Host tolerance and resistance to parasitic nest flies differs between two wild bird species

Abstract Hosts have developed and evolved defense strategies to limit parasite damage. Hosts can reduce the damage that parasites cause by decreasing parasite fitness (resistance) or without affecting parasite fitness (tolerance). Because a parasite species can infect multiple host species, determin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kirstine M. Grab, Brian J. Hiller, John H. Hurlbert, McKenzie E. Ingram, Alexandra B. Parker, Darya Y. Pokutnaya, Sarah A. Knutie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-11-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5682
_version_ 1819116342146498560
author Kirstine M. Grab
Brian J. Hiller
John H. Hurlbert
McKenzie E. Ingram
Alexandra B. Parker
Darya Y. Pokutnaya
Sarah A. Knutie
author_facet Kirstine M. Grab
Brian J. Hiller
John H. Hurlbert
McKenzie E. Ingram
Alexandra B. Parker
Darya Y. Pokutnaya
Sarah A. Knutie
author_sort Kirstine M. Grab
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Hosts have developed and evolved defense strategies to limit parasite damage. Hosts can reduce the damage that parasites cause by decreasing parasite fitness (resistance) or without affecting parasite fitness (tolerance). Because a parasite species can infect multiple host species, determining the effect of the parasite on these hosts and identifying host defense strategies can have important implications for multi‐host–parasite dynamics. Over 2 years, we experimentally manipulated parasitic flies (Protocalliphora sialia) in the nests of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) and eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). We then determined the effects of the parasites on the survival of nestlings and compared defense strategies between host species. We compared resistance between host species by quantifying parasite densities (number of parasites per gram of host) and measured nestling antibody levels as a mechanism of resistance. We quantified tolerance by determining the relationship between parasite density and nestling survival and blood loss by measuring hemoglobin levels (as a proxy of blood recovery) and nestling provisioning rates (as a proxy of parental compensation for resources lost to the parasite) as potential mechanisms of tolerance. For bluebirds, parasite density was twice as high as for swallows. Both host species were tolerant to the effects of P. sialia on nestling survival at their respective parasite loads but neither species were tolerant to the blood loss to the parasite. However, swallows were more resistant to P. sialia compared to bluebirds, which was likely related to the higher antibody‐mediated immune response in swallow nestlings. Neither blood recovery nor parental compensation were mechanisms of tolerance. Overall, these results suggest that bluebirds and swallows are both tolerant of their respective parasite loads but swallows are more resistant to the parasites. These results demonstrate that different host species have evolved similar and different defenses against the same species of parasite.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T05:15:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76f27894341d49c1b2551665f8fcca1f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T05:15:34Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-76f27894341d49c1b2551665f8fcca1f2022-12-21T18:37:52ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582019-11-01921121441215510.1002/ece3.5682Host tolerance and resistance to parasitic nest flies differs between two wild bird speciesKirstine M. Grab0Brian J. Hiller1John H. Hurlbert2McKenzie E. Ingram3Alexandra B. Parker4Darya Y. Pokutnaya5Sarah A. Knutie6Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota Twin Cities St. Paul MN USABiology Department Bemidji State University Bemidji MN USAChristmas Forest Bemidji MN USABiology Department Bemidji State University Bemidji MN USADepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota Twin Cities St. Paul MN USADepartment of Biology University of Minnesota Morris Morris MN USADepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Storrs CT USAAbstract Hosts have developed and evolved defense strategies to limit parasite damage. Hosts can reduce the damage that parasites cause by decreasing parasite fitness (resistance) or without affecting parasite fitness (tolerance). Because a parasite species can infect multiple host species, determining the effect of the parasite on these hosts and identifying host defense strategies can have important implications for multi‐host–parasite dynamics. Over 2 years, we experimentally manipulated parasitic flies (Protocalliphora sialia) in the nests of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) and eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). We then determined the effects of the parasites on the survival of nestlings and compared defense strategies between host species. We compared resistance between host species by quantifying parasite densities (number of parasites per gram of host) and measured nestling antibody levels as a mechanism of resistance. We quantified tolerance by determining the relationship between parasite density and nestling survival and blood loss by measuring hemoglobin levels (as a proxy of blood recovery) and nestling provisioning rates (as a proxy of parental compensation for resources lost to the parasite) as potential mechanisms of tolerance. For bluebirds, parasite density was twice as high as for swallows. Both host species were tolerant to the effects of P. sialia on nestling survival at their respective parasite loads but neither species were tolerant to the blood loss to the parasite. However, swallows were more resistant to P. sialia compared to bluebirds, which was likely related to the higher antibody‐mediated immune response in swallow nestlings. Neither blood recovery nor parental compensation were mechanisms of tolerance. Overall, these results suggest that bluebirds and swallows are both tolerant of their respective parasite loads but swallows are more resistant to the parasites. These results demonstrate that different host species have evolved similar and different defenses against the same species of parasite.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5682ecoimmunologyhost defenseimmune responseresistancetolerance
spellingShingle Kirstine M. Grab
Brian J. Hiller
John H. Hurlbert
McKenzie E. Ingram
Alexandra B. Parker
Darya Y. Pokutnaya
Sarah A. Knutie
Host tolerance and resistance to parasitic nest flies differs between two wild bird species
Ecology and Evolution
ecoimmunology
host defense
immune response
resistance
tolerance
title Host tolerance and resistance to parasitic nest flies differs between two wild bird species
title_full Host tolerance and resistance to parasitic nest flies differs between two wild bird species
title_fullStr Host tolerance and resistance to parasitic nest flies differs between two wild bird species
title_full_unstemmed Host tolerance and resistance to parasitic nest flies differs between two wild bird species
title_short Host tolerance and resistance to parasitic nest flies differs between two wild bird species
title_sort host tolerance and resistance to parasitic nest flies differs between two wild bird species
topic ecoimmunology
host defense
immune response
resistance
tolerance
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5682
work_keys_str_mv AT kirstinemgrab hosttoleranceandresistancetoparasiticnestfliesdiffersbetweentwowildbirdspecies
AT brianjhiller hosttoleranceandresistancetoparasiticnestfliesdiffersbetweentwowildbirdspecies
AT johnhhurlbert hosttoleranceandresistancetoparasiticnestfliesdiffersbetweentwowildbirdspecies
AT mckenzieeingram hosttoleranceandresistancetoparasiticnestfliesdiffersbetweentwowildbirdspecies
AT alexandrabparker hosttoleranceandresistancetoparasiticnestfliesdiffersbetweentwowildbirdspecies
AT daryaypokutnaya hosttoleranceandresistancetoparasiticnestfliesdiffersbetweentwowildbirdspecies
AT sarahaknutie hosttoleranceandresistancetoparasiticnestfliesdiffersbetweentwowildbirdspecies