natural disasters, reduce the disaster’s impact on technological progress, give full play to the overall planning advantages of the collective organizations, improve the product allocation efficiency factors, and create connotative profit points. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T18:55:48Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-76f1c0a86c164e49b17cf665c39aab85 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2073-445X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T18:55:48Z |
publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Land |
spelling | doaj.art-76f1c0a86c164e49b17cf665c39aab852023-11-24T05:27:12ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2022-10-011111189510.3390/land11111895Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, ChinaHui Luo0Zhaomin Hu1Xiuping Hao2Nawab Khan3Xiaojie Liu4School of Economics and Management (School of Co-Operatives), Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, ChinaInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaSchool of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, ChinaCollege of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611100, ChinaInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaAgricultural technological change plays a crucial role in food security and agricultural development. In the case of considering economic risks and technical risk tolerance, farmers will use different technologies to match production factors to achieve the optimal production state. Therefore, under different farmland management modes, farms show different characteristics of technological progress. This paper attempts to compare and analyze agricultural technology development under different farmland management modes: the unified management mode of collective organizations (UMCO) and the decentralized management mode of contracted families (DMCF). The Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) of the translog average production function was applied to the 24 farms of the Hulunbuir Agricultural Reclamation Group, of which 11 farms in the western part of the Greater Khingan Mountains (Western Farms) were managed by the DMCF, and the other 13 farms in the eastern part of the Greater Khingan Mountains (Eastern Farms) were managed by the UMCO. The results are as follows: (1) without considering the resource allocation efficiency, from 2000 to 2019, the generalized technological progress rate (TFPG) of the 13 Eastern Farms (7.65%) was higher than that of the Western Farms (2.25%). (2) The returns to scale (SRC) of the Western Farms was higher than that of the Eastern Farms. (3) The technological efficiency change rate (TEC) and the technical progress (TP) of the Eastern Farms is higher than that of the Western Farms. It is recommended that farms strengthen the construction of their infrastructure and service systems, resist natural disasters, reduce the disaster’s impact on technological progress, give full play to the overall planning advantages of the collective organizations, improve the product allocation efficiency factors, and create connotative profit points.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1895land management modesSFAtechnological progress rateHulunbuir Farm Reclamation Group |
spellingShingle | Hui Luo Zhaomin Hu Xiuping Hao Nawab Khan Xiaojie Liu Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China Land land management modes SFA technological progress rate Hulunbuir Farm Reclamation Group |
title | Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China |
title_full | Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China |
title_fullStr | Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China |
title_short | Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China |
title_sort | assessment and comparison of agricultural technology development under different farmland management modes a case study of grain production china |
topic | land management modes SFA technological progress rate Hulunbuir Farm Reclamation Group |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1895 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huiluo assessmentandcomparisonofagriculturaltechnologydevelopmentunderdifferentfarmlandmanagementmodesacasestudyofgrainproductionchina AT zhaominhu assessmentandcomparisonofagriculturaltechnologydevelopmentunderdifferentfarmlandmanagementmodesacasestudyofgrainproductionchina AT xiupinghao assessmentandcomparisonofagriculturaltechnologydevelopmentunderdifferentfarmlandmanagementmodesacasestudyofgrainproductionchina AT nawabkhan assessmentandcomparisonofagriculturaltechnologydevelopmentunderdifferentfarmlandmanagementmodesacasestudyofgrainproductionchina AT xiaojieliu assessmentandcomparisonofagriculturaltechnologydevelopmentunderdifferentfarmlandmanagementmodesacasestudyofgrainproductionchina |